Modeling and analysis of gas coolers

ASHRAE Transactions

Volumn 107 PART. 1, Issue , 2001, Pages 4-13

  Fang, X ^a   Bullard, C W ^a   Hrnjak, P S ^a  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY OF AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HEAT TRANSFER; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; PRESSURE DROP; REFRIGERANTS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; TEMPERATURE; THERMODYNAMICS;

GAS COOLERS; REFRIGERANT TEMPERATURE;

AUTOMOBILE COOLING SYSTEMS;

EID: 0034836828     PISSN: 00012505     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics of flat tube and louvered plate fin surfaces
2. A generalized heat transfer correlation for louver fin geometry
3. Heat transfer and flow characteristics of automotive brazed aluminum heat exchangers
4. Friction-factor equation spans all fluid-flow regimes
5. Correlation for heat transfer and flow friction characteristics of louvered fin
6. Modeling and analysis of gas coolers
7. New equations for heat and mass transfer in turbulent pipe and channel flow
8. 2 versus conventional R134a
9. REFPROP refrigerant properties database: Capabilities, limitations, and future directions
10. Friction factors for pipe flow
11. Heat transfer and resistance of carbon dioxide being cooled in the supercritical region
12. On heat exchange at turbulent flow of liquid in pipes
13. Heat transfer from supercritical carbon dioxide in tube flow: A critical review
14. 2 - Heat pump water heaters
15. Heat transfer analysis of air-to-carbon dioxide two-phase absorption and supercritical heat rejection
16. Calculation and simulation of a heat exchanger: Supercritical carbon dioxide-water
17. A new equation of state for carbon dioxide covering the fluid region from the triple-point to 1100 K at pressures up to 800 MPa
18. Correlation of j- and f-factors for multilouvered heat transfer surfaces
19. The transport properties of carbon dioxide
20. 2 versus R134a and R410 system performance