Partial coverage indirect tooth-colored restorations: Steps to clinical success

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 201-209

  Liebenberg, William H ^a  

^a NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; DEVICE REMOVAL; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; TOOTH FRACTURE;

CRACKED TOOTH SYNDROME; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, TEMPORARY; DEVICE REMOVAL; HUMANS; INLAYS;

EID: 0033169923     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Ott Klaus HR. Criteria for the selection of a restorative. In: WH Mormann. CAD/CIM in aesthetic dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence, 1996; 195-198.
2. Wagenberg BD. Exposing adequate tooth structure for restorative dentistry. Int J Periodont Res Dent 1989; 9:323-329.
3. Ehrmann EH, Tyas MJ. Cracked tooth syndrome; Diagnosis, treatment and correlation with post-extraction findings. Aust Dent J 1990;35:105-112.
4. Sabiston CB. Etiology of cracked teeth: A review and proposal. Iowa Dent J 1994;80;4:13-14.
5. Geursten W. The cracked-tooth syndrome: Clinical features and case reports. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1992;12:395-405.
6. Simonsen RJ. Why crowns? (Editorial). Quint Int 1995; 26:1.
7. Pameijer CH, Grossman D, Adair PJ. Physical properties of a castable ceramic dental restorative material. J Dent Res 1980;59:474 (Abstr 827).
8. Derand T. Stress analysis of cemented or resin bonded loaded porcelain inlays. Dent Mater 1991;7:21-24.
9. Lopes LMP, Leitao JGM, Douglas WH. Effect of a new inlay/onlay restorative material on cuspal reinforcement. Quint Int 1991; 22:641-645.
10. Malcolm PJ, Hood JAA. The effect of cast restorations in reducing cusp flexibility in restored teeth. J Dent Res 1977;56: D207 (Abstr 67).
11. Adair PJ, Grossman DG. Esthetic properties of lost tooth structure compared with ceramic restorations. J Dent Res 1982;61:291 (Abstr 1025).
12. Christensen GJ. A look at the state-of the-art tooth-colored inlays and onlays. J Am Dent Assoc 1992;123:66-70.
13. Jackson RD. Aesthetic and economic incentives for inlay and onlay restorations. Pract Perio Aesth Dent 1992;4:18-19.
14. Banks RG. Conservative posterior ceramic restorations: A literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:619-626.
15. Liebenberg WH. Partial coverage and the incompletely cracked tooth: Steps to success using resin bonded ceramic restorations. J Esthet Dent 1995;7:155-166.
16. Liebenberg WH. Treating incomplete fractures in posterior teeth with resin bonded partial coverage ceramic restorations: A clinical report. Quint Int 1996;27:739-747.
17. Vale WA. Cavity preparation. Irish Dent Rev 1956;2: 33-41.
18. Osborne JW, Summitt JB. Extension for prevention: Is it relevant today? Am J Dent 1998;11:189-196.
19. Broderson SP. Complete-crown and partial-coverage tooth preparation designs for bonded cast ceramic restorations. Quint Int 1994;25:535-539.
20. Jackson RD, Ferguson RW. An esthetic, bonded inlay-onlay technique for posterior teeth. Quint Int 1990;21:7-12.
21. Douglas WH. Methods to improve fracture resistance of teeth. In: Vanherle G, Smith C. Posterior composite resin dental restorative materials. St. Paul: 3M Co., 1985.
22. Simonsen RJ, Barouch E, Gelb M. Cusp fracture resistance from composite resin in Class II restorations. J Dent Res 1983;62:254 (Abstr 761).
23. Morin D, Delong R, Douglas WH. Cusp reinforcement by the acid-etch technique. J Dent Res 1984;63:1075-1078.
24. Hood JA. Methods to improve fracture resistance of teeth. In: Vanherle G, Smith C. Posterior composite resin dental restorative materials. St. Paul; 3M Co., 1985.
25. Redford DA, Jensen ME. Etched porcelain resin bonded posterior restorations. Cuspal flexure, strength, microleakage. J Dent Res 1986;65: 344 (Abstr 1573).
26. Dietschi D, Magne P, Holz J. An in vitro study of parameters related to marginal and internal seal of bonded restorations. Quint Int 1993;24:281-291.
27. Abbate MF, Tjan AHL, Fox WM. Comparison of the marginal fit of various ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:527-531.
28. Belser UC, MacEntree MI, Richter WA. Fit of three porcelain-fused-to-metal marginal designs in vivo: A scanning electron microscope study. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:24-29.
29. Gavelis JR, Morency JD, Riley ED, et al. The effect of various finish line preparations on the marginal seal and occlusal seat of full crown preparations. J Prosthet Dent 1981;45:138-145.
30. Gardener FM. Margins of complete crowns. Literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:396-399.
31. Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Fisher DW. Preparation design and margin distortion in porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1973; 29:276-284.
