The enigma of consent

Clinical Medicine

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 118-120

  Marks, Peter ^a  

^a NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EUROPE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; LEGAL APPROACH; LEGAL ASPECT; MALE; MENTAL CAPACITY; PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; RISK FACTOR;

LEGAL APPROACH; PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;

EUROPE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; MENTAL COMPETENCY; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 0035287020     PISSN: 14702118     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.1-2-118     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. DPP v Morgan (1976) AC 182, 61 Cr App Rep 136 HL.
2. Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 1976.
3. Reibl v Hughes (1978) 89 DLR (3d) 112, (1981) 114 DLR (3d).
4. Hopp v Lepp (1980) 2 SCR 192 208, 112 DLR (3d) 67 85.
5. Schloendorff v Society of New York Hospital (1914) 211 NY 125.
6. Sidaway v Board of Governors of Bethlem Royal Hospital (1985) 1 All ER 643, (1985) AC 871, (1985) 2 WLR 480 HL.
7. Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee (1957) 2 ALL ER 118.
8. Hoyte P. Basic principles of consent: points for consideration. Hospital Medicine 1998;59:236.
9. Segest E. The legal position with regard to informed consent in Denmark. Med Law 1985;14:245-54.
10. Medical Act in Denmark (Law 426 of 19 August 1987) the latest revision of which came into force on 1 October 1992.
11. National Board of Health Medical Practitioners' Duty and the Patients' Rights, circular regarding information and consent of 21 October 1982.
12. National Board of Health Medical Practitioners' Duty and the Patients' Rights, circular regarding information and consent of 22 September 1992.
13. Segest E, Petersen F. Evaluation of the physicians' obligations to provide information in Denmark. Med Law 1988;7:141-9.
14. Entscheidungen des Bundesgerichtshof in Zivilsachen. Reports of the Federal Supreme Court in Civil Cases 1951.20.61.
15. Deutsch E. The protection of the person in medical research in Germany. Med Law 1999;18:77-92.
16. Jung A. Die Zulässigkeit biomedizinischer Versuche am Menschen. Heymann, 1996.
17. The Plaintiffs v. UK Medical Research Council and Secretary of State for Health. Bull Med Ethics 1996;November:16.
18. Entscheidungen des Bundesgerichtshof in Zivilsachen. Reports of the Federal Supreme Court in Civil Cases 1951.20.62.
19. Henry A, Cohen G, Richie C. Les essais therapeutiques. La relation 'médecin malade' a travers la loi du 20 décembre 1988. Psychologie Médicale 1990;22:516-18.
20. Applebaum PC, Grisso T. Assessing patient's capacities to consent to treatment. N Engl J Med 1988;319:1635.