Developments and paradigms in intonation research

Speech Communication

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 263-296

  Botinis, Antonis ^a   Granström, Bjorn ^b   Möbius, Bernd ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SKÖVDE   (Sweden)

^b ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA STRUCTURES; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH SYNTHESIS;

INTONATION RESEARCH;

SPEECH COMMUNICATION;

EID: 0035283534     PISSN: 01676393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-6393(00)00060-1     Document Type: Article

References (178)

1. Adriaens, L.M.H., 1991. Ein Modell Deutscher Intonation. Ph.D. Dissertation, Technical University Eindhoven.
2. Atal B.S. Automatic speaker recognition based on pitch contours. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 52:1972;1687-1697.
3. Atkinson J.A. Correlation analysis of the physiological factors controlling fundamental voice frequency. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 63:1978;211-222.
4. Bannert R. Towards a model for German prosody. Folia Linguistica. XIX:1985;321-341.
5. Bannert R. P. å Väg mot Svenskt Uttal:1990;Studentlitteratur, Lund.
6. Bannert R., Thorsen N. Empirische Studien zur Intonation des Deutschen und Dänischen: Ähnlichkeiten und Unterschiede. Kopenhagener Beiträge zur Germanistischen Linguistik. 24:1988;26-50.
7. Beckman, M.E., Ayers, M., 1997. (3rd version). Guidelines for ToBI labelling. Department of Linguistics, The Ohio State University ( URL:http://www.ling.ohio-state.edu/phonetics/E_ToBI ).
8. Beckman, M.E., Pierrehumbert, J.B., 1986. Intonation structure in Japanese and English. In: Phonology Yearbook, Vol. 3, pp. 255-309.
9. Bell, A.G., 1879. Vowel theories. American Journal of Otology 1, 163-180. Reprinted in: Bell, A.G. (Ed.), 1916. The Mechanisms of Speech. 8th ed. Funk and Wagnalls, New York, pp. 117-129.
10. Bell, A.G., 1879. Vowel theories. American Journal of Otology 1, 163-180. Reprinted in: Bell, A.G. (Ed.), 1916. The Mechanisms of Speech. 8th ed. Funk and Wagnalls, New York, pp. 117-129.
11. Berinstein, A.E., 1979. A cross linguistic study of perception and production of stress. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, pp. 1-59.
12. Bertenstam, J., Granström, B., Gustafson, K., Hunnicutt, S., Karlsson, I., Meurlinger, C., Nord, L., Rosengren, E., 1997. The VAESS communicator: a portable communication aid with new voice types and emotions. Phonum 4, Department of Phonetics, Ume å University, Sweden, pp. 57-60.
13. Bloomfield L. Language. 1933;Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
14. Bolinger D.L. A theory of pitch accent in English. Word. 14:1958;109-149.
15. Botinis A. Stress and Prosodic Structure in Greek. 1989;Lund University Press, Lund.
16. Botinis A. Accentual distribution in Greek discourse. Travaux de l'Institut de Phonétique d'Aix. 14:1992;13-52.
17. Botinis A. Intonation in Greek. Hirst D., Di Cristo A. Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages. 1998;288-310 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
18. Botinis, A., Bannert, R., 1997. Tonal perception of focus in Greek and Swedish. In: Proceedings of the ESCA Workshop on Intonation. Athens, Greece, pp. 47-50.
19. Botinis, A., Erkenborn, S., Isacsson, C., Westin, P., 1999. Prosodic variability and segmental durations in Greek and Swedish. In: Proceedings of the Swedish Phonetics Conference Fonetik 99. Gothenburg, Sweden, pp. 41-44.
20. Brazil D., Coulthard M., Johns C. Discourse Intonation and Language Teaching. 1980;Longman, London.
21. Brazil D., Hewings M., Cauldwell R. The Communicative Value of Intonation in English. 1997;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
22. Bresnan J. Sentence stress and syntactic transformations. Language. 47:1971;257-280.
23. Brown G., Yule G. Discourse Analysis. 1983;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
24. Brown G., Currie K., Kenworthy J. Questions of Intonation. 1980;Croom Helm, London.
25. Bruce G. Swedish Word Accents in Sentence Perspective. 1977;Gleerup, Lund.
26. Bruce, G., 1998. Allmän och Svensk Prosodi. In: Practical Linguistics, Vol. 16. Department of Linguistics, Lund University.
