Re: Is the optimal tilt really unknown?

PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Volumn 24, Issue 10, 2001, Pages 1577-1578

  Irnich, W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL GIESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARDIOVERSION; DEFIBRILLATION; DEFIBRILLATOR; DEVICE; HEART FIBRILLATION; IMPLANTATION; LETTER; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

EID: 0034775510     PISSN: 01478389     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.00128.x     Document Type: Letter

References (8)

1. Prospective randomized comparison of 50%/50% versus 65%/65% tilt biphasic waveform on defibrillation in humans
2. Optimal truncation of defibrillation pulses
3. Relative efficacy of different tilts with biphasic defibrillation in humans
4. To the Editor
5. The effect of biphasic wave form tilt in transvenous atrial defibrillation
6. To the Editor
7. Optimized pulse durations minimize the effect of polarity reversal on defibrillation efficacy with biphasic shocks
8. To the Editor