Substantive issues in cumulative impact assessment: A state-of-practice survey

Impact Assessment

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 15-31

  Cooper, T A ^a   Canter, L W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0008724749     PISSN: 07349165     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07349165.1997.9726119     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Canter, L. W., and Kamath, J., 1995. “Questionnaire checklist for cumulative impacts.”. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 15 (4):311–339.
2. Cada, G. F., and Hansaker, C. T., 1990. “Cumulative impacts of hydropower development:reaching a watershed in impact assessment.”. The Environmental Professional, 12:2–8.
3. Claggett, February P., 1994. Telephone conversation and personal notes, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III.
4. Clark, R., 1993. “Cumulative effects assessment:a tool for sustainable development.”, Washington, DC:Council on Environmental Quality. (Paper presented at the International Association for Impact Assessment annual conference, Shanghai, China)
5. Cocklin, C, Parker, S., and Hay, J., 1992a. “Notes on cumulative environmental change, I:concepts and issues.”. Journal of Environmental Management, 35:31–49.
6. Cocklin, C, Parker, S., and Hay, J., 1992b. “Notes on cumulative environmental change, II:a contribution to methodology.”. Journal of Environmental Management, 35:51–67.
7. Contant, C. K., and Wiggins, L. L., 1991. “Defining and analyzing cumulative environmental impacts.”. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 11 (4):297–309.
8. Cooper, T. A., 1995. “Cumulative impact assessment practice in the United States.”, M.E.S. thesis Norman, Oklahoma:University of Oklahoma.
9. Herson, A. I., and Bogden, K. M., 1991. “Cumulative impact analysis under NEPA:recent legal developments.”. The Environmental Professional, 13 (2):100–106.
10. Hochberg, R. J., Friday, M. A., and Stroup, C. F., 1993. “Review of technical approaches for cumulative ecological impact assessment.”, Annapolis, Maryland:Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Power Plant and Environmental Review Division. PPRP-109
11. Karamas, G., 1993. “Cumulative impact assessment:a comparison of federal and state environmental provisions.”. Albany Law Review, 57 (1):113–143.
12. Kennedy, A. J., 1994. Cumulative Effects Assessment in Canada:From Concept to Practice., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada:Alberta Association of Professional Biologists.
13. Lee, L. C., and Gosselink, J. G., 1988. “Cumulative impacts on wetlands:linking scientific assessments and regulatory alternatives.”. Environmental Management, 12 (5):591–602.
14. McCold, L. N., 1991. “Reducing global, regional, and cumulative impacts with the national environmental policy act.”. The Environmental Professional, 13 (2):107–113.
15. Spaling, H., and Smit, B., 1993. “Cumulative environmental change:conceptual frameworks, evaluation approaches, and institutional perspectives.”. Environmental Management, 17 (5):587–600.
16. Swick, February J., 1994. Telephone conversation, Dallas, Texas:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region VI.
17. Thatcher, T. L., 1990. “Understanding interdependence in the natural environment:some thoughts on cumulative impact assessment under the national environmental policy act.”. Environmental Law:Northwestern School of Law of Lewis and Clark College, 20 (4):611–647.