Using e-mail to facilitate nursing scholarship

Computers in Nursing

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 105-110

  Ribbons, Bob ^a   Vante, Sheila ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Critical thinking; E mail; Educational technology; Scholarship

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NURSING EDUCATION; TEACHING;

COMMUNICATION; EDUCATION, NURSING, BACCALAUREATE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; TEACHING;

EID: 0035344953     PISSN: 07368593     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Foertsch J. The impact of electronic networks on scholarly communication: avenues for research. Discourse Processes. 1995;19:301-328.
2. Fuller-Jonap F, Morrison RS, Strickland OL. Developing scholarship in nursing. In: Strickland OL, Fishman DJ, eds. Nursing issues in the 1990's. Albany, NY: Delmar Publishers; 1994:423-439.
3. Swales J. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990.
4. May KM, Meleis AI, Winstead-Fry P. Mentorship for scholarliness: opportunities and dilemmas. Nurs Outlook. 1982;30:22-28.
5. Ribbons RM, Hornblower BF. Virtual collaboration: Using e-mail to provide flexible learning and support environments. In: Corderoy RM, éd. ASCILITE98 flexibility: the next wave. Wollongong, NSW: University of Wollongong; 1998:593-601.
6. Bazerman C. Shaping written knowledge. Madison, i WI: University of Wisconsin Press; 1988.
7. D'Souza PV. The use of electronic mail as an instructional aid: an exploratory study, journal of Computer-Eased Instruction. 1991;18:106-110.
8. Lewis G. Microsoft MAIL: Facilitating communica-tion in team projects. Computers and Composition. 1994;11:59-70.
9. Peckham I. If it ain't broke, why fix it?: Disruptive and constructive computer mediated response group practices. Computers and Composition. 1996;13:327-339.
10. Mastrian KG, McGonigle D. Older student perceptions of technology-based learning assignments. J Nurs //[serial online]. August 3, 1999.
11. Todd NA. Using e-mail in an undergraduate nursing course to increase critical-thinking skills. Comptit Ntirs. 1998;16:115-118.
12. Ward R. Network. Implications of computer networking and its use in education. Nurse Ed Today. 1997;17:178-183.
13. Mastrain KG, McGonigle D. Using technology-based assignments to promote critical thinking. Nurse Ed.l999;24:45-47.
14. Van der Geest T, Remmers T. The computer as a means of communication for peer-review groups. Computers and Composition. 1994;! 1:237-250.
15. Marx M. Distant writers, distant critics, and close readings: linking composition classes through a peercritiquing network. Computers and Composition. 1990;8:23-39.
16. Ballard B, Clanchy J. Teaching students from overseas: a brief guide for lecturers and supervisors. Melbourne, Australia: Longman Cheshire; 1991.