Root system response of C4 grass seedlings to CO2 and soil water

Plant and Soil

Volumn 231, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 97-104

  Derner, J D ^a   Polley, H W ^a   Johnson, H B ^a   Tischler, C R ^a  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Belowground response; C4 grasses; Carbon dioxide; Fine roots; Root growth; Root morphology

Indexed keywords

C4 PLANT; CARBON DIOXIDE; GRASS; ROOT SYSTEM; SOIL WATER;

ANDROPOGON GERARDII; SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM;

EID: 0035024279     PISSN: 0032079X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1010306720328     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. 2 enrichment. Aust. J. Plant. Phys. 24, 353-358.
2. Bouma T J, Nielsen K L and Koutstall B 2000 Sample preparation and scanning protocol for computerized analysis of root length and diameter. Plant Soil 218, 185-196.
3. 4 ecosystems and mammalian evolution. Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. London 353, 159-171.
4. Cerling T E, Harris J M, MacFadden B J, Leakey M G, Quade J, Eisenmann V and Ehleringer J R 1997 Global vegetation change through the Miocene/Pliocene boundary. Nature 389, 153-158.
5. 2, and climate. Oecologia 112, 285-299.
6. 4 photosynthesis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6, 95-99.
7. 4 (Panicum antitodale) grass. Aust. J. Plant. Phys. 24, 227-237.
8. 3) under high concentration of carbon dioxide. Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci. 95, 139-152.
9. Hoagland D R and Arnon D I 1950 The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif. Ag. Exper. Sta. Circ. 347, 1-39.
10. 4 grass distributions in eastern Australian rangelands. In VIth International Rangeland Congresss Proceedings Vol. 1 Eds. D Eldridge and D Freudenberger. pp 41-43. Fyshwick, ACT, Australia: Elect Printing.
11. Huckabee J W Jr, Thompson D R, Wyrick J C and Paulat E g 1977. Soil Survey Bell County Texas. USDA Soil Conservation Service, Washington, B.C. USA. 165 pp.
12. 2 and temperature under different water regimes. Global Change Biol. 2, 35-47.
13. Jacobs B F, Kingston J D and Jacobs L L 1999 The origin of grass-dominated ecosystems. Ann. Miss. Bot. Gard. 86, 590-643.
14. 4 grass Andropogon gerardii. Int. J. Plant. Sci. 154, 459-466.
15. 4 grasses. Phys. Plant. 102, 297-306.
16. 2 gradient. Funct. Ecol. 7, 125-133.
17. 3). Oecologia 114, 483-493.
18. 4). Plant Cell. Environ. 17, 1023-1033.
19. Norby R J 1994 Issues and perspectives for investigating root responses to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide. Plant Soil 165, 9-20.
20. Norby R J and Jackson R B 2000 Root dynamics and global change: seeking an ecosystem perspective. New Phytol. 147, 3-12.
21. 2. Global Change Biol. 5, 497-506.
22. 2. Ecol. Appl. 3, 644-653.
23. 4 grasses. Science 285, 876-879.
24. 2 concentration. Vegetatio 104/105, 77-97.
25. 4) at different carbon dioxide concentrations and temperatures. Ann. Bot. 79, 197-206.
26. 2 enrichment with emphasis on roots and the rhizosphere. Envrion. Pollut. 83, 155-189.
27. 2 enrichment. II. Effect of water stress. Crop Sci. 25, 533-537.
28. 2 enrichment. I. Effect of irradiance. Oecologia 65, 30-34.
29. 2 concentration: a meta-analytic test of current theories and perceptions. Global Change Biol. 5, 723-741.
30. 2. Global Change Biol. 5, 857-867.
31. 4 grass Eragrostis pilosa respond to elevated carbon dioxide and infection with the parasitic angiosperm Striga hermonthica? New Phytol. 140, 667-675.
32. 2 enrichment and soil water availability on spatial and seasonal patterns of wheat root growth. Global Change Biol. 5, 519-529.
33. 2 concentration. New Phytol 145, 245-256.