Effects of an informational intervention on public reactions to clear-cutting

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 14, Issue 9, 2001, Pages 777-790

  Kearney, A R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Acceptability; Clear cut; Expertise; Forest management; Visual preference

Indexed keywords

CLEARCUTTING; PERCEPTION; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; VISUAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0034772447     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/089419201753210594     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Land use designations affect perception of scenic beauty in forest landscapes
2. The use of interpretation to gain visitor acceptance of vegetation management
3. Cognitive coping strategies and the problem of "inert knowledge"
4. Using examples and analogies to remediate misconceptions in physics: Factors influencing conceptual change
5. Aesthetic impacts of southern pine beetle damage
6. The effects of people and man-induced conditions on preferences for outdoor recreation landscapes
7. The aesthetic experience of sustainable forest ecosystems
8. Interestingness-A neglected variable in discourse processing
9. Strategies for increasing text-based interest and students' recall of expository texts
10. Implied human influence reduces landscape beauty
11. Predictors of environmental preference: Designers and "clients"
12. Preference and everyday nature: Method and application
13. An informal model for the prediction of preference
14. Understanding global change: A cognitive perspective on communicating through story
15. A general survey of the Guttman-Lingoes non-metric program series
16. Mathematics and science learning: A new conception
17. The aesthetics of forestry: What has empirical preference research taught us?
18. Regeneration harvests versus clearcuts: Public views of the acceptability and aesthetics of Northwest Forest Plan harvests
19. Landscape assessment and perception research methods
20. Human responses to vegetation and landscapes
21. The assessment of landscape quality: Major methodological considerations