27. Bruce G., G å rding E. A prosodic typology for Swedish dialects. G å rding E., Bruce G., Bannert R. Nordic Prosody. 1978;219-228 Gleerup, Lund.
28. Bruce, G., Granström, B., Gustafson, K., House, D., 1993. Prosodic phrasing in Swedish. In: Proceedings of the ESCA Workshop on Prosody, Lund, Sweden, pp. 180-183.
29. Carlson R., Granström B., Hunnicutt S. Multi-language text-to-speech development and applications. Ainsworth Advances in Speech, Hearing, and Language Processing. 1990;269-296 JAI Press, London.
30. Chomsky N. Deep structure, surface structure and semantic interpretation. Chomsky N. Studies on Semantics on Generative Grammar. 1972;62-119 Mouton, The Hague.
31. Collier R. Physiological correlates of intonation patterns. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 58:1975;249-255.
32. Cooper W.E., Sorensen J.M. Fundamental Frequency in Sentence Production. 1981;Springer, New York.
33. Cruttenden A. Intonation. 2nd ed:1997;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
34. Cutler A., Ladd D.R. Prosody: Models and Measurements. 1983;Springer, Heidelberg.
35. D'Alessandro C., Mertens P. Automatic pitch contour stylisation using a model of tonal perception. Comput. Speech Language. 9:1995;257-288.
36. Danes F. Sentence intonation from a functional point of view. Word. 16:1960;34-54.
37. de Pijper J.R. Modelling British English Intonation. 1983;Foris, Dordrecht.
38. Di Cristo A. Intonation in French. Hirst D., Di Cristo A. Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages. 1998;195-218 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
39. Di Cristo A., Hirst D. Modelling French micromelody: analysis and synthesis. Phonetica. 43:1986;11-30.
40. Di Cristo, A., Di Cristo, Ph., Campione, E., Véronis, J., 2000. A prosodic model for text-to-speech synthesis in French. In: Botinis, A. (Ed.), Intonation: Analysis, Modelling and Technology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (in press).
41. Fant, G., Kruckenberg, A., Liljencrants, J., 2000. acoustic-phonetic prominence in Swedish. In: Botinis, A. (Ed.), Intonation: Analysis, Modelling and Technology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (in press).
42. 0 in tense and lax vowels with specific reference to German Phonetica. 47:1990;99-140.
43. Fourakis M., Botinis A., Katsaiti M. Acoustic characteristics of Greek vowels. Phonetica. 56:1999;28-43.
44. Fry D.B. Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech. 1:1958;126-152.
45. Fujisaki H. Dynamic characteristics of voice fundamental frequency in speech and singing. MacNeilage P.F. The Production of Speech. 1983;39-55 Springer, New York.
46. Fujisaki H. A note on the physiological and physical basis for the phrase and accent components in the voice fundamental frequency contour. Fujimura O. Vocal Physiology: Voice Production, Mechanisms and Functions. 1988;347-355 Raven, New York.
47. Garde P. L'Accent. 1968;Press Universitaires, Paris.
48. G å rding E. The Scandinavian Word Accents. 1977a;Gleerup, Lund.
49. G å rding, E., 1977b. The importance of turning points for the pitch patterns of Swedish accents. In: Hyman, L.M. (Ed.), Studies in Stress and Accent. Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics 4, Los Angeles, pp. 27-35.
50. G å rding E. A generative model of intonation. Cutler A., Ladd D.R. Prosody: Models and Measurements. 1983;11-25 Springer, Berlin.
51. G å rding, E., Botinis, A., Touati, P., 1982. A comparative study of Swedish, Greek and French intonation. Working Papers 22, Department of Linguistics & Phonetics, Lund University, pp. 137-153.
52. Gimson A.C. An Introduction to the Pronunciation of English. 1962;Arlond, London.
53. Goldsmith, J.A., 1976a. Autosegmental Phonology. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT (distributed by IULC and published 1979 by Garland Press, New York).
54. Goldsmith J.A. An overview of autosegmental phonology. Linguistic Analysis. 2:1976b;23-68.
55. Goldsmith J.A. Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology. 1990;Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
56. Grønnum (Thorsen) N. The Groundworks of Danish Intonation: An Introduction. 1992;Museum Tusculanum Press, Copenhagen.
