Speech perception and functional benefit after multichannel cochlear implantation

Scandinavian Audiology, Supplement

Volumn 30, Issue 52, 2001, Pages 45-47

  Välimaa, Taina T ^a,c   Sorri, Martti J ^b,c   Löppönen, Heikki J ^c  

^a Department of Finnish Saami and Logopedics ^*  (Finland)

^b Center for Wellness Technology   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Functional benefit; Multichannel cochlear implantation; Postlingual profound hearing impairment; Speech recognition

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONFERENCE PAPER; FEMALE; HEARING AID; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HEARING TEST; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND DETECTION; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; WORD RECOGNITION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FOLLOW UP; INSTRUMENTATION; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; DEAFNESS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0034744852     PISSN: 01078593     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Archbold S. Implementing a paediatric cochlear implant programme: theory and practice. In: McCormick P, Archbold S, Sheppard S, eds. Cochlear implants for young children. London: Whurr, 1994; 25-59.
2. Cohen NL, Waltzman SB, Fisher SG. The department of veterans affairs cochlear implant study group. A prospective randomized study of cochlear implants. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 233-7.
3. Kessler DK, Osberger MJ, Boyle P. Clarion® patient performance: an update on the adult and children's clinical trials. Scand Audiol 1997; Suppl 47: 45-9.
4. Kiefer J, Muller J, Pfennigdorff T, Schon F, Helms J, von Ilberg C, et al. Speech understanding in quiet and in noise with the CIS speech coding strategy (Med-El Combi-40) compared to the Multipeak and Spectral Peak strategies (Nucleus). ORL 1996; 58: 127-35.
5. Knutson JF, Murray KT, Husarek S, Westerhouse K, Woodworth G, Gantz BJ, et al. Psychological change over 54 months of cochlear implant use. Ear Hear 1998; 19: 191-201.
6. Lonka E. Aikuinen huonokuuloinen ja huulioluvun oppiminen - huuliolukumenetelmän seurantatutkimus [Licenciate study in Logopedics]. Helsinki: Helsinki University, 1993.
7. Ludvigsen C. Construction and evaluation of an audiovisual test (the Helen test). Scand Audiol 1974; Suppl 4: 67-82.
8. Maillet CJ, Tyler RS, Jordan HN. Change in the quality of life of adult cochlear implant patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1995; Suppl 165: 31-48.
9. Palva T. Finnish speech audiometry: methods and clinical applications [dissertation]. Turku, Finland: Turku University, 1952.
10. Whitford LA, Seligman PM, Everingham CE, Antognelli T, Skok MC, Hollow RD, et al. Evaluation of the Nucleus Spectra 22 processor and new speech processing strategy (SPEAK) in postlinguistically deafened adults. Acta Otolaryngol 1995; 115: 629-37.
11. van Dijk JE, Olphen AF, Langereis MC, Mens LHM, Brokx JPL, Smoorenburg GF. Predictors of cochlear implant performance. Audiology 1999; 38: 109-16.