Vergence adaptation and the clinical AC/A ratio

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 207-211

  Rosenfield, Mark ^a   Rappon, Joseph M ^a   Carrel, Meredith F ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR CONVERGENCE; EYELID CLOSURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL ADAPTATION;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONVERGENCE, OCULAR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TIME FACTORS; VISION, MONOCULAR;

EID: 0034604006     PISSN: 02755408     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0275-5408(99)00051-4     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bennett A.G., Rabbetts R.B. Clinical Visual Optics. 2nd ed. 1989;207 Butterworths, London.
2. Ebenholtz S.M., Fisher S.K. Distance adaptation depends on plasticity in the oculomotor control system. Percept. Psychophys. 31:1982;551-560.
3. Ellerbrock V.J. Tonicity induced by fusional movements. Am. J. Optom. Arch. Am. Acad. Optom. 27:1950;8-20.
4. Fisher S.K., Ciuffreda K.J. Adaptation to optically-increased interocular separation under naturalistic viewing conditions. Perception. 19:1990;171-180.
5. Hung G.K., Ciuffreda K.J., Rosenfield M. Proximal contribution to a linear static model of accommodation and vergence. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 16:1996;31-41.
6. Jiang B.C. Accommodative vergence is driven by the phasic component of the accommodative controller. Vision Res. 36:1996;97-102.
7. Manny R.E., Fern K.D. Binocular function. Zadnik K. The Ocular Examination. 1997;124-201 Saunders, Philadelphia.
8. Marlow F.W. The Relative Position of Rest of the Eyes and the Prolonged Occlusion Test. 1924;Davis, Philadelphia, USA.
9. Morgan M.W. The clinical aspects of accommodation and convergence. Am. J. Optom. Arch. Am. Acad. Optom. 21:1944;301-313.
10. Ogle K.N., Prangen AdeH. Observations on vertical divergences and hyperphorias. Arch. Ophthalmol. 49:1953;313-334.
11. Rosenfield M. Tonic vergence and vergence adaptation. Optom. Vis. Sci. 74:1997;303-328.
12. Rosenfield M. Prism adaptation: Relevance in clinical practice. J. Optom. Vis. Dev. 28:1997;68-76.
13. Rosenfield M., Chun T.W., Fischer S.W. Effect of prolonged occlusion on the subjective assessment of heterophoria. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 17:1997;478-482.
14. Rosenfield M., Ciuffreda K.J., Chen H.W. Effect of age on the interaction between the AC/A and CA/C ratios. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 15:1995;451-455.
15. Rosenfield M., Ciuffreda K.J., Hung G.K. The linearity of proximally-induced accommodation and vergence. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 32:1991;2985-2991.
16. Rosenfield M., Gilmartin B. The effect of vergence adaptation on convergent accommodation. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 8:1988;172-177.
17. Schor C.M. The influence of rapid prism adaptation upon fixation disparity. Vision Res. 19:1979;757-765.
18. Schor C.M., Tsuetaki T.K. Fatigue of accommodation and vergence modifies their mutual interactions. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 28:1987;1250-1259.
19. Schroeder T.L., Rainey B.B., Goss D.A., Grosvenor T.P. Reliability of and comparisons among methods of measuring dissociated phoria. Optom. Vis. Sci. 73:1996;389-397.