The time-factor in orthodontics: What influences the duration of treatments in National Health Service practices?

Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 62-72

  Turbill, Elizabeth A ^a   Richmond, Stephen ^b   Wright, Jean L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WALES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Appliance type; Complexity; Duration; Orthodontic treatment; Standards

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; AGE; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLASSIFICATION; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DENTAL CARE; EVALUATION; GENERAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; MALOCCLUSION; METHODOLOGY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SOCIAL CLASS; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADOLESCENT; AGE FACTORS; BICUSPID; CHILD; COMMUNITY DENTISTRY; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; DENTAL SERVICE, HOSPITAL; ENGLAND; GENERAL PRACTICE, DENTAL; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALOCCLUSION; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SERIAL EXTRACTION; SOCIAL CLASS; STATE MEDICINE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WALES;

EID: 0035256374     PISSN: 03015661     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0528.2001.00010.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Turbill EA, Richmond S, Wright JL. A critical assessment of high-earning orthodontists in the General Dental Services of England and Wales (1990-1991). Br J Orthod 1998;25:47-54.
2. Linge L, Linge BO. Patient characteristics and treatment variables associated with apical root resorption during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthoped 1991;99:35-43.
3. Vig PS, Weintraub JA, Brown C, Kowalski CJ. The dura- tion of orthodontic treatment with and without extractions: a pilot study of five selected practices. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthoped 1990;27:45-51.
4. Fink DF, Smith RJ. The duration of orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthoped 1992;102:45-51.
5. Taylor PJS, Kerr WJS. Factors associated with the standard and duration of orthodontic treatment. Br J Orthod 1996;23:335-41.
6. O'Brien KD, Robbins R, Vig KWL, Vig PS, Shnorhokian H, Weyant R. The effectiveness of Class II division 1 treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthoped 1995;107: 329-324.
7. Vig KWL, Bennett ME, O'Brien KD, Vayda D, Vig P, Weyant RJ. Orthodontic treatment: outcome and effectiveness. In: Center for Human Growth and Development, Craniofacial Growth Series. Ann Arbor (MI): University of Michigan; 1995. p. 227-54.
8. Vig KW, Weyant R, Vayda D, O'Brien K, Bennett E. Orthodontic process and outcome: efficacy studies - strategies for developing process and outcome measures: a new era in orthodontics. Clin Orthod Res 1998;1:147-55.
9. Richmond S, Andrews M, Roberts CT. The provision of orthodontic care in the General Dental Services of England and Wales: extraction patterns, treatment duration, appliance types and standards. Br J Orthod 1993;20:345-50.
10. Kelly BM, Springate SD. Specialist orthodontics in the General Dental Service. Br Dent J 1996;180:209-15.
11. Beckwith FR, Ackerman RJ Jr, Cobb CM, Tira DE. An evaluation of factors affecting duration of orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthoped 1999;115: 439-17.
12. Kerr WJS, Buchanan IB, McNair FI, McColl JH. Factors influencing the outcome and duration of removable appliance treatment. Eur J Orthod 1994;16:181-6.
13. Kerr WJS, McColl JH, Frostick L. The use of removable orthodontic appliances in the General Dental Service. Br Dent J 1996;181:18-22.
14. Robb SI, Sadowsky C, Schneider BJ, BeGole EA. Effectiveness and duration of orthodontic treatment in adults and adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthoped 1998; 114:383-6.
