What does the Ternus display tell us about motion processing in human vision?

Perception

Volumn 30, Issue 10, 2001, Pages 1179-1188

  Scott Samuel, Nicholas E ^a,b   Hess, Robert F ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMAN; MOTION PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SPACE PERCEPTION; SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T;

EID: 0035238650     PISSN: 03010066     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1068/p3247     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Adelson E H, Bergen J R, 1985 "Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion" Journal of the Optical Society of America A 2 284-299
2. Anstis S, 1980 "The perception of apparent movement" Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 290 153-168
3. Badcock D R, Hutchison H, 1998 "Orientation dependent interactions between first-and second-order texture properties" Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 39(4) 858
4. Braddick O J, 1974 "A short-range process in apparent motion" Vision Research 14 519-527
5. Braddick O J, 1980 "Low-level and high-level processes in apparent motion" Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 290 137-151
6. Braddick O J, Adlard A, 1978 "Apparent motion and the motion detector", in Visual Psychophysics and Physiology Eds J Armington, J Krauskopf, B R Wooten (New York: Academic Press) pp 417-426
7. Cestnick L, Coltheart M, 1999 "The relationship between language-processing and visual-processing deficits in developmental dyslexia" Cognition 71 231-255
8. Dakin S C, Williams C B, Hess R F, 1999 "The interaction of first-and second-order cues to orientation" Vision Research 39 2867-2884
9. Georgeson M A, Harris M G, 1990 "The temporal range of motion sensing and motion perception" Vision Research 30 615-619
10. Georgeson M A, Shackleton T M, 1989 "Monocular motion sensing, binocular motion perception" Vision Research 29 1511-1523
11. Hammett S T, Ledgeway T, Smith A T, 1993 "Transparent motion from feature-and luminance-based processes" Vision Research 33 1119-1122
12. Levinson E, Sekuler R, 1975 "The independence of channels in human vision selective for direction of movement" Journal of Physiology 250 347-366
13. Lu Z, Sperling G, 1995 "The functional architecture of human visual motion perception" Vision Research 35 2697-2722
14. Pantle A, Picciano L, 1976 "A multistable movement display: evidence for two separate motion systems in human vision" Science 193 500-502
15. Petersik J T, 1989 "The two-process distinction in apparent motion" Psychological Bulletin 106 107-127
16. Petersik J T, Hicks K I, Pantle A J, 1978 "Apparent movement of successively generated subjective figures" Perception 7 371-383
17. Petersik J T, Pantle A J, 1979 "Factors controlling the competing sensations produced by a bistable stroboscopic motion display" Vision Research 19 143-154
18. Regan D, Bartol S, Murray T J, Beverley K I, 1982 "Spatial frequency discrimination in normal vision and in patients with multiple sclerosis" Brain 105 735-754
19. Regan D, Beverley K I, 1985 "Postadaptation orientation discrimination" Journal of the Optical Society of America A 2 147-155
20. Scott-Samuel N E, Georgeson M A, 1999 "Feature matching and segmentation in motion perception" Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 266 2289-2294
21. Slaghuis W, Twell A, Kingston K, 1996 "Visual and language processing deficits are concurrent in dyslexia and continue into adulthood" Cortex 32 413-438
22. Ternus J, 1926 "The problem of phenomenal identity", in A Sourcebook of Gestalt Psychology Ed.W D Ellis (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul) pp 149-160