Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprostheses: Clinical performance assessed by actual analysis

Journal of Heart Valve Disease

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 530-535

  Jamieson, W R Eric ^a,b   Miyagishima, Robert T ^a   Burr, Lawrence H ^a   Lichtenstein, Samuel V ^a   Fradet, Guy J ^a   Janusz, Michael T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b ST PAUL S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; BIOPROSTHESIS; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; FOLLOW UP; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MITRAL VALVE REPLACEMENT; MORTALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; SURVIVAL; SWINE;

ACTUARIAL ANALYSIS; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; ANIMALS; AORTIC VALVE; BIOPROSTHESIS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MITRAL VALVE; REOPERATION; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; SWINE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0033862507     PISSN: 09668519     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Grunkemeier GL, Jamieson WRE, Miller DC, Starr A. Actuarial versus actual risk of porcine structural valve deterioration. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;108:709-718
2. Grunkemeier GL, Anderson RP, Miller DC, Starr A. Time-related analysis of nonfatal heart valve complications: Cumulative incidence (actual) versus Kaplan-Meier (actuarial). Circulation 1998;98(Suppl.):II-70-II-75
3. Andersen PK, Borgan O, Gill RD, Keiding N. Statistical models based on counting processes. Springer-Verlag, New York, Section 4.4, 1993
4. Jamieson WRE, Burr LH, Miyagishima RT, Germann E, Anderson WN, Jr. Actuarial versus actual freedom from structural valve deterioration with the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprostheses. Can J Cardiol 1999;15:973-978
5. Edmunds LH, Jr, Clark RE, Cohn LH, Grunkemeier GL, Miller DC, Weisel RD. Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. The American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Ad Hoc Liaison Committee for Standardizing Definitions of Prosthetic Heart Valve Morbidity. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:932-935
6. Mahoney CB, Miller DC, Khan SS, Hill JD, Cohn LH. Twenty-one, three-institution evaluation of the Hancock Modified Orifice aortic valve durability. Comparison of actual and actuarial estimates. Circulation 1998;98(Suppl.)II-88-II-94
7. Frater RW, Furlong P, Cosgrove DM, et al. Long-term durability and patient functional status of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis in the aortic position. J Heart Valve Dis 1998;7:48-53
8. Grossi EA, Galloway AC, Zakow PK, et al. Choice of mitral prosthesis in the elderly. An analysis of actual outcome. Circulation 1998;98(19 Suppl.):II-116-II-119
9. Miller CC, III, Safi HJ, Winnerkvist A, Baldwin JC. Actual versus actuarial analysis for cardiac valve complications: The problem of competing risks. Curr Opin Cardiol 1999;14:79-83