Improving systems by combining axiomatic design, quality control tools and designed experiments

Research in Engineering Design - Theory, Applications, and Concurrent Engineering

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 204-219

  Engelhardt, Fredrik ^a,b  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Axiomatic design; Design object analysis; Design of experiments; Planning for designed experiments; Problem solving; Seven quality control tools

Indexed keywords

DESIGN AIDS; QUALITY CONTROL;

AXIOMATIC DESIGN; ENGINEERING DESIGN;

SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

EID: 0035017019     PISSN: 09349839     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s001630050034     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Altshuller GS (1988) Creativity as an Exact Science. Gordon and Breach, New York
2. Andreasen MM (1980) Machine Design Methods based upon a Systematic Approach [In Danish]. Doctoral Thesis, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
3. Andreasen MM, Stören S (1993) Product development based on 'Know Your Product'-Philosophy. 4th Symposium on 'Fertigungsgerechtes Konstruieren', Egloffstein, October 14-15
4. Barlow RE (1998) Engineering Reliability. American Statistical Association and Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Alexandria, USA
5. Bastow D, Howard P, (1993) Car Suspension and Handling, 3rd Edition. Pentech Press, Society of Automotive Engineers, London, Warrandale
6. Bergman B (1992) Industriell försöksplanering och robust konstruktion [in Swedish]. Srudentlitteratur, Sweden
7. Bergman B, Klefsjö, B (1994) Quality from Customer Needs to Customer Satisfaction. McGraw-Hill, New York
8. Bergman B, Ekdahl F, Sandvik Wiklund P (1997) A comparison of selection procedures for finding active contrasts in unreplicated fractional factorial designs. Computing Science and Statistics 29(2):573-582
9. Box GEP, Hunter WE, Hunter JS (1978) Statistics for Experimenters. Wiley, New York
10. Box GEP, Meyer RD (1986) An analysis for unreplicated fractional factorials. Technometrics 28:11-18
11. Carrascosa M, Eppinger SD, Whitney DE (1998) Using the design structure matrix to estimate product development time. ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, September 13-16, Atlanta, Georgia
12. Clausing DP (1994) Total Quality Development. ASME Press, New York
13. Coleman DE, Montgomery DC (1993) A systematic approach to planning for a designed industrial experiment. Technometrics 35(1):1-14
14. Cronemyr P, Öhrwall-Rönnbäck A, Eppinger SD (1999) Process improvement simulations using the work transformation model. ICED99, International Conference on Engineering Design, Munich
15. Deming WE (1994) The New Economics. 2nd edition. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Advanced Educational Services, Cambridge, MA
16. Ekdahl F, Persson P, Sandvik Wiklund P (1999) Introducing domain knowledge for selection of active factors in designed experiments'. Paper D in F. Ekdahl's doctoral thesis "On the Application of Designed Experimentation for Customer Focused Product Development". Division of Quality Technology and Management at Linköping University. Sweden, pp 105-123
17. Engelhardt F, Meiling D (1997) Drift Pull Project on Ford Motor Company's F350 4x4 Light Truck. Master's thesis. Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden
18. Eppinger SD, Whitney DE, Smith RP, Gebala DA (1990) Organizing the tasks in complex design projects. ASME Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, New York, pp 39-46
19. Eppinger SD, Whitney DE, Smith RP, Gebala DA (1994) A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development. Res Eng Design 6(1): 1-13
20. Fleischer M, Liker JK (1997) Concurrent Engineering Effectiveness: Integrating product development across organizations. Hanser Gardner Publications, Cincinnati, OH
21. Hamada M, Wu CFJ (1992) Analysis of designed experiments with complex aliasing. J Quality Technology 23(3): 130-137
22. Hubka V, Eder WE (1988) Theory of Technical Systems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
23. Ishikawa K (1982) Guide to Quality Control. Asian Productivity Press, Tokyo, Japan
24. Kusiak A, Larson N (1995) Decomposition and representation methods in mechanical design. J Mech Design 117(B): 17-24
25. Marples DL (1961) The decisions of engineering design. IRE Trans Eng Manage EM-8(2):55-71
26. MIL-HDBK-217E (1984) Military Handbook-Reliability Prediction of Electronical Equipment. DOD, USA
27. Montgomery DC (2000) Design and Analysis of Experiments, 5th Edition. Wiley, New York
28. Myers RH, Montgomery DC (1995) Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments. Wiley, New York
29. Nordlund M (1996) An information Framework for Engineering Design based on Axiomatic Design. Doctoral Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
30. O'Connor PDT (1995) Practical Reliability Engineering. Wiley, Chichester, UK
31. Osbom AF (1957) Applied Imagination-Principles and Procedures of Creative Thinking. Revised edition. Scriber, New York
32. Pahl G, Beitz W (1996) Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. Springer-Verlag, London
33. Phadke MS (1989) Quality Engineering using Robust Design. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NY
34. Pimmler TU, Eppinger SD (1994) Integration analysis of product decompositions. ASME Sixth International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, Minneapolis, MN (also working paper #3690-94-MS at SLOAN School of Management, MIT, Cambridge, MA)
35. Pugh S (1991) Total Design. Addison-Wesley, Wokingham, UK
36. Simpson TW, Peplinski J, Koch PN, Alien JK (1997) On the use of statistics in design and the implications for deterministic computer experiments. DETC'97, Design Engineering Technical Conference, Sacramento, CA
37. Rechtin E, Maier MW (1997) The Art of Systems Architecting. CRC Press, Florida, USA
38. Senge PM (1990) The Fifth Discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday/Currency, New York
39. Steward DV (1981) The design structure system: a method for managing the design of complex systems. IEEE Trans Eng Manage EM-28(3):71-74
40. Suh NP (1990) The Principles of Design. Oxford University Press, New York
41. Tate D (1999) A Road map for Decomposition: Activities, Theories, and Tools for System Design. Doctoral Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, MA
42. Tate D, Nordlund M (1998) A design process roadmap as a general tool for structuring and supporting design activities. SDPS J Integrated Design and Process Sc 2(3): 11-19
43. Teng SH, Ho SY (1995) Reliability analysis for the design of an inflator. Quality and Reliability Eng Int 11:203-214