Regeneration harvests versus clearcuts: Public views of the acceptability and aesthetics of Northwest Forest Plan harvests

Northwest Science

Volumn 73, Issue SPEC. ISS., 1999, Pages 102-117

  Ribe, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDINAL SURVEY; FOREST MANAGEMENT; PERCEPTION; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; TIMBER HARVESTING;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032965849     PISSN: 0029344X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Anderson, L. M. 1981. Land use designations affect perception of scenic beauty in forest landscapes. For. Sci. 27:392-400.
2. Bengston, D. N. 1994. Changing forest values and ecosystem management. Soc. Nat. Resour. 7:515-534.
3. Benson, R. E., and J. R. Ullrich. 1981. Visual impacts of forest management activities: findings on public preferences. USDA For. Serv., Res. Pap. INT-262.
4. Brunson, M. W. 1993. "Socially acceptable" forestry: what does it imply for ecosystem management? West. J. Appl. For. 8:116-119.
5. Brunson, M. W., and D. K. Reiter. 1996. Effects of ecological information on judgments about scenic impacts of timber harvest. J. Environ. Manage. 46:31-41.
6. Brunson, M. W., and B. Shelby. 1992. Assessing recreational and scenic quality: how does "new forestry" rate? J. For. 90(7):37-41.
7. Carls, E. G. 1974. The effects of people and man-induced conditions on preferences for outdoor recreation landscapes. J. Leis. Res. 6:113-124.
8. th North Amer. Symp. on Soc. and Resour. Manage., Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
9. Dana, S. T., and S. K. Fairfax. 1980. Forest and Range Policy: Its Development in the United States. McGraw Hill, New York.
10. Davidson, A. R., S. Yantis, M. Norwood and D. E. Montano. 1985. Amount of information about the attitude object and attitude-behavior consistency. J. Pers. Soc. Psych. 49:1184-1198.
11. Dearden, P. 1989. Societal landscape preferences: a pyramid of influences. In P. Dearden, and B. Sadler (eds.). Landscape Evaluation: Approaches and Applications. Western Geographical Series, Vol. 25. Victoria, B.C. Pp. 41-63.
12. Devall, B. (ed.). 1994. Clearcut: The Tragedy of Industrial Forestry. Sierra Club, San Francisco.
13. Dietrich, W. 1992. The Final Forest: The Battle for the Last Great Trees of the Pacific Northwest. Simon and Schuster, New York.
14. Durbin, K. 1996. Tree Huggers: Victory, Defeat, and Renewal in the Northwest Ancient Forest Campaign. Mountaineers, Seattle.
15. st Century: The Science of Ecosystem Management. Island Press, Washington, D.C. Pp. 111-139.
16. Fritz, E. C. 1989. Clearcutting: A Crime Against Nature. Eakin Press, Austin.
17. Gillis, A. M. 1990. The new forestry: an ecosystem approach to land management. BioScience 40:558-562.
18. Gobster, P. H. 1994. The aesthetic experience of sustainable forest ecosystems. In W. Covington, and L. F. DeBano (eds.). Sustainable ecological systems: implementing an ecological approach to land management. USDA For. Serv., Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-247. Pp. 246-255.
19. _. 1995. Aldo Leopold's "ecological esthetic": integrating esthetic and biodiversity values. J. For. 93(2):6-10.
20. _. 1996. Forest aesthetics, biodiversity, and the perceived appropriateness of ecosystem management practices. In M. W. Brunson, L. E. Kruger, C. B. Tyler, and S. A. Schroeder (eds.). Defining social acceptability in ecosystem management: a workshop proceedings. USDA For. Serv., Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-369. Pp. 77-97.
21. Halpern, C. B., S. A. Evans, C. R. Nelson, D. McKenzie, D. A. Liguori, D. E. Hibbs, and M. G. Halaj. 1999. Response of forest vegetation to varying levels and patterns of green-tree retention: an overview of a long-term experiment. Northw. Sci. 73 (Spec. Iss.): 27-44.
22. Hansis, R. 1995. The social acceptability of clearcutting in the Pacific Northwest. Hum. Org. 54:95-101.
23. Hays, S. P. 1987. Beauty, Health, and Permanence: Environmental Politics in the United States, 1955-1985. Cambridge, New York.
24. Hirt, P. 1994. A Conspiracy of Optimism: Management of the National Forests Since World War II. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.
25. Hodgson, R. W., and R. L. Thayer. 1980. Implied human influence reduces landscape beauty. Landscape Plann. 7:171-179.
26. Horwitz, E. C. J. (ed.). 1974. Clearcutting: A View From the Top. Acropolis, Washington, D.C.
27. Hull, R. B., IV, G. J. Buhyoff, and T. C. Daniel. 1984. Measurement of scenic beauty: the law of comparative judgement and scenic beauty estimation procedures. For. Sci. 30:1084-1096.
28. Ittelson, W. H., K. A. Franck, and T. J. O'Hanlon. 1976. The nature of environmental experience. In S. Wapner, S. B. Cohen, and B. Kaplan (eds.). Experiencing the Environment. Plenum, New York. Pp. 187-206.
29. Iverson, W. D. 1985. And that's about the size of it: visual magnitude as a measurement of the physical landscape. Landscape J. 4:14-22.
30. Izard, C. E. 1977. Human Emotions. Plenum, New York.
31. Jones, J. R., R. Martin, and E. T. Bartlett. 1995. Ecosystem management: the U. S. Forest Service's response to social conflict. Soc. Nat. Resour. 8:161-168.
32. Kellert, S. R. 1983. Affective, cognitive, and evaluative perceptions of animals. In I. Altman, and J. F. Wohlwill (eds.). Human Behavior and Environment, Vol. 6. Plenum, New York. Pp. 241-267.
