Total parenteral nutrition: Potion or poison?

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Volumn 74, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 160-163

  Jeejeebhoy, K N ^a  

^a ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

EN; Enteral nutrition; Malnutrition; Nutritional support; Review; Total parenteral nutrition; TPN

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL INJURY; ARTICLE; ATROPHY; ENTERIC FEEDING; ENTERITIS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINE FLORA; INTESTINE MUCOSA; MALNUTRITION; NUTRITIONAL SUPPORT; PANCREATITIS; SEPSIS; TOTAL PARENTERAL NUTRITION; TREATMENT INDICATION;

EID: 0034933708     PISSN: 00029165     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/74.2.160     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Total parenteral nutrition at home for 23 months without complication and with good rehabilitation. A study of technical and metabolic features
2. Home parenteral nutrition. 25 Years later
3. Long-term survival and parenteral nutrition dependence in adult patients with the short bowel syndrome
4. Total parenteral nutrition in the critically ill patient. A meta-analysis
5. Prevalence of malnutrition in nonsurgical hospitalized patients and its association with disease complications
6. Nutrition support in clinical practice: Review of published data and recommendations for future research directions. Summary of a conference sponsored by the National Institutes of Health, American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, and American Society for Clinical Nutrition
7. Perioperative nutritional support in patients undergoing hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma
8. VA TPN Cooperative Study. Perioperative total parenteral nutrition in surgical patients
9. Perioperative total parenteral nutrition in malnourished, gastrointestinal cancer patients: A randomized, clinical trial
10. Changes in intestinal absorption of nutrients and brush border glycoproteins after total parenteral nutrition in rats
11. Decreased brush border hydrolase activities without gross morphologic changes in human intestinal mucosa after prolonged total parenteral nutrition of adults
12. Small intestinal mucosa changes, including epithelial cell proliferative activity, of children receiving total parenteral nutrition (TPN)
13. Morphologic and cytoproliferative patterns of duodenal mucosa in two patients after long-term total parenteral nutrition: Changes with oral refeeding and relation to intestinal resection
14. Preoperative total parenteral nutrition is not associated with mucosal atrophy or bacterial translocation in humans
15. Parenteral versus enteral nutrition: Morphological changes in human adult intestinal mucosa
16. The prevalence of gut translocation in humans
17. Postinjury shock and early bacteremia. A lethal combination
18. Permissive underfeeding
19. Perioperative glycemic control and the risk of infectious complications in a cohort of adults with diabetes
20. Effect of nutrition on the expression of plasma soluble tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptors, membrane TNF receptors and mRNA of TNF receptors in rats receiving oral and parenteral nutrition
21. Complications associated with overfeeding of infected animals
22. Nutritional, hepatic, and metabolic effects of cachectin/tumor necrosis factor in rats receiving total parenteral nutrition
23. Comparison of the safety of early enteral vs parenteral nutrition in mild acute pancreatitis
24. Compared with parenteral nutrition, enteral feeding attenuates the acute phase response and improves disease severity in acute pancreatitis
25. Enteral nutrition is superior to parenteral nutrition in severe acute pancreatitis: Results of a randomized trial
26. Controlled trial of bowel rest and nutritional support in the management of Crohn's disease
27. Enteral versus parenteral nutrition as adjunct therapy in acute ulcerative colitis
28. TEN versus TPN following major abdominal trauma-reduced septic morbidity
29. Enteral versus parenteral feeding
30. Enteral nutrition does not prevent multiple organ failure syndrome (MOSF) after sepsis
31. Grains or veins: Is enteral nutrition really better than parenteral nutrition? A look at the evidence
32. Enteral versus parenteral nutrition: A pragmatic study