32. Hembree JH, George TA, Hembree ME. Film thickness of cements beneath complete crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1978;39:533-535.
33. Mitchem JC, Gronas DG. Continued evaluation of the clinical solubility of luting cements. J Prosthet Dent 1981;45:289-291.
34. Christensen GJ. Marginal fit of gold inlay castings. J Prosthet Dent 1966;16:297-305.
35. McLean JW, Von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971;131:107-111.
36. Christensen GJ, Brown TA, Babb R. Accuracy of fit of direct-firing porcelain inlays. J Prosthet Dent 1969;22:46-52.
37. Liebenberg WH. Variables which affect the marginal accuracy of the resin bonded posterior ceramic restoration: A pictorial essay. J Dent Assoc S Afr 1993;8:469-473.
38. Liebenberg WH. Achieving interdental integrity in resin-bonded posterior ceramic restorations. Pract Perio Aesth Dent 1994; 6:43-51.
39. Bergmann P, Noack MJ, Roulet JF. Marginal adaptation with glass-ceramic inlays adhesively luted with glycerine gel. Quint Int 1991;22:739-744.
40. Barrack G. Aesthetical partial coverage dental restorations. Cur Opin Dent 1992;2:39-44.
41. Garber DA, Goldstein RE. Etched porcelain inlays and onlays. Quintessence: Chicago; 1993.
42. Roulet JF, Herder S. Bonded ceramic inlays. Quintessence: Chicago; 1991.
43. Dietchi D, Spreafico R. Adhesive metal-free restorations. Current concepts for the esthetic treatment of posterior teeth. Quintessence: Chicago; 1997.
44. Cox CF. Biocompatability of dental materials in absence of bacterial infection. Oper Dent 1987;12:146-152.
45. Cox C, Keall C, Keall H, et al. Biocompatibility of surface-sealed dental materials against exposed pulps. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:1-8.
46. Cox CF. Biocompatibility of dental materials in the absence of bacterial infection. Oper Dent 1987;12:146-152.
47. Bergenholtz G. Bacterial leakage around dental restorations-Impact on the pulp. In: Anusavice KJ. Proceedings of the international symposium on criteria for placement and replacement of dental restorations. Chicago: Quintessence, 1989;243-251.
48. Barkmeier WW, Shaffer SE, Gwinnett AJ. Retentive and morphological characteristics of enamel following 15 and 60 second acid conditioning. Oper Dent 1986;11:111-116.
49. Gwinnett AJ. Effect of cavity disinfection on bond strength to dentin. J Esthet Dent 1992;4 (Suppl):11-13.
50. Oilo G, Jorgensen KD. The influence of surface roughness in the retentive ability of two dental luting cements. J Oral Rehabil 1978;5: 377-389.
51. Zena RB, Khan Z, Von Fraunhofer JA. Shoulder preparations for collarless ceramic crowns: Hand-planing as oppossed to rotary instrumentation. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:273-277.
52. Shillingburg HT, Jacobi R, Brackett SE. Fundamentals of tooth preparations. Chicago:Quintessence, 1987;270.
53. Liebenberg WH. Reducing marginal flash in the fabrication of direct provisional restorations: A new technique utilizing LC resin and transparent silicone. J Can Dent Assoc 1995;61:708-713.
54. Jensen ME, Redford PA, Williams BT, et al. Posterior etched-porcelain restorations: An in vitro study. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1987;8:615-622.
55. Talegani M, Leinfelder KF, Lane J. Posterior porcelain bonded inlays. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1986;12:1-2.
56. Liebenberg WH. Variables which affect the marginal accuracy of the resin bonded posterior ceramic restoration: A pictorial essay. J Dent Assoc S Afr 1993;48: 469-473.
57. Barghi N, Simmonds EW. The marginal integrity of the temporary acrylic resin crown. J Prosthet Dent 1976;36:274-277.
58. Silness J. Periodontal condition in patients treated with dental bridges.III. The relationship between the location of the crown margin and the periodontal condition. J Periodont Res 1970;5:225-229.
59. Nevins M. Interproximal periodontal disease. The embrasure as an etiologic factor. Int J Perio Rest Dent 1982;6:9-27.
60. Liebenberg WH. Improving interproximal access in direct temporary acrylic resin restorations. Quint Int 1994;25:697-703.
61. Liebenberg WH, Crawford BJ. Subcutaneous, orbital and mediastinal emphysema secondary to the use of an air-abrasive device. Quint Int 1997; 28:31-38.
62. Liebenberg WH. Tinted luting resin for partial-coverage restorations: A case report of a new provisionalization technique. Quint Int 1996;27: 793-801.
63. Dickinson GL, Leinfelder KF. Assessing the long-term effect of a surface penetrating sealant. J Am Dent Assoc 1993;124:68-72.
64. Dickinson GL, Leinfelder KF, Mazer RB, et al. Effect of surface penetrating sealant on wear rates of posterior composite resins. J Am Dent Assoc 1990;121:251-255.