Renormalization of pinned elastic systems: How does it work beyond one loop?

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 86, Issue 9, 2001, Pages 1785-1788

  Chauve, Pascal ^a   Le Doussal, Pierre ^b   Wiese, Kay Jörg ^c  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b ECOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTICITY; EQUATIONS OF MOTION; PHASE EQUILIBRIA; SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

FIELD THEORY; PINNED ELASTIC SYSTEM; RENORMALIZATION;

SOLID STATE PHYSICS;

EID: 0035243002     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1785     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. T. Nattermann, in Spin Glasses and Random Fields, edited by A. P. Young (World Scientific, Singapore, 1998).
2. T. Giamarchi and P. Le Doussal, Phys. Rev. B 52, 1242 (1995); cond-mat/9705096.
3. A. Prevost, Ph.D. thesis, Orsay University, 1999; E. Rolley (private communication).
4. A. Prevost, Ph.D. thesis, Orsay University, 1999; E. Rolley (private communication).
5. D. Ertas and M. Kardar, cond-mat/9401027.
6. For a review, see D. S. Fisher, cond-mat/9711179.
7. J. Schmittbuhl and K. J. Maloy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3888 (1997).
8. K. Efetov and A. Larkin, Sov. Phys. JETP 45, 1236 (1977).
9. D. S. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 1964 (1986).
10. M. Mézard and G. Parisi, J. Phys. I (France) 1, 809 (1991); L. Cugliandolo, J. Kurchan, and P. Le Doussal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2390 (1996).
11. M. Mézard and G. Parisi, J. Phys. I (France) 1, 809 (1991); L. Cugliandolo, J. Kurchan, and P. Le Doussal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2390 (1996).
12. L. Balents et al., J. Phys. I (Paris) 6, 1007 (1996).
13. T. Nattermann et al., J. Phys. (Paris) 2, 1483 (1992); H. Leschhorn et al., Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 6, 1 (1997).
14. T. Nattermann et al., J. Phys. (Paris) 2, 1483 (1992); H. Leschhorn et al., Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 6, 1 (1997).
15. O. Narayan and D. S. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B 46, 11 520 (1992); 48, 7030 (1993).
16. O. Narayan and D. S. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B 46, 11 520 (1992); 48, 7030 (1993).
17. P. Chauve, T. Giamarchi, and P. Le Doussal, Europhys. Lett. 44, 110 (1998); Phys. Rev. B 62, 6241 (2000).
18. P. Chauve, T. Giamarchi, and P. Le Doussal, Europhys. Lett. 44, 110 (1998); Phys. Rev. B 62, 6241 (2000).
19. c.
20. L. Balents and D. S. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B 48, 5949 (1993).
21. H. Leschhorn, Physica (Amsterdam) 195A, 324 (1993).
22. L. Roters et al., Phys. Rev. E 60, 5202 (1999).
23. U. Nowak and K. Usadel, Europhys. Lett. 44, 634 (1998).
24. P. B. Thomas and M. Paczuski, cond-mat/9602023.
25. P. Chauve, P. Le Doussal, and K. Wiese (to be published).
26. P. Chauve and P. Le Doussal, cond-mat/0006057; (to be published).
27. At equilibrium, time persistent, i.e., ∝ δ(ω) quantities identify (to all orders in perturbation) to distinct replica averages and equal time to same replica averages.
28. Noting [21] that graphs can be grouped in subsets (e.g., pairs ac, bd, ef in Fig. 2) which vanish by shifting the endpoint of an internal line within a splitted vertex.
29. 2 (we thank E. Brézin for this remark).
30. Anomalous contributions (e.g., ∝ ln2/∈) are found to cancel.
31. */(+∞) ≠ 0, as it should for RF.
32. The FP is however unstable in one direction.
33. Fractional powers of disorder then appear in equilibrium expectation values.
34. M. Paczuski et al., Phys. Rev. E 53, 414 (1996); O. Narayan, cond-mat/0008040.
35. A. A. Middleton, Phys. Rev. E 52, R3337 (1995).