Game theory and its applications in power markets

Dianli Xitong Zidonghue/Automation of Electric Power Systems

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 15-18

  Diao, Qinhua ^a   Lin, Jikeng ^b   Ni, Yixin ^b   Chen, Shousun ^a  

^a TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Game theory; Nash equilibrium; Optimal decision; Power market

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC POWER TRANSMISSION; ELECTRIC RATES; GAME THEORY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

NASH EQUILIBRIUM; POWER MARKETS;

ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS;

EID: 0035111930     PISSN: 10001026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (105)

1. Samuelson P A. Microeconomics. 15th ed. McGraw Hill Inc, 1995
2. Si Chunlin. Modern Microeconomics. Shanghai: Fudan University Press, 1998
3. Schweppe F. Spot Pricing of Electricity. Kluwer Aca Pub, 1988
4. Joskow P L. Markets for Power. MIT Press, 1985
5. Einhorn M. Electricity Transmission Pricing and Technology. Kluwer Aca Pub, 1996
6. Baumol W. Transmission Pricing and Stranded Costs in the Electric Power Industry. AEP, 1995
7. Ilic M. Power Systems Restructuring: Engineering and Economics. Kluwer Aca Pub, 1998
8. Yu Erkeng. Electricity Market. Beijing: China Electric Power Press,1998
9. Yan Maosong. Value Equivalent Analysis of Electric Energy and Prediction of TOU Price. Beijing: China Electric Power Press, 1998
10. Yao Jiangang. Electricity Market Analysis. Beijing: Higher Education Press,1999
11. Sheble G B. Computational Auction Mechanisms for Restructured Power Industry Operation. Kluwer Aca Pub, 1999
12. Richter C W. Comprehensive Bidding Strategies with Genetic Programming/Finite State Automata. IEEE Trans on PWRS, 1999, 14(4)
13. Chen Geerli L. Negotiation Models for Electric Pricing and Load Dispatch in Electricity Market. Trans of IEEJ, 2000, 120-B(2)
14. Wen F S. Coordination of Bidding Strategies in Energy and Spinning Reserve Markets for Competitive Suppliers Using a Genetic Algorithm. In: IEEE PES Summer Meeting. Seattle (USA): 2000
15. Yu Z. A Stackelberg Price Leadship Model with Application to Deregulated Electricity Markets. In: IEEE PES Winter Meeting. Singapore: 2000
16. Hobbs B F. Strategic Gaming Analysis for Electric Power System: An MPEC Approach. IEEE Trans on PWRS, 2000, 15(2)
17. Yu Z. A Stackelberg Price Leadership Model with Application to Deregulated Electricity Markets. In: IEEE PES Summer Meeting. Seattle (USA): 2000
18. Dai Hongwei. A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Non-Utility Generation Projects. In: IEEE PES Winter Meeting. Singapore: 2000
19. Maiorano. Dynamics of Non-Collusive Oligopolistic Electricity Markets. In: IEEE PES Winter Meeting. Singapore: 2000
20. Morse B A. A Market Power Model with Demand Flexibility over Time for Deregulated Electricity Markets. In: IEEE PES Summer Meeting. Seattle (USA): 2000
21. David A K. Strategic Bidding in Competitive Electricity Markets: A Literature Survey. In: IEEE PES Summer Meeting. Seattle (USA): 2000
22. Xing W. A Game-Theoretic Model of Private Power Production. In: IEEE PES Summer Meeting. Seattle (USA): 2000
23. Geerli. Negotiation Models for Electricity Pricing in a Partially Deregulated Electricity Market. In: IEEE PES Summer Meeting. Seattle (USA): 2000
24. Maiorano. Novel Methodology for Simulation Studies of Stragetic Behavior of Electricity Producers. In: IEEE PES Summer Meeting. Seattle (USA): 2000
25. Hao S. A Study of Basic Bidding Strategy in Clearing Pricing Auctions. In: IEEE PES PICA. 1999
