Fearing fear: Communication about agricultural biotechnology

AgBioForum

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 17-21

  Chess, Caron ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0004440498     PISSN: 1522936X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Almas, R. & Nygard B. (1995). New biotechnologies: Attitudes, social movements, and regulation. Prague: European Congress of Rural Sociology.
2. Barefoot, S.F., Beachy, R.N., & Lilburn M.S. (1994). Labeling of food-plant biotechnology products. Cereal Foods World, 39 , 760-765.
3. Chess, C. (1995). The public and agricultural biotechnology: Key questions. In R. W. Hardy & J. B. Segelken (Eds.). Ithaca: National Agricultural Biotechnology Council , (pp. 93-100).
4. Fife-Shaw, C. & G. Rowe. (1996). Public perceptions of everyday food hazards: A psychometric study. Risk Analysis, 16, 487-500.
5. Freudenburg, W. & Rurch J. (1994). The Risks of putting the numbers in context: A Cautionary tale. Risk Analysis, 14 (6) , 949-958.
6. Frewer, L., Howard C., & Shepherd R. (1997). Public concern in the United Kingdom about general and specific applications of genetic engineering: Risk, benefits, and ethics. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 22(1) , 98-124.
7. Frewer, L., Shepherd R., & Sparks P. (1994). The interrelationship between perceived knowledge, control, and risk associated with a range of food related hazards targeted at the self, other people, and society. Journal of Food Safety, 14, 19-40.
8. Hallman, W., & Metcalfe J. (1993). Public perceptions of agricultural biotechnology: A survey of New Jersey residents. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University's Ecosystem Policy Research Center.
9. Hance, B. J., Chess C., & Sandman P.M. (1988). Improving dialogue with communities: A Risk communication manual for government.
10. Johnson, B. (1993). Advancing of knowledge's role in lay risk perception. In Risk: Issues in health, safety, and the environment, pp. 190-212.
11. Kraus, N., Malmfors T., & Slovic P. (1992). Intuitive toxicology: Expert and lay judgements of chemical risks. Risk Analysis, 12(2) 215-.
12. Labelling [sic] the mutant tomato. (1997, August 7). Economist , 54, p. 344.
13. Morgan, G., Fischhoff B., Bostrom A., & Lave L. (1992). Communicating risk to the public: First learn what people know and believe. Environmental Science and Technology, 28(11), 2049-2055.
14. Office of Cancer Communications. (1989). Making health communications work: A planner's guide. Washington, D.C.: National Institutes of Health, pp. 89-1493.
15. Rayner, S. (1992). Cultural theory and risk analysis. In S. Krimsky & D. Golding (Eds.), Social theories of risk (pp. 83-116). Westport: Praeger.
16. Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280-285.
17. Staff. (1987). New developments in biotechnology. Washington D.C.: Office of Technology Assessment
18. Zechendorf, B. (1994). What the public thinks about biotechnology. Bio/Technology, 12, 870-875.