Guest and subunit exchange in self-assembled ionophores

Organic Letters

Volumn 2, Issue 12, 2000, Pages 1665-1668

  Cai, Mangmang ^a   Sidorov, Vladimir ^a   Lam, Yiu Fai ^a   Flowers II, Robert A ^b   Davis, Jeffery T ^a  

^a Bldg 142   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CATION; DRUG DERIVATIVE; GUANOSINE; IONOPHORE; LIGAND;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; CONFORMATION; HYDROGEN BOND; ION TRANSPORT; KINETICS; METABOLISM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY;

CATIONS; GUANOSINE; HYDROGEN BONDING; ION TRANSPORT; IONOPHORES; KINETICS; LIGANDS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE;

EID: 0034658931     PISSN: 15237060     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ol0058442     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Rebek, J., Jr. Acc. Chem. Res. 1999, 32, 278-286.
2. (a) Szabo, T.; Hilmersson, G.; Rebek, J., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6193-6194.
3. (b) Santamaria, J.; Martin, T.; Hilmersson, G.; Craig, S. L.; Rebek, J., Jr. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96, 8344-8347.
4. (a) Chapman, R. G.; Olovsson, G.; Trotter, J.; Sherman, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6252-6260.
5. (b) Chapman, R. G.; Sherman, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 9818-9826.
6. (a) Mogck, O.; Pons, M.; Böhmer, V.; Vogt, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 5706-5712.
7. (b) Shivanyuk, A.; Paulus, E. F.; Böhmer, V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 2906-2909.
8. Li, Y.; Gokel, G.; Hernandez, J.; Echegoyen, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 3087-3096.
9. For guanosine derivatives, see: (a) Marlow, A. L.; Mezzina, E.; Spada, G. P.; Masiero, S.; Davis, J. T.; Gottarelli, G. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 5116-5123.
10. (b) Forman, S. L.; Fettinger, J. C.; Pieracinni, S.; Gottarelli, G,; Davis, J. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 4060-4067.
11. Cai, M.; Marlow, A. L.; Fettinger, J. C.; Fabris, D.; Haverlock, T. J.; Moyer, B. A.; Davis, J. T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 1283-1285.
12. Kim, J.; Shamsipur, M.; Huang, S. Z.; Huang, R. H.; Dye, J. L. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 5615-5620.
13. 3 confirmed that isoG 1 self-associates extensively, with aggregation factors ranging from 3.6 at 10 mM to 5.3 at 100 mM. We thank Drs. Kostas Kavallieratos and Bruce Moyer (ORNL) for communication of these results.
14. + can be viewed as an ion-templated process, or as an example of dynamic combinatorial chemistry, wherein the cation selects for a small amount of the preformed macrocycle: Lehn, J.-M. Chem. Eur. J. 1999, 9, 2455-2463.
15. n.
16. + were determined by comparing experimental and simulated spectra using a nonlinear least squares program, gNMR-4 (Cherwell Scientific, Palo Alto, CA, 94303).
17. + line width, indicating that the dominant exchange mechanism is bimolecular. For more quantitative details, see: (a) Strasser, O. B.; Shamsipur, M.; Popov, I. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1985, 89, 4822-4824.
18. (b) Briere, K. M.; Detellier, C. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 2185-2189.
19. Perrin, C. L.; Dwyer, T. J. Chem. Rev. 1990, 90, 935-967.
20. app. See: Perrin, C. L.; Gipe, R. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 4691-4692.