26. Li C A. Revenue Adequate Bidding Strategies in Competitive Electricity Markets. IEEE Trans on PWRS, 1999, 14(2)
27. Zhang D Y. Optimization Based Bidding Strategies in the Deregulated Market. In: IEEE PES PICA. 1999
28. Strabac G. Assessing the Competitiveness of Demand-Side Bidding. IEEE Trans on PWRS, 1999, 14(1)
29. Mielczarski W. Bidding Strategies in Electricity Markets. In: IEEE PES PICA. 1999
30. Younes Z. Generation Strategies for Gaming Transmission Constraints: Will the Deregulated Electric Power Market be an Oligopoly? Decision Support Systems, 1999, 24(3); 1999, 24(4)
31. Younes Z. Generation Strategies for Gaming Transmission Constraints: Will the Deregulated Electric Power Market be an Oligopoly? Decision Support Systems, 1999, 24(3); 1999, 24(4)
32. Wei J Y. Spatial Oligopolistic Electricity Models with Cournot Generators and Regulated Transmission Prices. Operations Research, 1999, 47(1)
33. Visudhiphan P. Dynamic Games-Based Modeling of Electricity Markets. In: IEEE PES Winter Meeting. New York: 1999
34. Song H L. Decision Making of an Electricity Suppliers Bid in a Spot Market. In: IEEE PES Summer Meeting. Edmonton (Canada): 1999
35. Gross G. Strategic Bidding in Electricity Generation Supply Markets. In: IEEE PES Winter Meeting. New York: 1999
36. Berry C A. Understanding How Market Power Can Arise in Network Competition: A Game Theoretic Approach. Utilities Policy, 1999, 8(3)
37. Fahrioglu M. Designing Cost Effective Demand Management Contracts Using Game Theory. In: IEEE PES Winter Meeting. New York: 1999
38. Yeung. Game Theoretical Multi-Agent Modeling of a Coalition Formation for Multilateral Trade. IEEE Trans on PWRS, 1999, 14(3)
39. Contreras J. Coalition Formulation in Transmission Expansion Planning. IEEE Trans on PWRS, 1999, 14(3)
40. Hobbs. Analyzing Strategic Bidding Behavior in Transmission Networks. In: IEEE Tutorial on Game Theory Applications in Electric Power Market, IEEE PES Winter Meeting. New York: 1999
41. Stoft S. Using Game Theory to Study Market Power in Simple Networks. In: IEEE Tutorial on Game Theory Applications in Electric Power Market, IEEE PES Winter Meeting. New York: 1999
42. Dekrajangpetch S. Bidding Strategies for Langrangian Relaxation Based Power Auction. In: IEEE Tutorial on Game Theory Applications in Electric Power Market, IEEE PES Winter Meeting. New York: 1999
43. Yamin H Y. Risk Management Using Game Theory in Transmission Constrained Unit Commitment Within a Deregulated Power Market. In: IEEE Tutorial on Game Theory Applications in Electric Power Market, IEEE PES Winter Meeting. New York: 1999
44. Overbye T. Market Power Evaluation in Power System with Congestion. In: IEEE Tutorial on Game Theory Applications in Electric Power Market, IEEE PES Winter Meeting. New York: 1999
45. Singh H. Market Power Mitigation. In: IEEE Tutorial on Game Theory Applications in Electric Power Market, IEEE PES Winter Meeting. New York: 1999
46. Thomas R J. Some Things Experiment Reveal About Market Power Opportunities Offered by a Constrained Transmission System. In: IEEE Tutorial on Game Theory Applications in Electric Power Market, IEEE PES Winter Meeting. New York: 1999
47. Alvarado F. The Best Game in Town: NERC's TLR Rules. In: IEEE Tutorial on Game Theory Applications in Electric Power Market, IEEE PES Winter Meeting. New York: 1999
48. DeMarco C L. Hacking with Magawatts: Gaming via Governor Control in a Competitive Enviroment. In: IEEE Tutorial on Game Theory Applications in Electric Power Market, IEEE PES Winter Meeting. New York: 1999
