Informal leaders and the development of group efficacy

Small Group Research

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 74-93

  Pescosolido, Anthony T ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035242049     PISSN: 10464964     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/104649640103200104     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2. Bandura, A. A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84.
3. Bandura, A. A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4. Bandura, A. A. (1995). Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies. Self-efficacy in changing societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. Bandura, A. A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
6. Bass, B. M. (1990). The Bass & Stogdill handbook of leadership (3rd. ed). New York: Free Press.
7. Beekun, R. I. (1989). Assessing the effectiveness of sociotechnical interventions: Antidote or fad? Human Relations, 42, 877-897.
8. Cohen, S. G., Ledford, G. E., Jr., & Spreitzer, G. M. (1996). A predictive model of self-managing work team effectiveness. Human Relations, 49, 643-676.
9. De Souza, G., & Klein, H. (1995). Emergent leadership in the group goal-setting process. Small Group Research, 26, 475-495.
10. Druskat, V., & Kayes, D. C. (1999). The antecedents of team competence: Toward a fine-grained model of self-managing team effectiveness. In Neale & Mannix (Series Eds.) & R. Wageman (Vol. Ed.), Research on managing groups and teams (Vol. 2, pp. 201-231). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
11. Druskat, V., & Pescosolido, A. (1999). Leading self-managing work teams from the inside: Informal leader behaviors and team outcomes. Manuscript submitted for publication.
12. Durham, C. C., Knight, D., & Locke, E. A. (1997). Effects of leader role, team-set goal difficulty, efficacy, and tactics on team effectiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72, 203-231.
13. Gersick, C. G. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9-41.
14. Gersick, C. G. (1989). Marking time: Predictable transitions in task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 274-309.
15. Gibson, C.B. (1999). Do they do what they believe they can? Group efficacy and group performance across tasks and cultures. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 138-152.
16. Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17, 183-211.
17. Goodman, P. S. (1982). The Rushton quality of work life experiment: Lessons to be learned. In R. Zager & M. P. Rosow (Eds.), The innovative organization: Productivity programs in action (pp. 222-259). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
18. Guzzo, R. A., Yost, P. R., Campbell, R. J., & Shea, G. P. (1993). Potency in groups: Articulating a construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 87-106.
19. Hollander, E. P. (1961). Emergent leadership and social influence. In L. Petrullo & B. Bass (Eds.), Leadership and interpersonal behavior (pp. 30-47). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
20. Hollander, E. P. (1985). Leadership and power. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 485-538). New York: Random House.
21. Kolodny, H. F., & Kiggundu, M. N. (1980). Towards the development of a sociotechnical systems model in woodlands mechanical harvesting. Human Relations, 33, 623-645.
22. James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98.
23. Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P., Jr. (1984). Searching for the "unleader": Organizational member views on leading self-managed groups. Human Relations, 37, 409-424.
24. Pescosolido, A. T. (1999). Group efficacy and overall group effectiveness. Manuscript submitted for publication.
25. Peterson, E., Mitchell, T., Thompson, L., & Burr, R. (1996, August). Group efficacy and shared cognition as predictors of group process and performance. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meetings, Cincinnati, OH.
26. Schneier, C. E., & Goktepe, J. R. (1983). Issues in emergent leadership: The contingency model of leadership, leader sex, and leader behavior. In Blumber, Hare, Kent, & Davies (Eds.), Small groups and social interaction (Vol. 1). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
27. Seligman, M. (1990). Learned optimism. New York: Simon & Schuster.
28. Silver, W. S., & Bufiano, K. M. (1996). The impact of group efficacy and group goals on group task performance. Small Group Research, 27, 55-72.
29. Smircich, L., & Morgan, G. (1982). Leadership: The management of meaning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 18, 257-273.
30. Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. San Diego: Academic Press.
31. Stoner, J.A.F. (1968). Risky and cautious shifts in group decisions: The influence of widely held values. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4.
32. Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-399.
33. Wall, T. D., Kemp, N. J., Jackson, P. R., & Clegg, C. W. (1986). Outcomes of autonomous work groups: A long-term field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 280-304.
34. Walton, R. E. (1982). The Topeka work system: Optimistic visions, pessimistic hypotheses, and reality. In R. Zager & M. P. Rosow (Eds.), The innovative organization: Productivity programs in action (pp. 260-287). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
35. Wheelan, S. A., & Johnston, F. (1996). The role of informal member leaders in a system containing formal leaders. Small Group Research, 27, 33-55.
36. Yammarino, F. J. (1996). Group leadership: A levels of analysis perspective. In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology (pp. 189-224). New York: John Wiley.
37. Zander, A., & Medow, H. (1964). Group aspirations and group coping behavior. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.