Clinical outcomes after aortic valve replacement with the toronto stentless porcine valve

Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 71, Issue 5 SUPPL., 2001, Pages

  Goldman, Bernard S ^a,b   David, Tirone E ^a,b   Wood, Jeremy R ^a,b   Pepper, John R ^a,b   Goldman, Scott M ^a,b   Verrier, Edward D ^a,b   Petracek, Michael R ^a,b  

^a SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b St Jude Medical Inc USA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE REGURGITATION; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; CONFERENCE PAPER; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; EMBOLISM; ENDOCARDITIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART DEATH; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; NONHUMAN; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SWINE; THROMBOSIS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE INSUFFICIENCY; BIOPROSTHESIS; CAUSE OF DEATH; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; STENTS; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 0035021323     PISSN: 00034975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-4975(01)02554-1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Del Rizzo D, Goldman BS, Christakis GT, et al. Haemodynamic benefits of the Toronto stentless valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:1431-8.
2. Jin XY, Gibson DG, Yacoub M, et al. Perioperative assessment of aortic homograft, Toronto stentless valve, and stented bioprosthesis in the aortic position. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:S395-401.
3. Goldman BS, Christakis GT, David TE, et al. Will stentless valves be durable? The Toronto valve (TSPV) at 5 to 6 years. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;11:42-9.
4. David TE, Feindel C, Scully HE, et al. Aortic valve replacement with stentless porcine aortic valves: a ten-year experience. J Heart Valve Dis 1998;7:250-4.
5. Silberman S, Shaheen S, Fink D, et al. Comparison of exercise hemodynamics between non-stented aortic bioprostheses, mechanical valves, and normal native aortic valves. J Card Surg 1998;13:412-6.
6. Westaby S, Huysmans H, David TE. Stentless aortic bioprostheses. Compelling data from the Second International Symposium. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;65:235-40.
7. Nagy ZL, Fisher J, Walker PG, Walterson KG. The effect of sizing on the in vitro hydrodynamic characteristics and leaflet motion of the Toronto SPV stentless valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;117:92-8.
8. Christakis GT, Buth KJ, Goldman BS, et al. Inaccurate and misleading valve sizing: a proposed standard for valve size nomenclature. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:1198-203.
9. David TE. Aortic valve replacement with stentless porcine bioprostheses. J Card Surg 1998;13:344-51.
10. Westaby S, Horton M, Jin XY, et al. Survival advantage of stentless aortic bioprostheses. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70: 785-91.