Consumer ratings of edible flower quality, mix, and color

HortTechnology

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 644-647

  Kelley, K M ^a   Behe, B K ^a   Biernbaum, J A ^a   Poff, K L ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Begonia x tuberhybrida; Borage; Borago officinalis; Damage; Economics; Nasturtium; Pansy; Perception; Survey; Tropaeolum majus; Tuberous begonia; Viola; Viola tricolor; Viola x wittrockiana; Visual

Indexed keywords

BEGONIA; BEGONIA TUBERHYBRIDA; BORAGINACEAE; BORAGO; BORAGO OFFICINALIS; INSECTA; NASTURTIUM OFFICINALE; TROPAEOLACEAE; TROPAEOLUM MAJUS; VIOLA (ANGIOSPERM); VIOLA TRICOLOR; VIOLA WITTROCKIANA; VIOLACEAE;

EID: 0034775912     PISSN: 10630198     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21273/horttech.11.4.644     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Coffee, tea and espresso
2. Consumer preferences for geranium flower color, leaf variegation, and price
3. Marketing scales handbook: A compilation of multi-item measures
4. Quality control
5. Companies put new twists
6. Keys to maintaining customer loyalty
7. Exotics: What to do with them
8. Consumer preference of edible-flower color, container size, and price
9. Consumer and chef perceptions of three edible flower species
10. Selling edible flowers
11. The eyes have it
12. Fresh flower merchandising in loose bunches
13. Edible flowers, fresh herbs, baby vegetables: Still room for growth
14. Overcoming organic supply issues
15. In my opinion: Consumers want value
16. All-American markets