Objective detection of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions

Scandinavian Audiology

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 78-88

  Stürzebecher, Ekkehard ^a   Cebulla, Mario ^a   Wernecke, K D ^b  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Comparison of statistical tests; Hearing screening; Objective TEOAE detection

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NEWBORN SCREENING; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; COCHLEA; FEMALE; HEARING DISORDERS; HUMANS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS;

EID: 0035014408     PISSN: 01050397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/010503901300112185     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Aidan D, Lestang P, Avan P, Bonfils P. Characteristics of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) in neonates. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1997; 117: 25-30.
2. Bershad NJ, Rockmore AJ. On estimating signal-to-noise ratio using the sample correlation coefficient. IEEE Trans Inform Theory January 1974; 112-3.
3. Bray P, Kemp D. An advanced cochlear echo technique suitable for infant screening. Br J Audiol 1987; 21: 191-204.
4. Cebulla M, Stürzebecher E, Wernecke KD. Objective detection of auditory evoked potentials - comparison of several statistical tests in the frequency domain by means of Monte Carlo simulations. Scand Audiol 1996; 25: 201-6.
5. Cebulla M, Stürzebecher E, Wernecke KD. Objective detection of auditory brainstem potentials - comparison of statistical tests in the time and frequency domains. Scand Audiol 2000a; 29: 44-51.
6. Cebulla M, Stürzebecher E, Wernecke KD. Untersuchung verschiedener SNR-Schätzer für den Nachweis von biologischen Reizantworten im Rauschen. Z Audiol 2000b; 39: 14-22.
7. Don M, Elberling C, Waring M. Objective detection of averaged auditory brainstem responses. Scand Audiol 1984; 13: 219-28.
8. Doyle KJ, Fujikama S, Rogers P, Newman E. Comparison of newborn hearing screening by transient otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem response using ALGO-2. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1998; 43: 207-11.
9. Elberling C, Don M. Quality estimation of averaged auditory brainstem responses. Scand Audiol 1984; 13: 187-97.
10. European Consensus Statement on Neonatal Hearing Screening. European Consensus Development Conference on Neonatal Hearing Screening. Milan, 15-16 May 1998.
11. Friedman M. The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance. J Am Stat Assoc 1937; 32: 675-701.
12. Giebel A. 1998. Personal communication.
13. Hartung J. Statistik. München: Oldenburg Verlas GmbH, 1995.
14. Kemp D, Bray PJ, Alexander L, Brown AM. Acoustic emission cochleography - practical aspects. Scand Audiol 1986; Suppl 25: 71-82.
15. Lütkenhöner B. Theoretical considerations on the detection of evoked responses by means of the Rayleigh test. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1991; Suppl 491: 52-60.
16. Mardia KV. Statistics of directional data. London and New York: Academic Press, 1972.
17. Maxon AB, White KR, Vohr BR, Behrens TR. Using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions for neonatal hearing screening. Br J Audiol 1993; 27: 149-53.
18. Neely ST, Norton SJ, Gorga MP, Jestaedt W. Latency of auditory brain-stem responses and otoacoustic emissions using tone-burst stimuli. J Acoust Soc 1988; 83: 652-6.
19. NIH Consensus statement. Early identification of hearing impairment in infants and young children. Public Health Service NIH Institutes. Office of Medical Applications of Research. 1993; 11: 1-24.
20. Mehl AL, Thomson V. Newborn hearing screening: the great omission. Pediatrics 1998; 101: E4.
21. Sachs L. Angewandte Statistik. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag 1992.
22. Schimmel H. The ± reference: accuracy of estimated mean components in average response studies. Science 1967; 157: 92-3.
23. Stürzebecher E, Cebulla M, Baag M, Thie R. Verfahren zur automatischen Hörschwellenbestimmung, insbesondere bei Neugeborenen und Kleinkindern. Patent application PCT/DE96/02453, 1996.
24. Stürzebecher E, Cebulla M. Objective detection of auditory evoked potentials - comparison of several statistical tests in the frequency domain on the basis of near-threshold ABR data. Scand Audiol 1997; 26: 6-14.
25. Stürzebecher E, Cebulla M, Wernecke KD. Objective response detection in the frequency domain: comparison of several q-sample tests. Audiol Neurootol 1999; 4: 2-11.
26. Tognola G, Grandori F, Ravazzani P. Time-frequency distributions of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1997; 106: 112-22.
27. Watkin PM. Neonatal otoacoustic emission screening and the identification of deafness. Arch Dis Child 1996; 74: F16-F25.
28. Wernecke K-D. Angewandte Statistik für die Praxis. Bonn: Addison-Wesley, 1995.
29. Wong PKH, Bickford RG. Brain stem auditory evoked potentials: the use of noise estimate. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1980; 50: 25-34.
30. Zoth P. Automatisiertes Hörscreening basierend auf otoakustischen Emissionen mit mathematisch exakt definierten Wahrscheinlichkeitskriterien. Patent application DE 4441127 A1, 1994.