Which transformations of stimuli are the most disruptive to facial recognition?

Perceptual and Motor Skills

Volumn 92, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 517-526

  Metzger, Mitchell M ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTOSTIMULATION; RANDOMIZATION; RECOGNITION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 0035318831     PISSN: 00315125     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/pms.2001.92.2.517     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. CAREY, S., & DIAMOND, R. (1977) From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces. Science, 195, 312-314.
2. DAVIES, G., & FLIN, R. (1984) The man behind the mask - disguise and face recognition. Human Learning, 3, 83-95.
3. HOCKLEY, W. E., HEMSWORTH, D. H., & CONSOLI, A. (1999) Shades of the mirror effect: recognition of faces with and without sunglasses. Memory & Cognition, 27, 128-138.
4. LEDER, H., & BRUCE, V. (2000) When inverted faces are recognized: the role of configural information in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: A, Human Experimental Psychology, 53A, 513-536.
5. LEVIN, D. T., & BEALE, J. M. (2000) Categorical perception occurs in newly learned faces, other-race faces, and inverted faces. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 386-401.
6. MCKELVIE, S. (1976) The role of eyes and mouth in the memory of a face. American Journal of Psychology, 89, 311-323.
7. MCKELVIE, S. (1983) Effects of lateral reversal on recognition memory for photographs of faces. British Journal of Psychology, 74, 391-407.
8. MCKELVIE, S. (1985) Lateral reversal and facial recognition memory: are right lookers special? In H. D. Ellis, M. A. Jeeves, F. Newcombe, & A. Young (Eds.), Aspects of face processing. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff. Pp. 78-87.
9. MCKELVIE, S. (1987) Sex differences, lateral reversal, and pose as factors in recognition memory for photographs of faces. Journal of General Psychology, 114(1), 13-38.
10. MCKELVIE, S. (1996) Effects of encoding operations on recognition memory for upright and inverted faces. Australian Journal of Psychology, 48, 75-85.
11. MCKILVIE, S. (1997) Perception of faces with and without spectacles. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 497-498.
12. METZGER, M. M. (1999) Differential effects of transformation on facial recognition in young children: a pilot study. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 89, 799-807.
13. PARKIN, A. J., & GOODWIN, E. (1983) The influence of different processing strategies on the recognition of transformed and untransformed faces. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 37, 272-277.
14. PATTERSON, K. E., & BADDELEY, A. D. (1977) When face recognition fails. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Performance, 3, 406-417.
15. PULLAN, L., & RHODES, G. (1996) Why are inverted faces hard to recognize? A test of the relational features hypothesis. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 25(2), 8-10.
16. RHODES, G., BRAKE, S., & ATKINSON, A. P. (1993) What's lost in inverted faces? Cognition, 47 (1), 25-57.
17. SHAPIRO, P. N., & PENROD, S. (1986) Meta-analysis of facial identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 139-156.
18. TANAKA, J. W., & SENGCO, J. A. (1997) Features and their configuration in face recognition. Memory & Cognition, 25, 583-592.
19. TERRY, R. (1994) Effects of facial transformations on accuracy of recognition. The Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 483-492.
20. VALENTINE, T., & BRUCE, V. (1986) The effect of distinctiveness in recognizing and classifying faces. Perception, 15, 525-535.
21. WOGALTER, M. S., & LAUGHERY, K. R. (1987) Face recognition: effects of study to test maintenance and change of photographic mode and pose. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1, 241-253.
22. YIN, R. K. (1969) Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141-145.