49. Krishna V. Intelligent Agents for Negotiations in Market Games Part 1: Model. IEEE Trans on PWRS, 1998, 13(3)
50. Krishna V. Intelligent Agents for Negotiations in Market Games Part 2: Application. IEEE Trans on PWRS, 1998, 13(3)
51. Rudkevich. Strategic Bidding in a Deregulated Generation Market: Implications for Electricity Prices, Asset Valuation and Regulatory Response. The Electricity Journal, 1998(1): 73-83
52. Ferrero R W. Application of Games with Incomplete Information for Electricity Pricing in Deregulated Power Pools. IEEE Trans on PWRS, 1998, 13(1)
53. Alvarado F L. The Stability of Power System Markets. IEEE Trans on PWRS, 1999, 14(2)
54. Richter C W. Genetic Algorithm Evolution of Utility Bidding Strategies for the Competitive Marketplace. IEEE Trans on PWRS, 1998, 13(1)
55. Rudkevich A. Modelling Electricity Pricing in a Deregulated Generation Industry: The Potential for Oligopoly Pricing in a Poolco. Energy Journal, 1998, 19(3)
56. Cardell J. Market Power and Strategic Interaction in Electricity Networks. Resource and Energy Econ, 1997, 19(1); 1997, 19(2)
57. Cardell J. Market Power and Strategic Interaction in Electricity Networks. Resource and Energy Econ, 1997, 19(1); 1997, 19(2)
58. Bai X. Transmissions Analysis by Nash Game Method. IEEE Trans on PWRS, 1997, 12(3)
59. Ferrero R W. Transaction Analysis in Deregulated Power Systems Using Game Theory. IEEE Trans on PWRS, 1997, 12(3)
60. Younes Z. Generation Strategies for Gaming Transmission Constraints: Will the Deregulated Electric Power Market Be an Oligopoly. In: Proceedings of Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'97). Hawaii: 1997
61. Oren S S. Economic Inefficiency of Passive Transmission Rights in Congested Electricity Systems with Competitive Generation. Energy J, 1997, 18(1)
62. Oren S S. Passive Transmission Rights Will not Do the Job. The Electricity J, 1997, 10(5)
63. Sakk. Power System Bidding Tournament for a Deregulated Environment. In: Proceedings of Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'97). Hawaii: 1997
64. Singh H. Power Auctions and Network Constraints. In: Proceedings of Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'97). Hawaii: 1997
65. Johnson R B. Equity and Efficiency of Unit Commitment in Competitive Electricity. Utility Policy, 1997, 6(1)
66. Lamont J W. Strategic Bidding in a Brokerage. IEEE Trans on PWRS, 1997,12(4)
67. Hogan W W. A Market Power Model with Strategic Interaction in Electricity Networks. Energy J, 1997, 18(4)
68. Ghosh K. An Options Model for Electric Power Markets. Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 1997, 19(2)
69. Ferrero R W. Energy Interchange in Deregulated Power Systems. Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 1996, 18(4)
70. Tsukamoto Y. Allocation of Fixed Transmission Cost to Wheeling Transactions by Cooperative Game Theory. IEEE Trans on PWRS, 1996, 11(2)
71. Kumar J. Auction Game in Electric Market Place. In: Proceedings of the 1996 58th American Power Conference. 1996
72. Kumar J. Framework for Energy Brokerage System with Reserve Margins and Transmission Losses. IEEE Trans on PWRS, 1996, 11(4)
73. Sheble G B. Priced Based Operation in an Auction Market Structure. IEEE Trans on PWRS, 1996, 11(4)
74. Lima J W M. An Integrated Framework for Cost Allocation in a Multi-Owned Transmission System. IEEE Trans on PWRS, 1995, 10(2)
75. Wu F F. Coordinated Multilateral Trades for Electric Power Networks: Theory and Implementation. In: Power Working Paper 031. University of California Energy Institute: 1995
