Changing patterns of sedation use for routine out-patient diagnostic gastroscopy between 1989 and 1998

Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 217-220

  Mulcahy, H E ^a,b   Hennessy, E ^a   Connor, P ^a   Rhodes, B ^a   Patchett, S E ^a   Farthing, M J G ^a   Fairclough, P D ^a  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b KING S COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ENDOSCOPE; FEMALE; GASTROSCOPY; HUMAN; MALE; OUTPATIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOVERY ROOM; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SEDATION; SEX DIFFERENCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AMBULATORY CARE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; DIAGNOSTIC EQUIPMENT; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES; FEMALE; GASTROSCOPY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 0035129103     PISSN: 02692813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2001.00912.x     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Prospective audit of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in two regions of England: Safety, staffing, and sedation methods
2. Preparation, premedication and surveillance
3. Survey of endoscopic sedation and monitoring practices
4. Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: Results of a nationwide survey
5. Struggling toward easier endoscopy
6. Conscious sedation for gastroscopy: Patient tolerance and cardiorespiratory parameters
7. Results from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy/U.S. Food and Drug Administration collaborative study on complication rates and drug use during gastrointestinal endoscopy
8. Endoscopic perforation in unsedated patients undergoing endoscopy
9. Patient attitudes to sedation for diagnostic upper endoscopy