Wetting of a symmetrical binary fluid mixture on a wall

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 63, Issue 3, 2001, Pages

  Wilding, N B ^c,d  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR POLYMER RESEARCH   (Germany)

^b BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPOSITION EFFECTS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MIXING; SUBSTRATES; THERMAL EFFECTS; WETTING;

SYMMETRICAL BINARY FLUID MIXTURES;

BINARY MIXTURES;

EID: 0035278269     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.63.031201     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. L. D. Gelb, K. E. Gubbins, R. Radhakrishnan, and M. Sliwinska-Bartkowiak, Rep. Prog. Phys. 62, 1573 (1999).
2. For reviews on wetting see P. G. de Gennes, Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 827 (1985);
3. M. Schick, in Les Houches, Session XLVIII-Liquids at Interfaces, edited by J. Charvolin, J. F. Joanny, and J. Zinn-Justin (Elsevier, B.V., 1990);and Ref. 10
4. M. N. Barber, in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, C. Domb, and J. L. Lebowitz (Academic, New York, 1983), Vol. 8, p. 145;
5. V. Privman, in Finite Size Scaling and Numerical Simulation of Statistical Systems, edited by V. Privman (World Scientific, Singapore, 1990).
6. M. P. Nightingale and J. O. Indekeu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1824 (1985);
7. Phys. Rev. Lett.M. P. NightingaleJ. O. Indekeu55, 1700 (1985);
8. M. Krech, Phys. Rev. E 56, 1642 (1997);
9. M. KrechJ. Phys.: Condens. Matter 11, R391 (1999).
10. N. B. Wilding and M. Krech, Phys. Rev. E 57, 5795 (1998).
11. A. Mukhopadhyay and B. M. Law, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 772 (1999).
12. N. B. Wilding, F. Schmid, and P. Nielaba, Phys. Rev. E 58, 2201 (1998).
13. M. E. Fisher and P. J. Upton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2402 (1990);
14. M. E. Fisher and M. C. Barbosa, Phys. Rev. B 43, 11 177 (1991).
15. N. B. Wilding, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1488 (1997);
16. N. B. WildingPhys. Rev. E 55, 6624 (1997).
17. S. Dietrich, in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, edited by C. Domb and J. L. Lebowitz (Academic Press, New York, 1988), Vol. 12, p. 1.
18. S. Dietrich and M. Schick, Phys. Rev. B 33, 4952 (1985).
19. I. Hadjiagapiou and R. Evans, Mol. Phys. 54, 383 (1985).
20. E. Kierlik, M. L. Rosinberg, Y. Fan, and P. Monson, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 10 947 (1994).
21. Y. Fan, J. E. Finn, and P. A. Monson, J. Chem. Phys. 99, 8238 (1993).
22. A. Plech, U. Klemradt, M. Huber, and J. Peisl, Europhys. Lett. 49, 583 (2000).
23. See, e.g., M. J. P. Nijmeijer and J. J. Weis, in Annual Reviews of Computational Physics IV (World Scientific, Singapore, 1996), and references therein.
24. E. H. Hauge, Phys. Rev. B 33, 3322 (1986).
25. J. M. J. Leeuwen and E. H. Hauge, J. Stat. Phys. 87, 1335 (1997);
26. F. Clarysse and J. O. Indekeu, Physica A 251, 70 (1998).
27. D. M. Kroll and G. Gompper, Phys. Rev. B 36, 7078 (1987);
28. Phys. Rev. BG. Gompper and D. M. Kroll, 38, 459 (1988).
29. F. F. Haas, F. Schmid, and K. Binder, Phys. Rev. B 61, 15 077 (2000).
30. C. J. Walden, B. L. Gyorffy, and A. O. Parry, Phys. Rev. B 42, 798 (1990).
31. S. Dietrich and M. Schick, Surf. Sci. 382, 178 (1997).
32. Quantitative difference, e.g., in the prefactors, are due to the fact that the underlying potentials (Formula presented) differ from each other.
33. J. Israelachvili, Intermolecular and Surface Forces (Academic, London, 1992).
34. D. Frenkel and B. Smit, Understanding Molecular Simulation (Academic, London, 1996).
35. D. Nicolaides and R. Evans, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 778 (1989).
36. J. E. Finn and P. A. Monson, Phys. Rev. A 39, 6402 (1989).
37. Y. Fan and P. A. Monson, J. Chem. Phys. 99, 6897 (1993).
38. H. Kellay, D. Bonn, and J. Meunier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 2607 (1993).
39. R. Pandit and M. E. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1772 (1983);
40. Phys. Rev. Lett.J. Krim, J. G. Dash, and J. Suzanne, 52, 640 (1984).