Induction of xenoreactive CD4+ T-cell anergy by suppressor CD8+CD28- T cells

Transplantation

Volumn 69, Issue 7, 2000, Pages 1304-1310

  Colovai, Adriana I ^a   Liu, Zhuoru ^a   Ciubotariu, Rodica ^a   Lederman, Seth ^a   Cortesini, Raffaello ^b   Suciu Foca, Nicole ^a  

^a The New York Presbyterian Hospital   (United States)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ANTIGEN PRESENTING CELL; ANTIGEN RECOGNITION; ARTICLE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CLONAL ANERGY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOKINE PRODUCTION; HELPER CELL; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE TREATMENT; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SUPPRESSOR CELL; SWINE; T LYMPHOCYTE ACTIVATION; XENOGRAFT;

EID: 0034655709     PISSN: 00411337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200004150-00016     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Reinherz EL, Schlossman SF. The differentiation and functions of human T lymphocytes. Cell 1980; 19: 821.
2. Engleman EG, Benike CJ, Grumet FC, Evans RL. Activation of human T lymphocyte subsets: helper and suppressor/cytotoxic T cells recognize and respond to distinct histocompatibility antigens. J Immunol 1981 127: 2124.
3. Morimoto C, Reinherz EL, Todd RF, Distaso JA, Schlossman SF. Generation of antigen specific suppressor cells in vitro in man. J Immunol 1983; 131: 1209.
4. Damle NK, Mohagheghpour N, Hansen JA, Engelman EG. Alloantigen specific cytotoxic and suppressor T lymphocytes are derived from phenotypically distinct precursors. J Immunol 1983; 131: 2296.
5. Damle N, Engleman EG. Antigen-specific suppressor T lymphocytes in man. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 1989; 53: S17.
6. Noble A, Zhao ZS, Cantor H. Suppression of immune responses by CD8 cells. II. Qa-1 on activated B cells stimulates CD8 cell suppression of T helper 2 responses. J Immunol 1998; 160: 566.
7. Ridge JP, DiRosa F, Matzinger P. A conditioned dendritic cell can be a temporal bridge between a CD4+ T-helper and a T-killer cell. Nature 1998; 393: 474.
8. Bennett SRM, Carbone FR, Karamalis F, Flavell RA, Miller JF, Heath WR. Help for cytotoxic T-cell responses is mediated by CD40 signaling. Nature 1998; 393: 478.
9. Schoenberger SP, Toes RE, van der Voort EI, Offringa R, Melief CJ. T-cell help for cytotoxic T lymphocytes is mediated by CD40-CD40L interactions. Nature 1998; 393: 480.
10. + T cells. Immunity 1995; 2: 177.
11. + T cells that specifically delete autologous CD4 T cells expressing Vβ8 TCR: a role of the Qa-1 molecule. Immunity 1995; 2: 185.
12. Noble A, Pestano GA, Cantor H. Suppression of the immune responses by CD8 cells. I. Superantigen-activated CD8 cells induce unidirectional Fas-mediated apoptosis of antigen-activated CD4 cells. J Immunol 1998; 159: 559.
13. - T cells. Int Immunol 1998; 10: 775.
14. Jiang S, Tugulea S, Pennesi G, et al. Induction of MHC-class I restricted human suppressor T cells by peptide priming in vitro. Hum Immunol 1998; 59: 690.
15. - regulatory T cells. J Immunol 1998; 161: 5193.
16. Singer DS, Ehrlich R, Satz L, et al. Structure and expression of class I MHC genes in the miniature swine. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 1987; 17: 211.
17. Hirsh F, Germana S, Gustafsson K, Pratt K, Sachs DH, Laguern C. Structure and expression of class II α genes in miniature swine. J Immunol 1992; 149: 841.
18. Gustafsson K, Germana S, Hirsch F, Platt K, Languern C, Sachs DH. Structure of miniature swine class II DRB genes: conservation of hypervariable amino acid residues between distantly related mammalian species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87: 9798.
19. - T cell leukemia subclone with contact-dependent helper function. J Immunol 1991; 147: 3389.
20. Caux C, Massacrier C, Vanbervliet B, et al. Activation of human dendritic cells through CD40 cross-linking. J Exp Med 1994; 180: 1263.
21. Alderson MR, Armitage RJ, Tough TW, Strockbine L, Fanslow WC, Spriggs MK. CD40 expression by human monocytes: regulation by cytokines and activation of monocytes by the ligand for CD40. J Exp Med 1993; 178: 669.
22. Buhlmann JE, Foy TM, Arutto A, et al. In the absence of a CD40 signal, B cells are tolerogenic. Immunity 1995; 2: 645.
23. Clark EA, Ledbetter JA. How T and B cells talk to each other. Nature 1994; 367: 425.
24. Ding L, Green JM, Thompson CB, Shevach EM. B7/CD28 dependent and independent induction of CD40 ligand expression. J Immunol 1995; 155: 5124.
25. Van Gool SW, Vandenberghe P, de Boer M, Ceuppens JL. CD80, CD86 and CD40 provide accessory signals in a multiple-step T-cell activation model. Immunol Rev 1996; 153: 47.
26. Lombardi G, Sidhu S, Batchelor R, Lechler R. Anergic T cells as suppressor cells in vitro. Science 1994; 264: 1587.
27. a expressing cells. Nature 1989; 339: 541.
28. + T cells by staphylococcal enterotoxin B. J Exp Med 1991; 172: 1091.
29. Schwartz RH. Models of T cell anergy: Is there a common molecular mechanism? J Exp Med 1996; 184: 1.
30. Mandel TE, Kovarik J, Koulmanda M, Georgiou HM. Cellular rejection of fetal pancreas grafts: differences between allo- and xenografts rejection. Xenotransplantation 1997; 4: 2.
31. Greenstein JL, Sachs DH. The use of tolerance for transplantation across xenogeneic barriers. Nat Biotechnol 1997; 15: 235.
32. + T cells that induces contact dependent B cell differentiation (help). J Exp Med 1992; 175: 1091.
33. Larsen CP, Alexander DZ, Hollenbaugh D, et al. CD40-gp39 interactions play a critical role during allograft rejection: suppression of allograft rejection by blockade of the CD40-gp39 pathway. Transplantation 1996; 61: 4.
34. Bowen F, Haluskey J, Quill H. Altered CD40 ligand induction in tolerant T lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol 1995; 25: 2830.
35. Larsen CP, Elwood ET, Alexander DZ, et al. Long-term acceptance of skin and cardiac allografts after blocking CD40 and CD28 pathways. Nature 1996; 381: 434.