Partial-coverage posterior ceramic restorations. Part 2: Operative innovations

Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry: official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry … [et al.]

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 304-317

  Liebenberg, William H ^a  

^a Private General Dental Practitioner   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLITEF;

ARTICLE; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; PREMOLAR TOOTH; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

BICUSPID; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL RESTORATION, TEMPORARY; HUMANS; INLAYS; MATRIX BANDS; MOLAR; POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE; RUBBER DAMS;

EID: 0035236942     PISSN: 14964155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2001.tb01013.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. 1 Liebenberg WH. Partial‐coverage posterior ceramic restorations. Part 1: a return to diligence. J Esthet Restor Dent 2001 ; 13: 296–303.
2. 2 Bergmann P, Noack MJ, Roulet JF. Marginal adaptation with glass‐ceramic inlays adhesively luted with glycerine gel. Quintessence Int 1991 ; 22: 739–744.
3. 3 Denissen H, Dozic A, Van Der Zel J, Van Waas M. Marginal fit and short‐term clinical performance of porcelain‐veneered CICERO, CEREC, and Procera onlays. J Prosthet Dent 2000 ; 84: 506–513.
4. 4 Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Vichi A, Goracci G. Bond strengths of a porcelain material to different abutment substrates. Oper Dent 2000 ; 25: 299–305.
5. 5 Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Innocenti M, Kugel G, Davidson CL. Clinical evaluation of Dyract AP and Fuji IX to build up abutments for porcelain crowns. J Dent Res 1998 ; 77: 956.(Abstr).
6. 6 Etemadi S, Smales RJ, Drummond PW, Goodhart JR. Assessment of tooth preparation designs for posterior resin‐bonded porcelain restorations. J Oral Rehabil 1999 ; 26: 691–697.
7. 7 Liebenberg WH, Wauchope F. Depth cutting bur facilitating precise prosthodontic preparations: a pictorial essay of applications using the Calibur. Can J Dent Technol 1998 ; 2: 44–50.
8. 8 Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Vichi A, Mannocci F, Mason PN, Mjör IA. Bonding of all‐porcelain crowns: structural characteristics of the substrate. Dent Mater 2001 ; 17: 156–164.
9. 9 Kramer N, Frankenberger R, Pelka M, Petschelt A. IPS Empress inlays and onlays after four years: a clinical study. J Dent 1999 ; 27: 325–331.
10. 10 Ottl P, Piwowarczyk A, Lauer HC, Hegenbarth EA. The Procera AHCeram system. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000 ; 20: 151–161.
11. 11 Liebenberg WH. Secondary retention of rubber dam: effective moisture control access considerations. Quintessence Int 1995 ; 26: 243–252.
12. 12 Bertschinger C, Paul SJ, Luthy H, Scharer P. Dual application of dentin bonding agents: effect on bond strength. Am J Dent 1996 ; 9: 115–119.
13. 13 Cobb DS, Reinhardt JW, Vargas MA. Effect of HEMA‐containing dentin desen‐sitizers on shear bond strength of a resin cement. Am J Dent 1997 ; 10: 62–65.
14. 14 Paul SJ, Scharer P. The dual bonding technique: a modified method to improve adhesive luting procedures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1997 ; 17: 536–545.
15. 15 Dorfer CE, Staehle HJ, Wurst MW, Duschner H, Pioch T. The nanoleakage phenomenon: influence of different dentin bonding agents, thermocycling, and etching time. Eur J Oral Sci 2000 ; 108: 346–351.
16. 16 Olio G, Jorgensen KD. The influence of surface roughness in the retentive ability of two dental luting cements. J Oral Rehabil 1978 ; 5: 377–389.
17. 17 Zena RB, Khan Z, Von Fraunhofer JA. Shoulder preparations for collarless ceramic crowns: hand‐planing as opposed to rotary instrumentation. J Prosthet Dent 1989 ; 62: 273–277.
18. 18 Liebenberg WH. Reducing marginal flash in the fabrication of direct provisional restorations: a new technique using light‐cured resin and transparent silicone. J Can Dent Assoc 1995 ; 61: 708–713.
19. 19 Liebenberg WH. Variables which affect the marginal accuracy of the resin bonded posterior ceramic restoration: a pictorial essay. J Dent Assoc South Afr 1993 ; 48: 469–473.
20. 20 Liebenberg WH. Partial‐coverage indirect tooth‐colored restorations: steps to clinical success. Am J Dent 1999 ; 12: 201–208.
21. 21 Liebenberg WH, Crawford BJ. Subcutaneous, orbital and mediastinal emphysema secondary to the use of an air‐abrasive device. Quintessence Int 1997 ; 28: 31–38.
22. 22 Liebenberg WH. Tinted luting resin for partial‐coverage restorations: a case report of a new provisionalization technique. Quintessence Int 1996 ; 27: 793–801.
23. 23 Terata R, Yoshinaka S, Nakashima K, Kubota M. Effect of resinous temporary material on tensile bond strength of resin luting cement to tooth substrate. Dent Mater J 1996 ; 15: 45–50.
24. 24 Terata R, Nakashima K, Kubota M. Effect of temporary materials on bond strength of resin‐modified glass‐ionomer luting cement to teeth. Am J Dent 2000 ; 13: 209–211.
25. 25 Liebenberg WH. Interproximal integrity of posterior partial‐coverage ceramic restorations: sequence of delivery and finishing. Quintessence Int 1999 ; 30: 807–818.
26. 26 Gemalmaz D, Ozcan M, Yoruc AB, Alkumru HN. Marginal adaptation of a sintered ceramic inlay system before and after cementation. J Oral Rehabil 1997 ; 24: 646–651.
27. 27 Tay WM, Lynch E, Auger D. Effects of some finishing techniques on cervical margins of porcelain laminates. Quintessence Int 1987 ; 18: 599–602.
28. 28 Frankenberger R, Petschelt A, Kramer N. Leucite‐reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: clinical behavior. Oper Dent 2000 ; 25: 459–465.
29. 29 Kramer N, Frankenberger R. Leucite‐reinforced glass ceramic inlays after six years: wear of luting composites. Oper Dent 2000 ; 25: 466–472.