57. Grønnum (Thorsen), N., 1995. Superposition and subordination in intonation - a non-linear approach. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Congress - Phon. Sc. Stockholm, pp. 124-131.
58. Grønnum (Thorsen) N. Intonation in Danish. Hirst D., Di Cristo A. Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages. 1998;131-151 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
59. Gussenhoven C. On the Grammar and Semantics of Sentence Accents. 1984;Foris, Dordrecht.
60. Hadding-Koch K. Acoustico-phonetic Studies in the Intonation of Southern Swedish. 1961;Gleerup, Lund.
61. Hadding-Koch K., Studdert-Kennedy M. An experimental study of some intonation contours. Phonetica. 1:1964;175-185.
62. Halliday M.A.K Notes on transitivity and theme in English. J. Linguist. 3:1967;199-244.
63. Hamon, C., Moulines, E., Charpentier, F., 1989. A diphone system based on time-domain prosodic modifications of speech. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 89, pp. 238-241.
64. Helmholtz, H., 1877. On the Sensations of Tone (translated by Ellis, A.J., 1885, Dover, New York).
65. Hirschberg, J., Pierrehumbert, J., 1986. The intonational structuring of discourse. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the Association Computational Linguistics. New York, pp. 136-144.
66. Hirst D. Detaching intonation phrases from syntactic structure. Linguist. Inquiry. 24:1993;781-788.
67. Hirst D., Di Cristo A. Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages. 1998a;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
68. Hirst D., Di Cristo A. A survey of intonation systems. Hirst D., Di Cristo A. Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages. 1998b;1-44 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
69. Hirst, D.J., Ide, N., Véronis, J., 1994. Coding fundamental frequency patterns for multi-lingual synthesis with INTSINT in the MULTEXT project. In: Proceedings of the Second ESCA/IEEE Workshop on Speech Synthesis. New Paltz, NY, pp. 77-80.
70. 0 of a continuous text in French: an experimental approach. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Congress - Phon. Sc. Aix-en-Provence. France, pp. 234-237.
71. Hockett C.F. A Manual of Phonology. 1955;Waverley Press, Baltimore.
72. Hombert J.M. Consonant types, vowel quality, and tone. Fromkin V.A. Tone: A Linguistic Survey. 1978;77-111 Academic Press, New York.
73. House D. Tonal Perception in Speech. 1990;Lund University Press, Lund.
74. Hyman, L.M., 1977. On the nature of linguistic stress. In: Hyman, L.M. (Ed.), Studies in Stress and Accent. Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics 4, Los Angeles, pp. 37-82.
75. Jackendoff R. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. 1972;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
76. Jones D. Outline of English Phonetics. 8th ed:1956;Heffer, Cambridge.
77. Jun, S.-A., Fougeron, C., 2000. A phonological model of French intonation. In: Botinis, A. (Ed.), Intonation: Analysis, Modelling and Technology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (in press).
78. Koenig W., Dunn H.K., Lacy L.Y. The sound spectrograph. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 18:1946;19-49.
79. 0 peaks. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Congress - Phon. Sc. Tallinn, pp. 149-152.
80. 0 in the synthesis of intonation Kingston J., Beckman M.E. Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the Grammar and Physics of Speech. 1990;115-138 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
81. Kohler K.J. Prosody in speech synthesis: the interplay between basic research and TTS application. J. Phonetics. 19:1991;121-138.
82. Ladd D.R. Phonological features of intonational peaks. Language. 59:1983;721-759.
83. Ladd D.R. Declination 'reset' and the hierarchical organization of utterances. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 84:1988;530-544.
84. Ladd D.R. Intonational Phonology. 1996;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
85. Ladefoged P. Three Areas of Experimental Phonetics. 1967;Oxford University Press, London.
86. Ladefoged P., McKinney N.P. Loudness, sound pressure and sub-glottal pressure in speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 35:1963;454-460.