33. Kenner, B., and S. F. McCool. 1985. Thinning and scenic attractiveness in second growth forests: a preliminary assessment. For. Cons. Exp. Sta. Res. Note 22. University of Montana, Missoula.
34. Kimmins, J. P. 1992. Balancing Act: Environmental Issues in Forestry. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, B.C.
35. st Century: The Science of Ecosystem Management. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
36. Lyons, E. 1983. Demographic correlates of landscape preference. Environ. Behav. 15:437-511.
37. McCool, S. F., R. E. Benson, and J. L. Ashor. 1986. How the public perceives the visual effects of timber harvesting: an evaluation of interest group preferences. Environ. Manage. 10:385-391.
38. Nassauer, J. I. 1992. The appearance of ecological systems as a matter of policy. Landscape Ecol. 6:239-250.
39. Native Forest Council. 1987-98. Forest Voice (quarterly newsletter of forest protection advocacy group). Eugene, Oregon.
40. Oregonian. 1990. Forests in distress: northwest forests, day of reckoning (special supplement to the October 15, 1990 newspaper issue). Portland, Oregon.
41. Palmer, J. F., S. Shannon, M. A. Harrilchak, P. H. Gobster, and T. Kokx. 1995. Esthetics of clearcutting: alternatives in the White Mountain National Forest. J. For. 93(5):37-42.
42. st Century: The Science of Ecosystem Management. Island Press, Washington, D.C. Pp. 31-56.
43. Pukkala, T., S. Kellomaki, and E. Mustonen. 1988. Prediction of the amenity of a tree stand. Scandinavian J. For. Res. 3:533-544.
44. Ribe, R. G. 1989. The aesthetics of forestry: what has empirical preference research taught us? Environ. Manage. 13:55-74.
45. Ruddell, E. J., J. H. Gramann, V. A. Rudis, and J. M. Westphal. 1989. The psychological utility of visual penetration in near-view forest scenic beauty models. Environ. Behav. 21:393-412.
46. Russell, J. A., L. M. Ward, and G. Pratt. 1981. Affective quality attributed to environments: a factor analytic study. Environ. Behav. 13:259-288.
47. Rutherford, W., and E. L. Shafer. 1969. Selection cuts increased natural beauty in two Adirondack forest stands. J. For. 67(12):415-419.
48. Santayana, G. 1896. The Sense of Beauty. Scribner's, New York.
49. Schroeder, H. W. 1984. Environmental perception rating scales: a case for simple methods of analysis. Environ. Behav. 16:573-598.
50. Schroeder, H. W., P. H. Gobster, and R. Frid. 1993. Visual quality of human-made clearings in Central Michigan conifers. USDA For. Serv., Res. Pap. NC-313.
51. Simpson, C. J., T. L. Rosenthal, T. C. Daniel, and G. M. White. 1976. Social influence variations in evaluating managed and unmanaged forest areas. J. Appl. Psych. 61:759-767.
52. Stankey, G. H., and R. N. Clark. 1992. Social Aspects of New Perspectives in Forestry: A Problem Analysis. Grey Towers Press, Milford.
53. Steel, B. S., P. List, and B. Shindler. 1994. Conflicting values about federal forests: a comparison of national and Oregon publics. Soc. Nat. Resour. 7:137-153.
54. Taylor, J. G., and T. C. Daniel. 1985. Perceived scenic and recreational quality of forest burn areas. In J. E. Lotan (ed.). Proceedings - symposium and workshop on wilderness fire, 1983. USDA For. Serv., Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-182. Pp. 398-406.
55. Tichenor, P., G. Donahue, C. N. Olien, and J. K. Bowers. 1971. Environment and public opinion. J. Environ. Ed. 2:38-42.
56. Tips, W. E. J., and T. Savasdidara. 1986. The influence of environmental background of subjects on their landscape preference evaluations. Landscape Urban Plann. 13:125-133.
57. Tlusty, W. G. 1992. Visual and recreation values of white pine. In R. A. Stine, and M. J. Boughman (eds.). White pine symposium proceedings. Univ. Minnesota Ext. Serv. Publ. NR-BU-6044. Pp. 84-97.
58. Tremblay, K. R., and R. Dunlap. 1978. Rural-urban residence and concern with environmental quality. Rural Sociol. 43:474-491.
59. Ulrich, R. S. 1983. Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In I. Altman, and J. F. Wohlwill (eds.). Human Behavior and Environment, Vol. 6. Plenum, New York. Pp. 85-125.
60. _. 1986. Human responses to vegetation and landscapes. Landscape Urban Plann. 13:29-44.
61. USDA and USDI. 1994. Record of decision for amendments to Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management planning documents within the range of the northern spotted owl. USDA For. Serv., Portland, Oregon.
62. Vining, J. 1992. Environmental emotions and decisions: a comparison of the responses and expectations of forest managers, an environmental group, and the public. Environ. Behav. 24:3-34.
63. Vogt, K. A., J. C. Gordon, J. P. Wargo, and D. J. Vogt. 1997. Ecosystems: Balancing Science with Management. Springer, New York.
64. Wilkenson, C. F., and H. M. Anderson. 1987. Land and Resource Planning in the National Forests. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
65. Wood, N. 1971. Clearcut: A Sierra Club Battle Book. Sierra Club, San Francisco.
66. Zajonc, R. B. 1980. Feeling and thinking: preferences need no inferences. Am. Psychol. 35:151-175.
67. Zube, E. H., J. L. Sell, and J. G. Taylor. 1982. Landscape perception: research, application and theory. Landscape Plann. 9:1-33.