The use of removable orthodontic appliances in the General Dental Service

British Dental Journal

Volumn 181, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 18-22

  Kerr, W J S ^a   McColl, J H ^b   Frostick, L ^b  

^a GLASGOW DENTAL HOSPITAL AND SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTITION; FEMALE; FORECASTING; GENERAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PATHOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED KINGDOM; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

CHILD; DENTITION, MIXED; FEMALE; FORECASTING; GENERAL PRACTICE, DENTAL; HUMANS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES, REMOVABLE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SCOTLAND; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0030572409     PISSN: 00070610     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809142     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Richmond S, Shaw W C, Stephens C D, Webb W G, Roberts C T, Andrews M. Orthodontics in the General Dental Service of England and Wales: a critical assessment. Br Dent J 1993; 174: 315-329.
2. Kerr W J S, Buchanan I B, McColl J H. Use of the PAR index in assessing the effectiveness of removable orthodontic appliances. Br J Orthod 1993; 20: 351-357.
3. Kerr W J S, Buchanan I B, McNair F I, McColl J H. Factors influencing the outcome and duration of removable appliance treatment. Eur J Orthod 1994; 16: 181-186.
4. Scottish Dental Practice Board Annual Report 1992/93. Edinburgh: Common Services Agency for the Scottish Health Service, 1993.
5. Banks P A, Corkhill C M, Bowden D E J, Morse P H, Shaw W C. The consultant orthodontic survey 1985 survey. Br Dent J 1988; 165: 425-429.
6. Richmond S, Shaw W C, O'Brien K D et al. The development of the PAR index (Peer Assessment Rating): reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod 1992; 14: 125-139.
7. Brook P H, Shaw W C. The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority. Eur J Orthod 1989; 11: 309-320.