76. Taylor N L. The Strategy Curve: A Method for Representing and Interpreting Generator Bidding Strategies. Utility Policy, 1995, 5(1)
77. Kuwahara. Utility-Cogenerator Game for Pricing Power Sales and Wheeling Fees. IEEE Trans on PWRS, 1995, 9(4)
78. Nishimura. Benefit Optimization of Centralized and Decentralized Power Systems in a Multi-Utility Environment. IEEE Trans on PWRS, 1993, 8(3)
79. Ruusunen J. Dynamic Cooperative Electricity Exchange in a Power Pool. IEEE Trans on SMC, 1991, 21(4)
80. Exelby M J. Competition in the UK Market for Electricity Generating Capacity - A Game-Theory Analysis. Energy Policy, 1993, 21(4)
81. David A K. Competitive Bidding in Electricity Supply. IEE P-GT & D, 140(5)
82. Haurie. A Two Player Game Model of Power Cogeneration in New England. IEEE Trans on AC, 1992, 37(9)
83. Maeda. Game Theory Approach to Use Non-Commercial Power Plants Under Time-of-Use Pricing. IEEE Trans on PWRS, 1992, 7(3)
84. Hobbs B F. Using Game Theory to Analyze Electric Transmission Policies in the United States. European Journal of Operational Research, 1992
85. Baldick R. Electricity Tariffs Under Imperfect Knowledge of Participant Benefits. IEEE Trans on PWRS, 1992, 7(4)
86. Bolle. Supply Function Equilibria and the Danger of Tacit Collusion: The Case of Spot Markets for Electricity. Energy Economics, 1992, 14(2)
87. Kelley K. Electric Transmission Access and Pricing Policies: Issues and a Game Theoretic Evaluation. In: Tech Report NRRI 90-10. Columbus: 1990
88. Klemperer P D. Supply Function Equilibria. Econometrica, 1989
89. Ehtamo. A Hierarchical Approach to Bargaining in Power Pool Management. IEEE Trans on Automation Control, 1989, 34(6)
90. Ehtamo. Solution for a Dynamic Bargaining Problem with an Application to Resource Management. J Optimization Theory and Appl, 1988, 59(3)
91. Ehtamo. On the Computation of the Nash Bargaining Solution with an Energy Management Example. In: Proceedings of 26th IEEE Conf Decision Contr. 1987
92. Hauri. A Differential Game Model of Power Exchange Between Interconnected Utility. In: Proceedings of 25th IEEE Conf Decision Contr. 1986
93. Aiyoshi E. A Solution Method for the Static Constrained Stackelberg Problem via Penalty Method. IEEE Trans on AC, 1984, 29(5)
94. Caramanis M C. Optimal Spot Pricing: Practice and Theory. IEEE Trans on PAS, 1982, 101(2)
95. Luh P B. Load Adaptive Pricing: An Emerging Tool for Electric Utilities. IEEE Trans on AC, 1982, 27
96. Breton. Efficient Management of Interconnected Power Systems: A Game Theoretic Approach. Automatica, 1978
97. Wu F F. Recent Trends of Electricity Markets. J of IEEJ, 1998
98. Tabors R D. Transmission System Management and Pricing: New Paradigms and International Comparison. IEEE Trans on PWRS. 1994, 9(2)
99. Weiss. Market Power Issues in the Restructuring of the Electricity Industry: An Experimental Investigation. Boston: Harvard Business School, 1997
100. Wolak F A. The Impact of Market Rules and Market Structure on the Price Determination Process in the England and Wales Electricity Market. Stanford: Stanford Univ, 1996
101. Wolfram C D. Strategic Bidding in a Multi-Unit Auction: An Empirical Analysis of Bids to Supply Electricity in England and Wales. Cambridge: Harvard University, 1996
102. Newbery D M. Power Markets and Market Power. Energy J, 1995
103. Tsukamoto Y. Allocation of Fixed Transmission Cost to Wheeling Transaction by Cooperative Game Theory. In: PICA'95. 1995
104. Shahidehpour M. Maintanence Scheduling in Restructured Power Systems. Kluwer Aca Pub, 2000
105. Faruqui. Pricing in Competitive Electricity Markets. Kluwer Aca Pub, 2000