Carpentier-Edwards supraannular porcine bioprosthesis: Second-generation prosthesis in aortic valve replacement

Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 71, Issue 5 SUPPL., 2001, Pages

  Jamieson, W R Eric ^a,b   Janusz, Michael T ^a   Burr, Lawrence H ^a   Ling, Hilton ^a   Miyagishima, Robert T ^a   Germann, Eva ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b ST PAUL S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; CARPENTIER EDWARDS SUPRAANNULAR PORCINE BIOPROSTHESIS; CONFERENCE PAPER; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; EVALUATION; FATALITY; FEMALE; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; RISK FACTOR; SWINE; TREATMENT INDICATION;

ACTUARIAL ANALYSIS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE; BIOPROSTHESIS; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REOPERATION; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0035022101     PISSN: 00034975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-4975(01)02549-8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Jamieson WRE, Burr LH, Tyers GFO, et al. Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular porcine bioprosthesis: clinical performance to twelve years. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:S235-40.
2. Jamieson WRE, Ling H, Burr LH, et al. Carpentier-Edwards supraannular porcine bioprosthesis evaluation over 15 years. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:S49-52.
3. Jamieson WR, Burr LH, Munro AI, Miyagishima RT. Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis: a 21-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:S40-3.
4. Jamieson WRE, Burr LH, Miyagishima RT, Germann E, Anderson WN. Actuarial versus actual freedom from structural valve deterioration with the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprostheses: evaluation over 15 years. Can J Cardiol 1999;9:973-8.
5. Jamieson WRE, Miyagishima RT, Burr LH, Lichtenstein SV, Fradet GT, Janusz MT. Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprostheses: clinical performance assessed by actual analysis. J Heart Valve Dis 2000;9:530-5.
6. Edmunds LH Jr, Clark RE, Cohn LH, Grunkemeier GL, Miller DC, Weisel RD. Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:932-5.
7. Grunkemeier GL, Jamieson WRE, Miller DC, Starr A. Actuarial versus actual risk of porcine structural valve deterioration. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;108:709-18.
8. Grunkemeier GL, Anderson RP, Miller DC, Starr A. Time-related analysis of nonfatal heart valve complications: cumulative incidence (actual) versus Kaplan-Meier (actuarial). Circulation 1997;96(Suppl):II70-4.
9. Mahoney CB, Miller DC, Khan SS, Hill JD, Cohn LH. Twenty-year, three-institution evaluation of the Hancock modified orifice aortic valve durability. Comparison of actual and actuarial estimates. Circulation 1998;98(Suppl):II88-93.
10. Grossi EA, Galloway AC, Zakow PK, et al. Choice of mitral prosthesis in the elderly - an analysis of "actual" outcome. Circulation 1998;98(Suppl):II116-9.
11. Jamieson WRE, Rosado LJ, Munro AI, et al. Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis: primary tissue failure (structural valve deterioration) by age groups. Ann Thorac Surg 1988;46:155-62.
12. Jamieson WRE, Tyers GFO, Janusz MT, et al. Age as a determinant for selection of porcine bioprostheses for cardiac valve replacement: experience with Carpentier-Edwards standard bioprosthesis. Can J Cardiol 1991;7:181-8.
13. Jamieson WRE, Marchand MA, Pelletier CL, et al. Structural valve deterioration in mitral replacement surgery: comparison of Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular porcine and perimount pericardial bioprostheses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;118:297-304.
14. David TE, Armstrong S, Sun Z. The Hancock II bioprosthesis at twelve years. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:S95-8.