Endocervical Sampling: A comparison of endocervical brush, endocervical curette, and combined brush with curette techniques

Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 1-6

  Gibson, Cheryl A ^a,d   Trask, Carol E ^a   House, Patricia ^b   Smith, Susan F ^a   Foley, Marion ^a   Nicholas, Cate ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

^b Office of Vermont Health Access   (United States)

^c Vermont Women's Health Center   (United States)

^d NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Endocervical sampling techniques

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; BIOPSY TECHNIQUE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLPOSCOPY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CURETTAGE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; SAMPLING; SQUAMOUS CELL; UTERINE CERVIX BIOPSY; UTERINE CERVIX BRUSH TECHNIQUE; UTERINE CERVIX DISEASE;

EID: 0035109880     PISSN: 10892591     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1526-0976.2001.51001.x     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Endocervical brush cytology, an alternative to endocervical curettage?
2. Sensitivity and specificity of endocervical curettage and the endocervical brush for the evaluation of the endocervical canal
3. Evaluation of the cervical canal with the endocervical brush
4. Cytobrush in evaluation of cervical dysplasia
5. Cytobrush and endocervical curettage in the diagnosis of dysplasia and malignancy of the uterine cervix
6. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the use of the endocervical brush after endocervical curettage