Doctoral students' responses to writing critique: Messages for teachers

Journal of Nursing Education

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 149-155

  Eyres, Sandra J ^a   Hatch, Deborah H ^b   Turner, Susan B ^b   West, Maureen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING RESEARCH; REVIEW; TEACHING; UNITED STATES; WRITING;

AUTHORSHIP; EDUCATION, NURSING, GRADUATE; FEMALE; HUMANS; NURSING RESEARCH; PACIFIC STATES; TEACHING;

EID: 0035318705     PISSN: 00223158     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bishop, W. (1988). Helping peer writing groups succeed. Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 15(2), 120-125.
2. Bizzell, P. (1984). William Perry and liberal education. College English, 46(5), 447-454.
3. Bizzell, P. (1986). What happens when basic writers come to college? College Composition and Communication, 37(3), 294-301.
4. Bruffee, K.A. (1978). The Brooklyn plan: Attaining intellectual growth through peer-group tutoring. Liberal Education, 64(4), 447-468.
5. Elbow, P. (1997). High stakes and low stakes in assigning and responding to writing. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 69, 5-13.
6. Fulwiler, T. (1984). How well does writing across the curriculum work? College English, 46(2), 113-125.
7. Hairston, M. (1982). The winds of change: Thomas Kuhn and the revolution in the teaching of writing. College Composition and Communication, 33(2), 76-88.
8. Harris, M. (1987). The ins and outs of conferencing. Writing Instructor, 6(2), 87-96.
9. Harris, M. (1995). Talking in the middle: Why writers need writing tutors. College English, 57(1), 27-42.
10. Herrington, A.J. (1997). Developing and responding to major writing projects. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 69, 67-75.
11. Lunsford, R.F. (1997). When less is more: Principles for responding in the disciplines. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 69, 91-104.
12. Maimon, E. (1980). Cinderella to Hercules: Demythologizing writing across the curriculum. Journal of Basic Writing, 2(4), 3-11.
13. MacDonald, S.P. (1987). Problem definition in academic writing. College English, 49(3), 315-331.
14. MacDonald, S.P. (1989). Data-driven and conceptually driven academic discourse. Written Communication, 6(4), 411-435.
15. McLeod, S. (1987a). Defining writing across the curriculum. WPA: Writing Program Administration, 11(2), 19-24.
16. McLeod, S. (1987b). Some thoughts about feelings: The affective domain and the writing process. College Composition and Communication, 38(4), 426-434.
17. Sommers, N. (1982). Responding to student writing. College Composition and Communication, 33(2), 148-156.
18. Straub, R. (1997). Students' reactions to teacher comments: An exploratory study. Research in the Teaching of English, 31(1), 91-119.
19. Walvoord, B.E. (1996). The future of WAC. College English, 58(1), 58-79.
20. Writing Consulting: Faculty Resources. 1999. University of Kansas [On-line]. Available: (http://www.ukans.edu/∼write/ docs/assignment_design.html.