87. Lambrecht K. Information Structure and Sentence Form. 1996;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
88. Lea W.A. Prosodic aids to speech recognition. Lea W.A. Trends in Speech Recognition. 1980;166-205 Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
89. Leben W. The tones in English intonation. Linguist. Anal. 2:1976;69-107.
90. Lehiste I. Suprasegmentals. 1970;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
91. Liberman M.Y., Pierrehumbert J. Intonational invariants under changes in pitch range and length. Aronoff M., Oehrle R.T. Language Sound Structure. 1984;157-233 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
92. Liberman M.Y., Prince A. On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry. 8:1977;249-336.
93. Lieberman Ph. Intonation, Perception, and Language. 1967;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
94. Lieske, C., Bos, J., Gambäck, B., Emele, M., Rupp, C.J., 1997. Giving prosody a meaning. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology Eurospeech 97. Rhodes, Greece, pp. 1431-1434.
95. Malfrère, F., Dutoit, T., Mertens, P., 1998. Automatic prosody generation using suprasegmental unit selection. In: Proceedings of the Third ESCA Workshop on Speech Synthesis. Jenolan Caves, Australia, pp. 323-328.
96. Malmberg B. Structural Linguistics and Human Communication. 1967;Springer, New York.
97. Martinet A. Accent et tons. Miscellanea Phonetica. 2:1954;13-24.
98. Matsui, T., Furui, S., 1990. Text-independent speaker recognition using vocal tract and pitch information. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing 90. Kobe, Japan, pp. 137-140.
99. Meron, Y., Hirose, K., 1996. Language training system utilising speech modification. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing 96. Philadelphia, PA, pp. 1449-1452.
100. Mertens, P., 1987. L'intonation du Frana̧is: de la description linguistique à la reconnaissance automatique. PhD Dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven.
101. Mertens, P., 1989. Automatic recognition of intonation in French and Dutch. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Speech Comminication and Technology Eurospeech Eurospeech 89. Paris, pp. 46-49.
102. Meyer, E.A., 1937. Die Intonation im Schwedischen I: Die Sveamundarten. Studies Scand. Philol. 10, University of Stockholm.
103. Meyer, E.A., 1954. Die Intonation im Schwedischen II: Die norrländischen Mundarten. Studies Scand. Philol. 11, University of Stockholm.
104. Möbius, B., 1993. Ein quantitatives Modell der deutschen Intonation: Analyse und Synthese von Grundfrequenzverläufen. Niemeyer: Tübingen.
105. Möbius, B., 1995. Components of a quantitative model of German intonation. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Congress - Phon. Sc. Stockholm. Sweden, pp. 108-115.
106. Möhler G. Theoriebasierte Modellierung der deutschen Intonation für die Sprachsynthese. 1998a;University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart.
107. Möhler, G., 1998b. IMS Festival ( http://www.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/phonetik/synthesis/index.html ).
108. Monaghan A.I.C. What determines accentuation? J. Pragmat. 19:1993;559-584.
109. Monaghan, A.I.C., 1998. State-of-the-art summary of European synthetic prosody R&D ( http://www.compapp.dcu.ie/ alex/PUB/soap.html ).
110. Monaghan A.I.C., Ladd D.R. Symbolic output as the basis for evaluating intonation in text-to-speech systems. Speech Communication. 9:1990;305-314.
111. Morlec Y., Bailly G., Aubergé V. Generating prosodic attitudes in French: Data, model and evaluation. Speech Communication. 33(4):2001;357-371.
112. Morton, K., Tatham, M., 1995. Pragmatic effects in speech synthesis. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology Eurospeech 95. Madrid, Spain, pp. 1819-1822.
113. Nespor M., Vogel I. Prosodic Phonology. 1986;Foris, Dordrecht.
114. Nickerson R.S., Kalikow D.N., Stevens K.N. Computer-aided speech training for the deaf. J. Speech Hearing Disorders. 41:1976;120-132.
115. Niemann, H., Nöth, E., Kie β ling, A., Kompe, R., Batliner, A., 1997. Prosodic Processing and its use in Verbmobil. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 97. München, Germany, pp. 75-789.
116. Nilsonne, Å. , 1987. Speech in depression: a methodological study of prosody. Ph.D. Dissertation, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm.
117. Nord N., Hammarberg B., Lundström E. Laryngectomee speech in noise - voice effort, speech rate and intelligibility. Scand. J. Logopedics Phoniatrics. 20:1995;107-112.
