Relations among equivalence, naming, and conflicting baseline control

Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

Volumn 75, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 55-76

  Carr, Deborah ^a   Blackman, D E ^b  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Computer; Equivalence; Humans; Naming; Stimulus control

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; COMPUTER; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

ADULT; BEHAVIOR; COMPUTERS; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMANS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 0035227926     PISSN: 00225002     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-55     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Barnes, D. (1996). Naming as a technical term: Sacrificing behavior analysis at the altar of popularity? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 264-267.
2. Carrigan, P. F., & Sidman, M. (1992). Conditional discrimination and equivalence relations: A theoretical analysis of control by negative stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 58, 183-204.
3. D'Amato, M. R., Salmon, D. P., Loukas, E., & Tomie, A. (1985). Processing of identity and equivalence relations in monkeys (Cebus apella) and pigeons (Columba livia). Animal learning & Behavior, 44, 365-373.
4. Devaney, J. M., Hayes, S. C., & Nelson, R. O. (1986). Equivalence class formation in language-able and language-disabled children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 243-257.
5. Eikeseth, S., & Smith, T. (1992). The development of functional and equivalence classes in high-functioning autistic children: The role of naming. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 58, 123-133.
6. Hayes, S. C. (1994). Relational frame theory: A functional approach to verbal events. In S. C. Hayes & L. J. Hayes (Eds.), Behavior analysis of language and cognition (pp. 9-29). Reno, NV: Context Press.
7. Hayes, S. C. (1996). Developing a theory of derived stimulus relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 309-311.
8. Hayes, S. C., & Hayes, L. J. (1992). Verbal relations, cognition and the evolution of behavior. American Psychologist, 47, 1383-1395.
9. Horne, P. J., & Lowe, C. F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 185-241.
10. Johnson, C., & Sidman, M. (1993). Conditional discrimination and equivalence relations: Control by negative stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 333-347.
11. Lazar, R. (1977). Extending sequence class membership with matching to sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 27, 381-392.
12. Lipkens, R., Kop, P. F. M., & Matthijs, W. (1988). A test of symmetry and transitivity in the conditional discrimination performances of pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 395-409.
13. Lowe, C. F., & Beasty, A. (1987). Language and the emergence of equivalence relations: A developmental study. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 40, A42.
14. Pilgrim, C., Chambers, L., & Galizio, M. (1995). Reversal of baseline relations and stimulus equivalence: II. Children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 63, 239-254.
15. Pilgrim, C., & Galizio, M. (1990). Relations between baseline contingencies and equivalence probe performances. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 213-224.
16. Pilgrim, C., & Galizio, M. (1995). Reversal of baseline relations and stimulus equivalence: I. Adults. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 63, 225-238.
17. Roche, B., Barnes, D., & Smeets, P. M. (1997). Incongruous stimulus pairing and conditional discrimination training: Effects on relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 143-160.
18. Saunders, R. R., Drake, K. M., & Spradlin, J. E. (1999). Equivalence class establishment, expansion, and modification in preschool children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 71, 195-214.
19. Saunders, R. R., Saunders, K. J., Kirby, K. C., & Spradlin, J. E. (1988). The merger and development of equivalence classes by unreinforced conditional selection of comparison stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 145-162.
20. Sidman, M. (1990). Equivalence relations: Where do they come from? In D. E. Blackman & H. Lejeune (Eds.), Behavior analysis in theory and practice: Contributions and controversies (pp. 93-114). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.
22. Sidman, M., & Cresson, O. (1973). Reading and cross-modal transfer of stimulus equivalences in severe retardation. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 77, 515-523.
23. Sidman, M., Kirk, B., & Willson-Morris, M. (1985). Six-member stimulus classes generated by conditional-discrimination procedures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 43, 21-42.
24. Sidman, M., Rauzin, R., Lazar, R., Cunningham, S., Tailby, W., & Carrigan, P. (1982). A search for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of rhesus monkeys, baboons and children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 23-44.
25. Sidman, M., & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5-22.
26. Spradlin, J. E., & Saunders, R. R. (1986). The development of stimulus classes using match-to-sample procedures: Sample classification versus comparison classification. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 6, 41-58.
27. Stikeleather, G., & Sidman, M. (1990). An instance of spurious equivalence relations. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 8, 1-11.
28. Stoddard, L. T., & McIlvane, W. J. (1986). Stimulus control research and developmentally disabled individuals. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 6, 155-178.
29. Wilson, K., & Hayes, S. C. (1996). Resurgence of derived stimulus relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 161-175.