Reliability of elasticity analysis: Reply to mills et al.

Conservation Biology

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 278-280

  Ehrlén, Johan ^a   Van Groenendael, Jan ^b   De Kroon, Hans ^b,c  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^c WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035126941     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.99529.x     Document Type: Note

References (15)

1. Elasticity analysis as an important tool in evolutionary and population ecology
2. Population growth with stochastic fluctuations in the life table
3. Matrix methods for population analysis
4. Prospective and retrospective perturbation analyses: Their roles in conservation biology
5. Elasticities: A review of methods and model limitations
6. Modelling and measuring plant life histories
7. Direct perturbation analysis for better conservation
8. Application of life-history theory and population model analysis to turtle conservation
9. Life histories and elasticity patterns: Perturbation analysis for species with minimal demographic data
10. The relative "importance" of life-history stages to population growth: Prospective and retrospective analyses
11. Reliability of conservation actions based on elasticity analysis of matrix models
12. Patterns of variance in stage-structured populations: Evolutionary predictions and ecological implications
13. Life-history variation and contribution of different demographic traits to the population growth rate in birds: A comparative approach
14. Life cycle trade-offs in matrix population models
15. Sensitivity analysis to guide population recovery: Prairie-chickens as an example