118. Odé C. Russian Intonation: A Perceptual Description. 1989;Rodopi, Amsterdam.
119. Ohala J.J. Production of tone. Fromkin V.A. Tone: A Linguistic Survey. 1978;5-39 Academic Press, New York.
120. Öhman, S.E.G., 1967. Word and sentence intonation: a quantitative model. STL-QPSR 2-3, 20-54.
121. Öhman, S.E.G., Lindqvist, J., 1966. Analysis-by-synthesis of prosodic pitch contours. STL-QPSR 4, 1-6.
122. Öster, A.-M., 1997. Auditory and visual feedback in spoken L2 teaching. Phonum 4, Department of Phonetics, Ume å University, Sweden, pp. 145-148.
123. Parris, E., Carey, M. 1996. Language independent gender identification. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 96. Atlanta GE, pp. 685-688.
124. Pierrehumbert, J.B., 1980. The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. PhD Dissertation, MIT, MA (Published in 1988 by IULC).
125. Pierrehumbert J.B., Beckman M.E. Japanese Tone Structure. 1988;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
126. Pike K.L. The Intonation of American English. 1945;University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
127. Potter R.K. Visible patterns of science. Science. 102:1945;463-470.
128. Potter R.K., Kopp G.A., Green H.C. Visible Speech. 1947;Van Nostrand, New York.
129. Risberg A. Visual aids for speech correction. Amer. Ann. Deaf. 1976;178-194.
130. Rooney, E., Hiller, S., Laver, J., Jack, M., 1992. Prosodic features for automated pronunciation improvement in the SPELL system. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing 92. Banff, Alberta, pp. 413-416.
131. Rossi M. Interaction of intensity glides and frequency glissandos. Language and Speech. 21:1978;284-396.
132. Rossi M. L'intonation et l'organisation de l' énoncé Phonetica. 42:1985;135-153.
133. Rossi M. L'Intonation, le Système du Francais: Description et Modélisation. 1999;Editions Ophrys, Paris.
134. Rossi, M., 2000. Intonation: past, present, future. In: Botinis, A. (Ed.), Intonation: Analysis, Modelling and Technology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (in press).
135. Searle J.R. Speech Acts. 1969;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
136. Searle J.R. A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society. 5:1976;1-23.
137. Searle J.R. Expression and Meaning. 1979;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
138. Silkerk E.O. Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. 1984;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
139. Silverman, K., 1987. The Structure and Processing of Fundamental Frequency Contours. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
140. Silverman, K., Beckman, M., Pitrelli, J., Ostendorf, M., Wightman, C., Price, P., Pierrehumbert, J., Hirschberg, J., 1992. ToBI: A standard for labelling English prosody. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing 92. Banff, Alberta, pp. 867-870.
141. Stockwell R.P. The role of intonation: reconsiderations and other considerations. Bolinger D.L. Intonation. 1972;87-109 Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.
142. Sundström, A., 1997. Speech technology in language learning. M.Sc. thesis, KTH, Stockholm (in Swedish).
143. Tams, A., Tatham, M., 1995. Describing speech styles using prosody. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology Eurospeech 95. Madrid, Spain, pp. 2081-2084.
144. Tatham, M., Morton, K., 1995. Speech synthesis in dialogue systems. In: Dalsgaard, P. (Ed.), Spoken Dialogue Systems. (Visgo, Denmark, ESCA, 1995), pp. 221-225.
145. Tatham, M., Morton, K., 2000. Speech prosodics for synthesis - perspectives. In: Proceedings of the Swedish Phonetics Conference Fonetik 2000. Skövde, Sweden, pp. 133-136.
146. Taylor P.A. A Phonetic Model of Intonation in English. 1994;Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.
147. Taylor P.A. Analysis and synthesis of intonation using the Tilt model. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 107:2000;1697-1714.
148. Terken J. Synthesizing natural - sounding intonation for Dutch: rules and perceptual evaluation. Comput Speech Language. 7:1993;27-48.
149. t'Hart J. Intonation in Dutch. Hirst D., Di Cristo A. Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages. 1998;96-111 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
150. t'Hart J., Collier R. Integrating different levels of intonation analysis. J. Phonetics. 3:1975;235-255.
