Cytobrush and endocervical curettage in the diagnosis of dysplasia and malignancy of the uterine cervix

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 76, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 69-73

  Mogensen, Susanne Theil ^a  

^a RANDERS REGIONAL HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Cervical dysplasia; Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN); Cytobrush; Endocervical curettage

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLPOSCOPY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CURETTAGE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; UTERINE CERVIX BIOPSY; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY; UTERINE CERVIX DYSPLASIA;

EID: 0031017868     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00016349709047788     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. Weitzman GA, Korhonen MO, Reeves KO et al. Endocervical brush cytology. An alternative to endocervical curettage? J Reprod Med 1988; 33: 677-83.
2. Frost L. Cytobrush in evaluation of cervical dysplasia. Is cervical curettage necessary? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1990; 69: 645-7.
3. Andersen W, Frierson H, Barber S et al. Sensitivity and specificity of endocervical curettage and the endocervical brush for the evaluation of the endocervical canal. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159: 702-7.