Strategic gaming analysis for electric power systems: An MPEC approach

IEEE Transactions on Power Systems

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 638-645

  Hobbs, Benjamin F ^a   Metzler, Carolyn B ^a   Pang, Jong Shi ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; CONSTRAINT THEORY; DEREGULATION; ELECTRIC POWER TRANSMISSION; ELECTRIC RATES; GAME THEORY; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; MARKETING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING;

MATHEMATICAL PROGRAM WITH EQUILIBRIUM CONSTRAINTS (MPEC); OPERATING CONSTRAINTS; STRATEGIC GAMING ANALYSIS;

ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS;

EID: 0034186850     PISSN: 08858950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/59.867153     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. "Hierarchical Optimization," Annals Oper. Res., vol. 34, 1992.
2. O. Alsac and B. Stott, "Optimal Load Flow with Steady-State Security," IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Sys., vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 745-751, 1973.
3. B. Andersson and L. Bergman, "Market Structure and the Price of Electricity: An Ex Ante Analysis of Deregulated Swedish Markets," Energy ]., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 97-109, 1995.
4. S.R. Backerman, S.J. Rassenti, and V.L. Smith, "Efficiency and Income Shares in High Demand Networks: Who Gets the Congestion Rents When Lines are Congested?," Dept. of Economics, Univ. of Ariz., Jan. 1997.
5. X. Bai, S.M. Shahidehpour, V.C. Ramesh, and E. Yu, "Transmission Analysis by Nash Game Method," IEEE Trans. Power Systems, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1046-1052, 1997.
6. R. Baldick and E. Kahn, "Contract Paths, Phase-Shifters, and Efficient Electricity Trade," IEEE Trans. Power Systems, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 749-755, 1997.
7. C. Berry, B.F. Hobbs, W. Meroney, R. O'Neill, and W. Stewart, "Analyzing Strategic Bidding Behavior in Transmission Networks," IEEE Tutorial on Game Theory Applications in Power Systems, to be published.
8. B. Biewald, D.E. White, and W. Steinhurst, "Horizontal Industrial Market Structure and Market Power in New England Electricity Markets: Simulation Results and a Review of NEPOOL's Analysis," Vermont Dept. of Public Service, Tech. Rep. no. 39, 1997.
9. S. Borenstein and J. Bushnell, "An Empirical Analysis of Bohn, Spot Pricing of the Potential for Market Power in California's Electricity Industry," Univ. of Cal. Energy Inst., 1997.
10. S. Borenstein, J. Bushnell, and S. Stoft, "The Competitive Effects of Transmission Capacity in a Deregulated Electricity Industry," Univ. Calif. Energy Inst., Berkeley, ÇA, PWP-040, 1996.
11. J. Cardell, C.C. Hi, and W.W. Hogan, "Market Power and Strategic Interaction in Electricity Networks," Res. and Energy Econ., vol. 19, no. 1-2, pp. 109-137, 1997.
12. [ 12] R.W. Ferrero, S.M. Shahidehpour, and V.C. Ramesh, "Transaction Analysis in Deregulated Power Systems Using Game Theory," IEEE Trans. Power Systems, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1340-1347, 1997.
13. R. Green, "Increasing Competition in the British Electricity Spot Market," J. Ind. Econ., vol. 44, pp. 205-216, 1996.
14. R. Green and D. Newbery, "Competition in the British Electric Spot Market," J. Poli. Econ., vol. 100, pp. 929-953, 1992.
15. B.F. Hobbs and K.A. Kelly, "Using Game Theory to Analyze Electric Transmission Pricing Policies in the U.S.," Euro. J. Oper. Res., vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 154-171, 1992.
16. B.F. Hobbs and R.E. Schuler, "Assessment of the Deregulation of Electric Power Generation Using Network Models of Imperfect Spatial Competition," Papers Reg. Sci. Asso., vol. 57, pp. 75-89, 1985.
17. S. Hunt and G. Shuttleworth, Competition and Choice in Electricity, N.Y.: J. Wiley, 1996.
18. Y. Ji and B.F. Hobbs, "Including a DC Network Approximation in a Multiarea Probablistic Production Costing Model," IEEE Trans. Power Systems, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1121-1127, Aug. 1998.
19. P.D. Klemperer and M.A. Meyer, "Supply Function Equilibria," Econometrica, vol. 57, pp. 1243-1277, 1989.
20. V Krishna and V.C. Ramesh, "Intelligent Agents in Negotiations in Market Games, Part 2: Application," IEEE Irans. Power Systems, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1109-1114, Aug. 1998.
21. Z.Q. Luo, J.S. Pang, and D. Ralph, Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints, N.Y: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996.
22. T.C. Miller, T.L. Friesz, and R.L. Tobin, Equilibrium Facility Location on Networks, N.Y: Springer, 1996.
23. D.M. Newbery, "Power Markets and Market Power," Energy J., vol. 16, pp. 39-66, 1995.
24. S.S. Oren, "Economic Inefficiency of Passive Transmission Rights in Congested Electricity Systems with Competitive Generation," Energy J., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 63-83, 1997.
25. A. Rudkevich and M. Duckworth, "Strategic Bidding in a Deregulated Generation Market: Implications for Electricity Process, Asset Valuation and Regulatory Response," The Electricity Journal, Jan. 1998.
26. P.M. Scherer and D. Ross, Economic Performance, 3d ed. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1990.
27. F.C. Schweppe, M.C. Caramanis, R.E. Tabors, and R.E. Bohn, Spot Pricing of Electricity. Norwell, MA: Kluwer, 1998.
28. G. Sheble, "EPRI Auction Market Simulator: Genetic Algorithm Solution of Electric Power Markets Using Available Transfer Capability,", www.ee.istate.edu/ sheble.
29. T. Takayama and G. Judge, Spatial and Temporal Price and Allocation Models. London: North-Holland, 1971.
30. R.J. Thomas, R.D. Zimmerman, and R. Ethier, "Power Web User's Manual," School Elect. Comp. Engin., Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, PSerc 97-10, 1997.
31. N.M. von der Fehr and D. Harbord, "Spot Market Competition in the UK Electricity Industry," Econ. ]., vol. 103, pp. 531-546, 1993.
32. J. Weiss, "Market Power Issues in the Restructuring of the Electricity Industry: An Experimental Investigation," Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, Nov. 1997.
33. F.A. Wolak and R.H. Patrick, "The Impact of Market Rules and Market Structure on the Price Determination Process in the England and Wales Electricity Market," Dept. Economics, Stanford Univ., June 1996.
34. C.D. Wolfram, "Strategic Bidding in a Multi-Unit Auction: An Empirical Analysis of Bids to Supply Electricity in England and Wales," School of Business, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, July 1996.
35. A.J. Wood and B.F. Wollenberg, Power Generation, Operation and Control, 2nd ed, N.Y.: J. Wiley, 1995.
36. Z. Younes and M. Ilic, "Generation Strategies for Gaming Transmission Constraints: Will the Deregulated Electric Power Market Be an Oligopoly," in Proc., Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Jan. 6-9, 1997.
37. J.-Y. Yuan and Y Smeers, "Spatially Oligopolistic Models with Cournot Producers and Regulated Transportation Prices," Oper. Res., to be published.