Learning productivity at research universities

Journal of Higher Education

Volumn 72, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 1-28

  Kuh, George D ^a   Hu, Shouping ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035218276     PISSN: 00221546     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2001.11778862     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Alpert, D. (1985). Performance and paralysis: The organizational context of the American research university. Journal of Higher Education, 56, 241-281.
2. Astin, A. W., (1985). Achieving educational excellence. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college: Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Astin, A. W. (1997). The changing American college student: Thirty year trends, 1966-1996. Review of Higher Education, 21, 115-135.
5. Baird, L. L. (1976). Using self-reports to predict student performance. New York: The College Board.
6. Baird, L. L. (1988). The college environment revisited: A review of research and theory. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 4, pp. 1-52). New York: Agathon.
7. Barron's Profiles of American Colleges (1996). Hauppage, NY: Barron's Educational Series.
8. Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America's research universities. Stony Brook, NY: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
9. Braxton, J. M. (1993). Selectivity and rigor in research universities. Journal of Higher Education, 64, 657-675.
10. Brooks, H. (1994). Current criticisms of research universities. In J. R. Cole, E. G. Barber, & S. R. Graubard (Eds.), The research university in a time of discontent (pp. 231-254). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
11. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (1994). A classification of institutions of higher education. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
12. Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39(7), 3-7.
13. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Rev. ed.). New York: Academic Press.
14. Dey, E. L., Milem, J. F., & Berger, J. B. (1997). Changing patterns of publication productivity: Accumulative advantage or institutional isomorphism? Sociology of Education, 70, 308-323.
15. Diamond, R. M., & Adam, B. E. (1997). Changing priorities at research universities: 1991-1996. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Center for Instructional Development.
16. Education Commission of the States (1995). Making quality count in undergraduate education. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
17. Ewell, P. T., & Jones, D. P. (1996). Indicators of "goodpractice" in undergraduate education: A handbook for development and implementation. Boulder, CO: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems.
18. Geiger, R. L. (1986). To advance knowledge: The growth of the American research universities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Geiger, R. L. (1993). Research and relevant knowledge: American research universities since World War II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Graham, H. D., & Diamond, N. (1997). The rise of American research universities: Elites and challengers in the postwar era. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
21. Guskin, A. E. (1994). Reducing student costs and enhancing student learning: The university challenge of the 1990s. Change, 26(4), 23-29.
22. Hansen, E. J. (1998). Essential demographics of today's college students. AAHE Bulletin, 51(3), 3-5.
23. Johnstone, D. B. (1993). Enhancing the productivity of learning. AAHE Bulletin, 46(4), 4-8.
24. Kellogg Commission on the Future of State and Land-Grant Universities. (1997). Returning to our roots: The student experience. Washington, DC: National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges.
25. Klecka, W. R. (1980). Discriminant analysis. Beverly Hills, Ca.: Sage.
26. Kuh, G. D. (1999). How are we doing? Tracking the quality of the undergraduate experience from the 1960s to the present. Review of Higher Education, 22, 99-119.
27. Kuh, G. D., Hu, S., & Vesper, N. (2000). "They shall be known by what they do": An activities-based typology of college students. Journal of College Student Development, 41, 228-244.
28. Kuh, G. D., Schuh, J. H., Whitt, E. J., & Associates. (1991). Involving colleges: Successful approaches to fostering student learning and development outside the classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29. Kuh, G. D., & Vesper, N. (1997). A comparison of student experiences with good practices in undergraduate education between 1990 and 1994. Review of Higher Education, 21, 43-61.
30. Kuh, G. D., Vesper, N., Connolly, M. R., Pace, C. R. (1997). College Student Experiences Questionnaire: Revised norms for the third edition. Bloomington, IN: Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning, School of Education, Indiana University.
31. Kuh, G. D., Vesper, N., & Krehbiel, L. (1994). Student learning at metropolitan universities. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 9). New York: Agathon.
32. Kuh, G. D., Vesper, N., & Pace, C. R. (1997). The development of process indicators to estimate student gains associated with good practices in undergraduate education. Research in Higher Education, 38, 435-454.
33. Lipset, S. M. (1994). In defense of the research university. In J. R. Cole, E. G. Barber, & S. R. Graubard (Eds.), The research university in a time of discontent (pp. 219-224). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
34. Marchese, T. (1998, May/June). Disengaged students II. Change, 4.
35. Noll, R. G. (1998). Challenges to research universities. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
36. Pace, C. R. (1984). Measuring the quality of college student experiences. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles, Center for the Study of Evaluation.
37. Pace, C. R. (1987). CSEQ: Test manual and norms: College student experiences questionnaire. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles, Center for the Study of Evaluation.
38. Pace, C. R. (1990a). College student experiences questionnaire, Third Edition. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles, Center for the Study of Evaluation. (Available from the Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning, Indiana University).
39. rd ed.). Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles, Center for the Study of Evaluation.
40. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
41. Rosovsky, H. (1990). The university: An owner's manual. New York: Norton.
42. Sacks, P. (1996). Generation X goes to college: An eye-opening account of teaching in postmodern America. Chicago: Open Court.
43. SPSS Inc. (1999). SPSS Base 9.0 application guide. Author.
44. Tacq, J. J. A. (1997). Multivariate analysis techniques in social science research: From problem to analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
45. Vincow, G. (1997). The student-centered research university. Innovative Higher Education, 21, 165-178.
46. Wingspread Group on Higher Education. (1993). An American imperative: Higher expectations for higher education. Racine, WI: Johnson Foundation.