|
Volumn 16, Issue 9, 2001, Pages 1728-1729
|
Letters to the editor: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence - Redundancy blocks determination of cause and effect [1]
a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
2 AMINO 5 PHOSPHONOVALERIC ACID;
DIZOCILPINE;
GLUTAMATE RECEPTOR;
N METHYL DEXTRO ASPARTIC ACID;
N METHYL DEXTRO ASPARTIC ACID RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT;
AMINO ACID RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT;
AMINO ACID RECEPTOR STIMULATING AGENT;
DIZOCILPINE MALEATE;
GLUTAMATE TRANSPORTER;
GLUTAMIC ACID;
N METHYL DEXTRO ASPARTIC ACID RECEPTOR;
N METHYLASPARTIC ACID;
ANIMAL CELL;
ANIMAL MODEL;
BONE CELL;
CELL DIFFERENTIATION;
GENE EXPRESSION;
KNOCKOUT MOUSE;
LETTER;
MOUSE;
NONHUMAN;
OSTEOBLAST;
OSTEOLYSIS;
SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;
ANIMAL;
BONE DEVELOPMENT;
CYTOLOGY;
DRUG ANTAGONISM;
DRUG EFFECT;
METABOLISM;
NOTE;
PHYSIOLOGY;
2-AMINO-5-PHOSPHONOVALERATE;
AMINO ACID TRANSPORT SYSTEM X-AG;
ANIMALS;
BONE RESORPTION;
DIZOCILPINE MALEATE;
EXCITATORY AMINO ACID AGONISTS;
EXCITATORY AMINO ACID ANTAGONISTS;
GLUTAMIC ACID;
N-METHYLASPARTATE;
OSTEOBLASTS;
OSTEOGENESIS;
RECEPTORS, N-METHYL-D-ASPARTATE;
|
EID: 0034860641
PISSN: 08840431
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.9.1728 Document Type: Letter |
Times cited : (10)
|
References (13)
|