Land application of sewage sludge: Perceptions of New Jersey vegetable farmers

Waste Management and Research

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 115-125

  Krogmann, U ^a   Glibson, V ^b   Chess, C ^b  

^a Rutgers University   (United States)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Farmer; Food crops; Land application; Risk perception; Sewage sludge

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; CROPS; HEAVY METALS; IMPURITIES; SOILS;

ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS;

SEWAGE SLUDGE;

HEAVY METAL;

FARMERS ATTITUDE; PERCEPTION; RISK PERCEPTION; SEWAGE DISPOSAL;

AGRICULTURAL WORKER; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROP; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ENVIRONMENT; HUMAN; INFORMATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; INTERVIEW; ODOR; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEWAGE TREATMENT; SLUDGE; SOIL; VEGETABLE; WATER CONTAMINATION;

NEW JERSEY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0034897091     PISSN: 0734242X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0734242X0101900204     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Sludge and slurry disposal techniques and environmental problems - A review
2. Manual of good practice for agricultural land application of biosolids
3. Fearing Fear: Communication about agricultural biotechnology
4. Assessment of the 1996 disinfection practice survey on biosolids, along with additional information from WEF Disinfection Committee and WEF Residuals/Biosolids Committee
5. Land application of biosolids for agricultural purposes in Virginia
6. Technical and democratic values in risk analysis
7. A guide to controversy
8. Interviewing: The art of science
9. Sludge management in lower Austria: Policy related issues in land application of sewage sludge
10. An assessment of attitudes and beliefs about sewage sludge management strategies in New York
11. Unsafe sewage sludge or beneficial biosolids: Liability, planning, and management issues regarding the land application of sewage treatment residuals
12. Biosolids management update
13. Quality of agricultural produce: Consumer preferences and perceptions
14. Information and farmers' attitudes about pesticides, water quality, and related environmental effects
15. Balancing benefits and risks in biosolids
16. Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing
17. Qualitative data analysis
18. New Jersey pollutant discharge elimination system
19. Sludge quality assurance
20. Volatile emissions from livestock farming and sewage operations
21. Use of reclaimed water and sludge in food production
22. Understanding risk: Informing decisions in a democratic society
23. Sludge: Benefit or Blight
24. Using computers in qualitative research
25. Sludge under suspicion: Explaining perceptions of risks from a relatively 'unknown' technology
26. Perception of risk
27. Standards for the use or disposal of sewage sludge
28. Land area, population, and density for states and counties: 1990
29. Clean water needs survey report to congress. 1996: Assessment of needs for publicly owned wastewater treatment facilities, Correction of combined sewer overflows and management of storm water and non-point United States
30. Sheep farming after Chernobyl: A case study in communicating scientific information
31. Survey of public perceptions of environmental risk: New York City sludge management plan