|
Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 197-201
|
Helical CT without contrast in choledocholithiasis diagnosis
|
Author keywords
Bile duct; Choledocholithiasis; ERCP; Helical CT; Retrograde cholangiography
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
AGE;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
BILE DUCT;
BILE DUCT DILATATION;
CHOLANGIOGRAPHY;
CLINICAL ARTICLE;
COMMON BILE DUCT STONE;
COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY;
CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY;
DIAGNOSTIC VALUE;
ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY;
FEMALE;
GENDER;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
MALE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROSPECTIVE STUDY;
SCREENING;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
TIME;
VATER PAPILLA;
ADULT;
AGED;
AGED, 80 AND OVER;
AMPULLA OF VATER;
CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE;
CONTRAST MEDIA;
DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL;
FEMALE;
GALLSTONES;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;
|
EID: 0034884810
PISSN: 09387994
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1007/s003300000609 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (40)
|
References (20)
|