|
Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 101-105
|
Postcoital contraception
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
COPPER INTRAUTERINE DEVICE;
ESTROGEN;
LEVONORGESTREL;
MIFEPRISTONE;
ORAL CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT;
POSTCOITUS CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT;
BIRTH CONTROL;
COITUS;
CONTRACEPTION;
DRUG INDICATION;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE;
PATIENT EDUCATION;
REVIEW;
ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL;
ATTITUDE TO HEALTH;
CONTRACEPTIVES, POSTCOITAL;
DANAZOL;
FEMALE;
HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE;
HEALTH PERSONNEL;
HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY;
HUMANS;
INTRAUTERINE DEVICES, COPPER;
MIFEPRISTONE;
NEEDS ASSESSMENT;
PATIENT EDUCATION;
TIME FACTORS;
UNITED STATES;
UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION;
|
EID: 0035130788
PISSN: 00099201
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1097/00003081-200103000-00013 Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (3)
|
References (15)
|