A Comparison of Women's Sizing by 3D Electronic Scanning and Traditional Anthropometry

Journal of the Textile Institute

Volumn 91, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 163-173

  Bougourd, J P ^a   Dekker, L ^b   Ross, P Grant ^a   Ward, J P ^a  

^a LONDON COLLEGE OF FASHION   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOMETRY; BODY SCANNING; ELECTRONICS; MEASURING SYSTEM; WOMENSWEAR;

EID: 0034580681     PISSN: 00405000     EISSN: 17542340     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00405000008659536     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bradtmiller, B., and Gross, M.E., 1999. 3D Whole Body Scans:Measurement Extraction Software Validation. In Proceedings of International Conference on Digital Human Modelling for Design and Engineering, Society of Automotive Engineers, The Hague, Netherlands.
2. Brooke-Wavell, K., Jones, P. R.M., and West, C. M., 1994. Reliability and Repeatability of 3D Body Scanner (LASS) Measurements Compared to Anthropometry. Ann. Human Biol., 21:571–577.
3. Brunsman, M.A., Daanen, H.A.M., and Robinette, K.M., 1997. Optimal Postures and Positioning for Human Body Scanning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Advances in 3D Digital Imaging and Modeling, IEEE Press, NJ, USA, pp. 266–274.
4. Corner, B., and Hu, A., 1998. Effect of Sway on Image Fidelity in Whole Body Digitizing. Proc. SPIE, 3313:90–99.
5. Daanen, H.A.M., 1998. Circumference Estimation Using 3D Whole Body Scanners and Shadow Scanners. In Proceedings of the Workshop on 3D Anthropometry and Industrial Products Design, Laboratoire d'Anthropologie Appliqué, University of Paris V. pp. 5–1–5–6.
6. Daanen, H. A.M., and van de Water, G. J., 1998. Whole Body Scanners. Displays, 19:111–120.
7. Daanen, H.A.M., Brunsman, M.A., and Robinette, K.M., 1997. Reducing Movement Artifacts in Whole Body Scanning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Advances in 3D Digital Imaging and Modeling, IEEE Press, NJ, USA, pp. 262–265.
8. Dekker, L., Khan, S., West, E., Buxton, B., and Treleaven, P., 1998. Models for Understanding the 3D Human Body Form. In Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Model- based 3D Image Analysis, at ICCV, pp. 65–74.
9. Geisen, C., Mason, G.P., Houston, V., Whitestone, I., McQuiston, B., and Beattie, A., 1995. Automatic Detection, Identification, and Registration of Anatomical Landmarks. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, The Society, San Diego, CA, USA, Vol. 2, pp. 750–753.
10. Horiguchi, C., 1998. BL (Body Line) Scanner. Int. Arch. Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, 31 (Part 5):421–429.
11. Human Quality of Life Institute. 1995. Report on Project to Construct a Database for Measurements of the Human Body, Osaka, Japan:HQL Institute.
12. International Organization for Standardization, 1989. ISO 8559:1989 (E):Garment Construction and Anthropometric Surveys - Body Dimensions.
13. Jones, P. R.M., and Rioux, M., 1997. Three-dimensional Surface Anthropometry:Applications to the Human Body. Optics Lasers Engng, 28:89–117.
14. Jones, P.R.M., West, G., Harris D., and Read J., 1989. The Loughborough Anthropometric Shadow Scanner (LASS). Endeavour, 13 (New Series). 164–168.
15. Kemsley, W.F.F. (Editor), 1957. Women's Measurements and Sizes, HMSO, London.
16. Kunick, P., 1984. Modern Sizing and Pattern Making for Women's and Children's Garments, Philip Kunick Publications, London.
17. Lewark, E.A., and Nurre, J.H., 1998. Automated [sic] Fudicial Labeling on Human Body Data. Proc. SPIE, 3313, 82–89.
18. Marks & Spencer plc., 1986. Findings of Women's Sizing Survey (press release). Marks & Spencer, London.
19. Nurre, J.H., 1997. Locating Landmarks on Human Body Scan Data. In Proceedings of International Conference on Recent Advances in 3D Digital Imaging and Modeling, IEEE Press, NJ, USA, pp. 289–295.
20. Pargas, R., Staples, N., and Davis, S., 1997. Automated Measurement Extraction for Apparel from a 3D Body Scan. Optics Laser Technol., 28:2
21. Seitz, T., 1998. The Optical Measurement System PCMAN. In Proceedings of the Workshop on 3D Anthropometry and Industrial Products Design, Laboratoire d'Anthropologie Appliqué, University of Paris V. pp. 7–1–7–4.
22. Simeon, B., 1973, Berlei Size Right Survey. Brit. Clothing Mfr, 9, No. 4, 32.
23. Society of Automotive Engineers, 1999. Digitally Defining the Human Body - CAESAR 3D Anthropometric Database. http://www.sae.orq. USA
24. Tait, N., 1998. SAMAB CAD, An Array of Systems Opportunities to 'Keep Ahead'. Apparel Int., 29 (No. 4):35–40.
25. Telmat, 1996. Automated Body Measuring and Garment Size Allocating System. Telmat Editions, No. 7, Telmat, Soultz, France.
26. Treleaven, P.C., Buxton, B., and Slater, M., 1998. 3D Centre for Electronic Commerce, Foresight LINK Award Application, University College London, London.
27. Wicks & Wilson Ltd, 1998. Triform 3D Scanners, Wicks & Wilson, Basingstoke, Hants, UK.
28. US Department of Agriculture, 1941a. Women's Measurements for Garments and Pattern Construction. USDA, New Orleans, SA, USA.
29. US Department of Agriculture, 1941b. Body Measurements of Boys and Girls for Garments and Pattern Construction, USDA, New Orleans, SA, USA.