Duality in the Azbel-Hofstadter problem and two-dimensional d-wave superconductivity with a magnetic field

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 86, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 151-154

  Morita, Y ^a   Hatsugai, Y ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRYSTAL LATTICES; FERMIONS; HAMILTONIANS; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; QUANTUM THEORY; TOPOLOGY; TWO DIMENSIONAL;

AZBEL-HOFSTADTER PROBLEM; QUASIPARTICLE;

SUPERCONDUCTIVITY;

EID: 0035124322     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.151     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. P. W. Anderson, e-print cond-mat/9812063.
2. L. P. Gor'kov and J. R. Schrieffer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3360 (1998).
3. L. Marinelli, B. I. Halperin, and S. H. Simon, Phys. Rev. B 62, 3488 (2000), and references therein.
4. M. Ya Azbel, Sov. Phys. JETP 19, 634 (1964).
5. D. R. Hofstadter, Phys. Rev. B 14, 2239 (1976).
6. Y. Morita, M. Kohmoto, and K. Maki, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 12, 989 (1998).
7. D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and M. den Nijs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 405 (1982).
8. Y. Hatsugai, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 49, 2507 (1997).
9. Y. Morita and Y. Hatsugai, Phys. Rev. B 62, 99 (2000).
10. Y. Hatsugai and M. Kohmoto, Phys. Rev. B 42, 8282 (1990).
11. M. Oshikawa, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17357 (1994).
12. Y. Hatsugai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3697 (1993); Phys. Rev. B 48, 11851 (1993).
13. Y. Hatsugai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3697 (1993); Phys. Rev. B 48, 11851 (1993).
14. R. B. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. B 23, 5632 (1981).
15. J. K. Jain, Phys. Rev. B 41, 7653 (1990).
16. I. Affleck, Z. Zou, T. Hsu, and P. W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. B 38, 745 (1988).
17. y/2) for n = (even, even), (odd, even), (even, odd), and (odd, odd), respectively. It transforms the Hamiltonian for h = Δ/t = 1, φ = p/q into the one for h = +0, (1/2 + p/q). Therefore the duality is exact.
18. A. W. W. Ludwig, M. P. A. Fisher, R. Shankar, and G. Grinstein, Phys. Rev. B 50, 7526 (1994).
19. A. A. Nersesyan, A. M. Tsvelik, and F. Wenger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2628 (1994).
20. Y. Morita and Y. Hatsugai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3728 (1997); Phys. Rev. B 58, 6680 (1998).
21. Y. Morita and Y. Hatsugai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3728 (1997); Phys. Rev. B 58, 6680 (1998).
22. 2 = 0 must hold for all sites. Since the state is not a null vector, it leads to a contradiction.
23. Y. Hatsugai, K. Ishibashi, and Y. Morita, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2246 (1999); Y. Morita, K. Ishibashi, and Y. Hatsugai, Phys. Rev. B 61, 15952 (2000).
24. Y. Hatsugai, K. Ishibashi, and Y. Morita, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2246 (1999); Y. Morita, K. Ishibashi, and Y. Hatsugai, Phys. Rev. B 61, 15952 (2000).