CSE for labour: The debate goes on...

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia

Volumn 48, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 519-521

  Gunka, V B ^a   Douglas, M J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUPIVACAINE; FENTANYL; PROPOFOL; SUFENTANIL; THIOPENTAL;

CEREBROSPINAL FLUID; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG COST; DRUG POTENCY; EDITORIAL; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDWELLING CATHETER; LOCAL ANESTHESIA; OBSTETRIC ANALGESIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIDE EFFECT; SPINAL ANESTHESIA; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SUBARACHNOID SPACE; TIME; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0034928136     PISSN: 0832610X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03016824     Document Type: Editorial

References (4)

1. Either sufentanil or fentanyl, in addition to intrathecal bupivacaine, provide satisfactory early labour analgesia
2. The dose-response relation of intrathecal fentanyl for labor analgesia
3. Combined spinal epidural (CSE) analgesia: Technique, management and outcome of 300 mothers
4. Speed of onset of regional analgesia in labour: A comparison of the epidural and spinal routes