151. t'Hart J., Collier R., Cohen A. A perceptual Study of Intonation. 1990;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
152. Thorsen (Grønnum) N. An acoustical analysis of Danish intonation. J. Phonetics. 6:1978;151-175.
153. 0 timing in languages where pitch cues stress Phonetica. 39:1982;302-316.
154. Thymé-Gobbel, A., Hutchins, S., 1996. On using prosodic cues in automatic language identification. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing 96, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 1768-1771.
155. Trager G.L., Smith H.L. An Outline of English Structure. 1951;Battenburg Press, Norman, Oklahoma.
156. Trubetzkoy, 1939. Grundzüge der Phonologie (translated 1969 by Baltaxe, C.A.M. Principles of Phonology, University of California Press, Berkley).
157. Vaissière J. Phonetic explanations for cross-linguistic similarities. Phonetica. 52:1995;123-130.
158. Van Geel, R., 1983. Pitch inflection in electrolaryngeal speech. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Utrecht.
159. Van Hemert J.P., Adriaens-Porzig U., Adriaens L.M. Speech synthesis in the SPICOS project. Tillmann H.G., Willée G. Analyse und Synthese Gesprochener Sprache. 1987;34-39 Olms, Hildesheim.
160. Van Heuven, V.J., Haan, J., 2000. Phonetic correlates of statement versus question intonation in Dutch. In: Botinis, A. (Ed.), Intonation: Analysis, Modelling and Technology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (in press).
161. Van Heuven V.J., Pols L.C.W. Analysis and Synthesis of Speech. 1993;Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin and New York.
162. Van Santen J.P.H. Perceptual experiments for diagnostic testing of text-to-speech systems. Comput. Speech Language. 7:1993;49-100.
163. Van Santen, J.P.H., Hirschberg, J., 1994. Segmental effects on timing and height of pitch contours. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing 94, Yokohama, pp. 719-722.
164. Van Santen, J.P.H., Möbius, B., 1997. Modelling pitch accent curves. In: Proceedings of the ESCA Workshop on Intonation. Athens, Greece, pp. 321-324.
165. 0 generation and alignment. In: Botinis, A. (Ed.), Intonation: Analysis, Modelling and Technology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (in press).
166. Van Santen, J.P.H., Möbius, B., Venditti, J., Shih, C., 1998. Description of the Bell Labs intonation system. In: Proceedings of the Third ESCA Workshop on Speech Synthesis. Jenolan Caves, Australia, pp. 293-298.
167. Venditti, J.J., Maeda, K., van Santen, J.P.H., 1998. Modelling Japanese boundary pitch movements for speech synthesis. In: Proceedings of the Third ESCA Workshop on Speech Synthesis. Jenolan Caves, Australia, pp. 317-322.
168. Véronis, J., Campione, E., 1998. Towards a reversible symbolic coding of intonation. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing 98. Sidney, pp. 2899-2902.
169. Véronis J., Di Cristo Ph., Courtois F., Chaumette C. A stochastic model of intonation for text-to-speech synthesis. Speech Communication. 26:1998;233-244.
170. Wang, H.D., Degryse, D., Carraro, F., 1993. A prosody modification approach for auditory user feedback in the SPELL pronunciation teaching system. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology Eurospeech 93. Berlin, pp. 991-994.
171. Weltens B., de Bot K. The visualisation of pitch contours: some aspects of its effectiveness in teaching foreign languages. Speech Communication. 3:1984;157-163.
172. 0 of vowels J. Phonetics. 23:1995;349-366.
173. Wheatstone, C., 1837. Reed organ pipes, speaking machines, etc. Westminster Review 27, 30-37 (reprinted in Scientific Papers of Sir Charles Wheatstone, 1879. Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 48-367).
174. Wheatstone, C., 1837. Reed organ pipes, speaking machines, etc. Westminster Review 27, 30-37 (reprinted in Scientific Papers of Sir Charles Wheatstone, 1879. Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 48-367).
175. Willems N., Collier R., t'Hart J. A synthesis scheme for British English intonation. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 84:1988;1250-1261.
176. Xu Y. Contextual tonal variations in Mandarin. J. Phonetics. 25:1997;61-83.
177. 0 contours J. Phonetics. 27:1999;55-105.
178. Xu Y., Wang E. Pitch targets and their realization: Evidence from Mandarin Chinese. Speech Communication. 33(4):2001;319-337.