Random amplified polymorphic DNA fingerprints for identification of species in poultry pâté

Poultry Science

Volumn 80, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 522-524

  Calvo, J H ^a   Zaragoza, P ^a   Osta, R ^a  

^a Lab Genet Bioquim Grupos S   (Spain)

Author keywords

Authentification; DNA fingerprint; P t ; Pig; Poultry

Indexed keywords

ANAS SP.; ANSER SP.; SUS SCROFA;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; CHICKEN; DNA FINGERPRINTING; DUCK; FOOD; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GOOSE; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; RANDOM AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SWINE; TURKEY (BIRD);

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; CHICKENS; DNA FINGERPRINTING; DUCKS; GEESE; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; POULTRY PRODUCTS; RANDOM AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNA TECHNIQUE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; SWINE; TURKEYS; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 0035315879     PISSN: 00325791     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ps/80.4.522     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Ashoor, S. H., W. C. Monten, and P. G. Stiles, 1998. Liquid Chromatographic identification of meats. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 71:397-403.
2. Borgo, R., C. Soulie-Crosset, D. Bouchon, and L. Gomot, 1996. PCR-RFLP analysis of mitochondrial DNA for identification of snail meat species. J. Food Sci. 61:1-4.
3. Chikuni, K., T. Tabata, M. Kosugiyama, and S. Kato, 1990. Species identification of cooked meats by DNA hybridization assay. Meat Sci. 27:119-128.
4. Ebbehoj, K. F., and P. D. Thomsen, 1991. Differentiation of closely related species by DNA hybridization. Meat Sci. 30:359-366.
5. Hsieh, Y. H., S. C. Sheu, and R. C. Bridgman, 1998. Development of a monoclonal antibody specific to cooked mammalian meats. J. Food Prot. 61:476-481.
6. Jones, S. L., and R.L.S. Patterson, 1985. Double antibody ELISA for detection of trace amounts of pig meat in raw meat mixtures. Meat Sci. 15:1-13.
7. Kim, H., and L. A. Shelef, 1986. Characterization and identification of raw beef, pork, chicken and turkey meats by electrophoretic patterns of their sarcoplasmic proteins. J. Food Sci. 51:731-741.
8. Lahiri, D. K., S. Bye, J. I. Nurnberger, Jr., M. E. Hodes, and M. Crisp, 1992. A non-organic and non-enzymatic extraction method gives higher yields of genomic DNA from whole blood samples than do nine other methods tested. J. Biochem. Methods 25:193-202.
9. Lee, J. C., and J. G. Chang, 1994. Random amplified polymorphic DNA polymerase chain reaction (RAPD PCR) fingerprints in forensic species identification. Forensic Sci. Int. 67:103-107.
10. Meyer, R., C. Hofelein, J. Luthy, and U. Candrian, 1995. Polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis: A simple method for species identification in food. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 78:1542-1551.
11. Murray, B. W., R. A. McClymont, and C. Strobeck, 1995. Forensic identification of ungulate species using restriction digests of PCR-amplified mitochondrial DNA. J. Forensic Sci. 40:943-951.
12. Rossen, L., K. Norskov, K. Holmstrom, and O. F. Rasmussen, 1992. Inhibition of PCR by components of food samples, microbial diagnostic assays and DNA extractions solutions. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 17:37-45.
13. Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis, 1989. Molecular cloning. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.
14. Skarpeid, H. J., K. Kvaal, and K. I. Hildrum, 1998. Identification of animal species in ground meat mixtures by multivariate analysis of isoelectricfocusing protein profiles. Electrophoresis 19:3103-3109.
15. Wintero, A. K., P. D Thomsen, and W. Davies, 1990. A comparison of DNA-hybridization, immunodiffusion, countercurrent immunoelectrophoresis and isoelectric focusing for detecting the admixture of pork to beef. Meat Sc. 27:75-85.