Instructional interventions in computer-based tutoring: Differential impact on learning time and accuracy

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages 97-104

  Corbett, Albert ^a   Trask, Holly ^b  

^a Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

^b American Management Systems   (United States)

Author keywords

Animation; Instructional interface design; Intelligent tutoring systems; Plan scaffolding; Student modeling

Indexed keywords

INSTRUCTIONAL INTERVENTIONS; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEM; INTERFACE DESIGNS; INTERFACE ENHANCEMENT; LEARNING TIME; PLAN SCAFFOLDING; PROGRAMMING PLANS; SECOND GENERATION; STUDENT EFFORT; STUDENT MODELING; SUBGOALS;

ANIMATION; COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; DATA STRUCTURES; HUMAN ENGINEERING; SCAFFOLDS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; LEARNING SYSTEMS; STUDENTS; USER INTERFACES;

STUDENTS; COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION;

COGNITIVE TUTOR; COMPUTER BASED TUTORING; INSTRUCTIONAL INTERFACE DESIGN; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEMS; PLAN SCAFFOLDING; STUDENT MODELING;

EID: 0033686901     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/332040.332412     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Anderson, J.R., Conrad, F. and Corbett, A.T. (1989).Skill acquisition and the LISP Tutor. Cognitive Science, 13, 467-505.
2. Anderson, J.R., Corbett, A.T., Kocdingcr, K.R., and Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 167- 207.
3. Anderson, J.R., and Lebiere, C. (1998) The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13, 4-16.
5. Cohen, P. A., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 237-248.
6. Corbett, A.T. and Anderson, J.R. (1995). Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User modeling and user-adapted interaction, 4, 253-278.
7. Corbett, A.T. and Bhatnagar, A. (1997). Student modeling in the ACT Programming Tutor: Adjusting a procedural learning model with declarative knowledge. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on User Modeling. New York: Springer-Verlag Wcin.
8. Graesser, A.C., Person, N.K., & Magliano, J.P. (1995). Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one-on-one tutoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 359-387.
9. Koedinger, K.R., Anderson, J.R., Hadley, W.H. & Mark, M.A. (1995). Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. Proceedings of the 7th World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education.
10. Pane, J.F., Corbett, A.T. and John, B.E. (1996). Assessing dynamics in computer-based instruction. Proceedings of ACM CUV96 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 197-204.
11. Rieber, L.P., Boyce, M.J., and Assad, C. (1990). The effects of computer animation on adult learning and retrieval tasks. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 17, 46-52.
12. VanLehn, K., Siler, S., Murray, C. & Bagget, W. (1998). What makes a tutorial event effective? In: M. A. Gernsbacher & S. Deny (Eds., ) Proceedings of the Twenth-first Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. pp. 1084-1089.