No-fault compensation for medical injuries: The prospect for error prevention

JAMA

Volumn 286, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 217-223

  Studdert, D M ^a   Brennan, T A ^a  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; IATROGENIC DISEASE; LEGAL ASPECT; MALPRACTICE; NEGLIGENCE; PATIENT CARE; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SAFETY;

EID: 0034933365     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.286.2.217     Document Type: Review

References (81)

1. Group asking U.S. for new vigilance in patient safety
2. Medical mistakes 8th top killer
3. In hospitals, to err is human, to fess up is necessary
4. Error in medicine
5. Reducing errors in medicine: It's time to take this more seriously
6. Can the United States afford a "no-fault" system of compensation for medical injury?
7. A strategy for preventing anesthesia accidents
8. Systems analysis of adverse drug events
9. Human error: Models and management
10. Reducing errors made by emergency physicians in interpreting radiographs: Longitudinal study
11. Physician reporting of adverse drug reactions
12. Physicians knowledge, attitudes, and behavior related to adverse drug events
13. Medication errors in a paediatric teaching hospital in the UK: Five years operational experience
14. Implementation of rules based computerised bedside prescribing and administration
15. Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors
16. Does housestaff discontinuity of care increase the risk for preventable adverse events?
17. Why should we report adverse incidents?
18. Congress backs away from mandatory reporting of medical errors
19. Physicians' perceptions of the risk of being sued
20. A public health approach to reducing error: Medical malpractice as a barrier
21. Expanding managed care liability
22. Clinton to order steps to reduce medical mistakes
23. Error in medicine: Legal impediments to U.S. reform
24. Risks of reporting sentinel events
25. Next target: National practitioner data bank
26. It may be politics over policy in 2000
27. To tell the truth: Ethical and practical issues in disclosing medical mistakes to patients
28. How do patients want physicians to handle mistakes?
29. Medical ethics and medical injuries: Taking our duties seriously
30. Confidentiality and privilege of peer review information: More imagined than real
31. Patient safety, risk reduction, and the law
32. When good doctors go bad
33. No-fault for medical injury: Theory and evidence
34. A fault-based administrative alternative for resolving medical malpractice claims
35. The Swedish patient compensation system: Lessons for the United States
36. No fault compensation Finnish style
37. An analysis and critique of the 1992 changes to New Zealand's accident compensation scheme
38. The Swedish patient insurance: A descriptive report
39. The case for no-fault medical liability
40. No-fault compensation for medical injury: A case study
41. The road from medical injury to claims resolution-how no-fault and tort differ
42. The jury is still in: Florida's birth-related neurological injury compensation plan after a decade
43. Medical malpractice: Facing real problems and finding real solutions
44. Costs of medical injuries in Utah and Colorado
45. Reality in the economic analysis of tort law: Does tort law really deter?
46. Tort liability and obstetricians' care levels
47. Promoting safety through workers' compensation: The efficacy and net wage costs of injury insurance
48. Experience rating matters
49. Insurance, liability, and accidents
50. Liability v. no-fault automobile insurance regimes: An analysis of the experience in Quebec
51. Drinking, driving, and the price of automobile insurance
52. Deterrent aspects of no-fault automobile insurance: Some empirical findings
53. Re-analyses of the effects of no-fault auto insurance on fatal crashes
54. Perpetuating risk? Workers' compensation and the persistence of occupational injuries
55. Experience-rating: Does it make sense for medical malpractice insurance?
56. Malpractice claims data as a quality improvement tool, II: Is targeting effective?
57. Enterprise medical liability and the evolution of the American health care system
58. Enterprise liability for medical malpractice and health care quality improvement
59. Malpractice claims data as a quality improvement tool, I: Epidemiology of error in four specialties
60. Workers' compensation and occupational injuries and illnesses
61. Enterprise medical liability and the choice of the responsible enterprise
62. Towards a workable model of "no-fault" compensation for medical injury in the United States