Impacts of a global climate cycle on population dynamics of a migratory songbird

Science

Volumn 288, Issue 5473, 2000, Pages 2040-2043

  Sillett, T Scott ^a   Holmes, Richard T ^a   Sherry, Thomas W ^b  

^a Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory   (United States)

^b Tulane University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIRD; CLIMATE CHANGE; EL NINO-SOUTHERN OSCILLATION; GLOBAL CLIMATE; MIGRATORY BEHAVIOR; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SONG;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; BIRD; FERTILITY; GLOBAL CLIMATE; MIGRATION; NONHUMAN; OSCILLATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TROPICS;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CLIMATE; FEMALE; FERTILITY; FLIGHT, ANIMAL; FOOD; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; MALE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SEASONS; SONGBIRDS; WEATHER;

ANIMALIA; AVES; DENDROICA CAERULESCENS; PASSERI;

EID: 0034674741     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.288.5473.2040     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. C. S. Robbins, J. R. Sauer, R. Greenberg, S. Droege, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86, 7658 (1989).
2. P. P. Marra, K. A. Hobson, R. T. Holmes, Science 282, 1884 (1998).
3. R. T. Holmes, in The Birds of North America, No. 87, A. Poole and F. Gill, Eds. (Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, and American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, DC, 1994), pp. 1-22.
4. Monthly SOI values can be found at www.cpc.ncep. noaa.gov/data/indices/.
5. G. N. Kiladis and H. F. Diaz, J. Clim. 2, 1069 (1989).
6. Survivorship data were based on resightings of color-banded individuals (n = 151 birds in Jamaica; n = 550 birds in New Hampshire). Populations at each site were censused annually, returning marked birds were considered "resighted," and unmarked individuals were captured in mist-nets and given a unique combination of colored leg bands. Warbler abundance at both sites was stable (R. T. Holmes and T. W. Sherry, unpublished data). Sex and age ratios at both locations were comparable; about 60% of birds were male and 57% of birds were 1 year old or older. Warblers banded at the New Hampshire site have never been resighted on winter quarters, nor have birds banded at the Jamaica site been resighted in breeding areas.
7. A. M. Strong and T. W. Sherry, J. Anim. Ecol., in press.
8. P. P. Marra and R. L. Holberton, Oecologia 116, 284 (1998).
9. J. C. Rogers, J. Clim. 1, 172 (1988).
10. C. P. Chamberlain et al., Oecologia 109, 132 (1997).
11. B. A. Malmgren, A. Winter, D. L. Chen, J. Clim. 11, 2713 (1998).
12. D. R. Rubenstein, thesis, Dartmouth College (1999).
13. C. F. Ropelewski and M. S. Halpert, Mon. Weather Rev. 115, 1606 (1987).
14. We documented the fate of all nests found and recorded the number of young fledged annually per warbler pair (n = 488 pairs) within a 64-ha plot in New Hampshire. All nestlings were weighed and banded on day 6 after hatching, the last day to safely handle young during the 8-day nestling period without causing premature fledging. Therefore, the mass on day 6 was used as the estimate of mass at fledging. Annual mean fledgling mass was computed by first averaging mass on a per nest basis (n = 392 nests) and then averaging means for all nests per year.
15. I. Newton, Population Limitation in Birds (Academic Press, London, 1998), pp. 149-151.
16. We conducted Durbin-Watson tests for independence for all correlation analyses and found no statistical evidence of temporal autocorrelation.
17. 1995).
18. N. L. Rodenhouse and R. T. Holmes, Ecology 73, 357 (1992).
19. Availability of lepidopteran larvae was quantified on biweekly censuses. A census entailed visually inspecting 8000 understory leaves on transects through the study plot and recording length of each larva present. Larval lengths were converted to biomass using length-mass regressions.
20. No banded fledglings from the 64-ha plot in New Hampshire have returned to the plot as breeding adults, nor have any been resighted on winter quarters. Thus, the relations between annual fecundity and recruitment documented here represent warbler population dynamics occurring at a larger, regional scale.
21. D. G. Ainley, L. B. Spear, S. G. Allen, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 137, 1 (1996).
22. F. M. Jaksic, S. I. Silva, P. L. Meserve, J. R. Gutierrez, Oikos 78, 341 (1997).
23. P. R. Grant, Ecology and evolution of Darwin's Finches (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1999).
24. S. J. Wright, C. Carrasco, O. Calderón, S. Paton, Ecology 80, 1632 (1999).
25. G. A. Polis, S. D. Hurd, C. T. Jackson, F. S. Pinero, Ecology 78, 1884 (1997).
26. B. Wuethrich, Science 287, 793 (2000).
27. R. A. Kerr, Science 283, 1108 (1999).
28. R. Lande, Am. Nat. 142, 911 (1993).
29. J.-D. Lebreton, K. P. Burnham, J. Clobert, D. R. Anderson, Ecol. Monogr. 62, 67 (1992).
30. G. C. White and K. P. Burnham, Bird Study 46, 120 (1999).
31. 1. Recapture probability was modeled as either constant or as dependent on year. We did not model age-or sex-related differences in these parameters because of small sample sizes from Jamaica. Identical but separate models were run for the Jamaica and New Hampshire populations. Model details can be found at Science Online at www.sciencemag.org/features/ data/1049756/shl.
32. Funded by grants from the NSF. We are grateful for the advice and assistance of M. Ayres, D. Bolger, K. Cottingham, P. Doran, M. Johnson, W. Lowe, P. Marra, M. McPeek, S. Morrison, L. Nagy, J. Nichols, P. Roberts, K. Sillett, S. C. Sillett, and A. Strong. We thank the Jamaica Natural Resources Conservation Authority, the Williams and Sutton families of Jamaica, and the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest of the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Northeastern Research Station for their support and cooperation.