15. Colella C, Izen J, McGrogan K, O'Brien K, Shnorhokian H, Vayda D, et al. Duration of treatment: Class I versus Class II malocclusions. J Dent Res (IADR Abstract 2098) 1994,73:364.
16. Wenger R, Douangpanya S, Vig K, Beck M, Vig P. Classes III and III differences in severity, duration and orthodontic results. J Dent Res (IADR Abstract 3355) 1996;75:437.
17. Vig K, O'Brien K, Shnorhokian H, Vayda D, Vig P, Weyant R, et al. Predictors for Class I and Class II treatment duration differ. J Dent Res (IADR Abstract 1372) 1994;73:273.
18. Vayda D, Korch S, Weyant R, Vig K, Vig P. Does patient age affect duration of success of orthodontic treatment? J Dent Res (AADR Abstract 1210) 1995,74:163.
19. Rinaldi A, Beck M, Vig K, Beglin F, Mayers M, Vig P. Increased orthodontic treatment efficiency over two decades. J Dent Res (IADR Abstract 3356) 1996,75:437.
20. Douangpanya S, Beck M, Wenger R, Vig K. Declining rates of orthodontic extractions: pre and post 1984 epochs. J Dent Res (IADR Abstract 3357) 1996;75:437.
21. Radnzic D. Effectiveness of Community Orthodontic Services in England and Wales [PhD Thesis]. Manchester: University of Manchester; 1999.
22. O'Brien KD, Weyant, RJ. Process analysis of treatment provided by the Hospital orthodontic service. Br J Orthod 1993;20:131-4.
23. Richmond S, Andrews M. Orthodontic treatment standards in Norway. Eur J Orthod 1993;15:7-15.
24. O'Brien KD, Shaw WC, Roberts CT. The use of occlusal indices in assessing the provision of orthodontic treatment by the Hospital orthodontic service of England and Wales. Br J Orthod 1993;20:25-35.
25. Richmond S, Shaw WC, Stephens CD, Webb WG, Roberts CT, Andrews M. Orthodontics in the General Dental Services of England and Wales: a critical assessment. Br Dent J 1993;174:315-29.
26. Fox NA. The first 100 cases: a personal audit of orthodontic treatment assessed by the PAR (Peer Assessment Rating) Index. Br Dent J 1993;174:290-7.
27. Turbill EA, Richmond S, Wright JL. A critical assessment of orthodontic standards in England and Wales (1990-1991) in relation to changes in prior approval. Br J Orthod 1996:23:221-8.
28. Turbill EA, Richmond S, Wright JL. A closer look at General Dental Service orthodontics in England and Wales I: Factors influencing effectiveness. Br Dent J 1999;187:211-6.
29. Richmond S, Shaw, WC, O'Brien, Buchanan IB, Jones R, Stephens CD, et al. The development of the PAR (Peer Assessment Rating) Index: Reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod 1992;14:125-39.
30. DeGuzman L, Bahiraei D, Vig KWL, Vig PS, Weyant RJ, O'Brien K. The validation of the Peer Assessment Rating index for malocclusion severity and treatment difficulty. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthoped 1995;107:173-6.
31. Townsend P, Davidson N, editors. Inequalities in health. The Black Report. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books Ltd; 1982.
32. Jenkins PM, Feldman BS, Stirrups D. The effect of social factors on referrals for orthodontic advice and treatment. Br J Orthod 1984;11:22-6.
33. Hinman C. Practice Management Forum. The Dental Practice Board Orthodontics - The current status. Br J Orthod 1995;22:287-90.
34. Richmond S, Shaw WC, Roberts CT, Andrews M. The PAR (Peer Assessment Rating) Index: Methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards. Eur J Orthod 1992;14:180-7.
35. Richmond S, Roberts CT, Andrews M. The use of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) in assessing the need for orthodontic treatment pre- and post-appliance therapy. Br J Orthod 1994;21:175-84.
36. The London Research Centre (UK). SASPAC: Small area and local bases statistics. London: The Research Centre; 1992.
37. SPSS Inc. Chicago (IL); 2000.
38. Steadman F St J. Orthodontics for the masses. Trans Br Soc Study Orthod 1925;129-53.
39. Rose JS. A thousand consecutive cases - a survey. Br J Orthod 1974;1:45-54.
40. Parkhouse, R. Orthodontics in the wake of Schanschieff. Br Dent J 1987;162:95-6.